current environment
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Current Environment?

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 38

Current Environment? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 142 Views
  • Uploaded on

Current Environment?. Helena Tinton HM Principal Inspector- Bristol. Current environment. Political Environment - Cost Recovery - Triennial Review Latest Statistics Recent Prosecutions. Political Background. HSE – NDPB of DWP Reduction in Government Funding

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Current Environment?' - oona


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
current environment

Current Environment?

Helena Tinton

HM Principal Inspector- Bristol

current environment1
Current environment
  • Political Environment

- Cost Recovery

- Triennial Review

  • Latest Statistics
  • Recent Prosecutions
political background
Political Background
  • HSE – NDPB of DWP
  • Reduction in Government Funding

Inspector No Funding £m

2009/10 1342 240

2012/13 1241 161

  • New Senior Management
cost recovery
Cost Recovery
  • Only dutyholders found to be in material breach of H&S law will incur a cost under FFI.

‘A material breach is when, in the opinion of the HSE inspector, there is or has been a contravention of H&S law that requires them to issue notice in writing of that opinion to the dutyholder.’

cost recovery1
Cost Recovery

Key Issues

  • Multi dutyholders
  • Long running investigations
  • Review later 2014
  • Level of income
  • Understandable frustration
  • Query/appeals process
triennial review
Triennial Review

‘Independent review of the function, form and governance of HSE’

Are the functions of HSE necessary?

Is current delivery model efficient and effective?

triennial review delivery model
Triennial Review – Delivery Model
  • Funding & Income
  • Pace, efficiency, effectiveness
  • Commercial options
  • Relationship with other regulators
hse triennial review ill health
HSE - Triennial Review – ill Health
  • Recognises challenge of tackling ill health
  • Recognises revised approaches
  • New /innovative approach
  • Focus on occupational cancer and respiratory disease
  • Improved communication – health and safety messages
triennial review1
Triennial Review
  • HSE correct body
  • Evaluation of FFI?
  • Greater commercialisation of HSE ?
  • Government Response
headline statistics 2012 13
Headline Statistics – 2012/13
  • Fatalities - 148

-Fall from height – 25%

-Contact with Machinery -14%

-Struck by vehicle - 13%

-Struck by object - 10%

  • Major Injuries – 19,707
headline statistics construction
Headline Statistics-Construction
  • 2012/13 – fatals - 44
  • 2012/13 – Major Injuries 1913
  • > 72% on small sites (<15)?
  • 48% on refurb
  • Safety related lost days – 0.5m
  • Health Related lost days – 1.7m
statistics
Statistics

Trends in fatal injury to workers, 1981-2012/13

statistics causes
Statistics - Causes

Fatality

%

Falls 59

Struck by object 3

Collapse/overturn 5

Hit by vehicle 10

Electricity 5

cd work plan priorities 2013 14
CD Work Plan Priorities 2013/14
  • Asbestos - 20%
  • Small Sites (<15) - 35%
  • Refurbishment - 25%
  • Major Client / Project - 5%
  • Local Priority - 15%

- Fragile Roofs

- Larger Regional contractors

small sites
Small Sites
  • Priority Topics

- Work at Height

- Good Order

- Competence

- Dust

- Asbestos

- Welfare

investigation
Investigation
  • Seat switch deliberately defeated
  • Training inadequate
  • System of work flawed – single operator
  • No monitoring of practice
lessons
Lessons
  • RA more than paper exercise
  • Worker involvement in RA
  • Look at all company activities
  • Suitable and sufficient training
  • Monitoring & Review
local issues1
Local issues

Floor Hangers

- Follow manufacturers instruction

- Min 3 courses of cured blockwork

above hanger before loading

Site Transport

  • Safe Site – segregation, eliminate reversing
  • Safe Vehicle – Suitable Visibility
  • Safe Driver – competence/ training
cdm 2007 proposed revision
CDM 2007 Proposed Revision

Why

  • Evaluation
  • Anecdotal shortcomings
  • Small sites – lack of bite
  • Better regulation agenda, Löfstedt
  • Under-implementation
cdm key changes
CDM – Key Changes
  • Four key areas of change for consultation
    • ACoP
    • CDM co-ordinator/Principal Designer
    • r4/Appendix 4 requirements
    • domestic clients
cdm revision
CDM Revision
  • Consequentials:
    • substantially simpler structure
    • Part 2 – Part 3 falls out
    • PC – PD symmetry
    • amended notification threshold
    • formal co-ordination threshold lowered
    • H&S plans on all projects
cdm revision1
CDM Revision
  • 3 month consultation
  • analysis, amendment
  • SMT/Board sign off
  • Ministerial sign off
  • Guidance development and publication timing
  • industry publicity
future
Future
  • CDM consultation
  • Triennial Review Government Response
  • New HSE Chief Executive
ad