1 / 16

Quarkonium Polarization Fit: Applied to one p T bin in CDF data

Quarkonium Polarization Fit: Applied to one p T bin in CDF data. Matthew Jones Purdue University. Recent Progress. Include rapidity dependence in background Updated integrated luminosity Restrict cross section to |y|< 0.6 Now using MuonLoPtEfficiency version 4.4

onslow
Download Presentation

Quarkonium Polarization Fit: Applied to one p T bin in CDF data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quarkonium Polarization Fit:Applied to one pT bin in CDF data Matthew Jones Purdue University B Production and Decay Meeting

  2. Recent Progress • Include rapidity dependence in background • Updated integrated luminosity • Restrict cross section to |y|<0.6 • Now using MuonLoPtEfficiency version 4.4 • CMP trigger efficiency measurement • Better understanding of the meaning of • Minima seem to be parabolic – generally okay to plot contours from error matrix instead of MINOS errors. • Measure polarization in different detector hemispheres… B Production and Decay Meeting

  3. Rapidity dependence of background • Background cross section previously generated to reproduce (m,pT) distribution. • The amount of background also depends on rapidity: less background at higher rapidity. • The ϒ(nS) signal yields are essentially independent of rapidity. • Measure background yield as a function of y, reject generated events to reproduce (m,pT,y) distribution in the background. • Should be incorporated into MC generation for subsequent iterations B Production and Decay Meeting

  4. Integrated Luminosity • Analyzed periods 0..28 (jbmm0d,h,I,j,k,m) • Good run list: goodrun_em_mu_nosi_cmxignored_v34 • Require complete runs for accurate luminosity accounting • Triggers: • UPSILON_CMUP_CMU • UPSILON_CMUP_CMX • Dynamically prescaled versions introduced in PHYSICS_3_07_v-1 • Equivalent luminosity: • Increased by 20% compared with previous presentation. • Unclear where the previous numbers came from; the numbers printed in the old log file agree with the current numbers. • Maybe possible, in principle, to track it down… B Production and Decay Meeting

  5. Restricted ϒ(nS) rapidity • The Run I cross section measured Br(ϒ(nS) μ+μ-) x • Now restricting generated and reconstructed rapidity to the same interval, |y|<0.6. • Can also consider |y|<0.8 and |y| < 0.4 for comparison. • It will also be important to compare polarization finer intervals of rapidity in case it is changing with y. CMUP+CMU/CMUP+CMX CMUP+CMX B Production and Decay Meeting

  6. CMP Efficiency • Assume a negligible fake muon component, in the CMUP+CMU trigger path • Require one muon to satisfy CMUP trigger • The other is unbiased by CMP • Analyze 15° wedges separately • Parameterize as a function of pT and z position in the chamber: B Production and Decay Meeting

  7. CMP Geometry B Production and Decay Meeting

  8. CMP Efficiency Is this real loss of efficiency or is it because CMU has a hole at z=0? • Example: CMP wedge 4 B Production and Decay Meeting

  9. CMP Efficiency • Asymptotic efficiency in all wedges: Typically about 80% B Production and Decay Meeting

  10. Measured cross section Br(ϒ(nS) μ+μ-) x • Now we measure: Corrected by a factor of 0.93 for efficiency loss due to radiative effects. Same in Run I, checked with EvtGen. B Production and Decay Meeting

  11. Polarization parameters • Perhaps not quite so dramatic… 3S 2S S-channel helicity 1S Collins-Soper B Production and Decay Meeting

  12. Is this even possible? 0<y<0.6 -0.6<y<0 Need to understand this better… it might even be unphysical… B Production and Decay Meeting

  13. The meaning of … • Previously we had pondered what it meant when = This expression is invariant under rotations. B Production and Decay Meeting

  14. General proof B Production and Decay Meeting

  15. The meaning of … • There is nothing wrong with large values of ε [-1,∞) • Examples: + B Production and Decay Meeting

  16. Conclusions • Confidence is building, but we still need more good cross checks… • Cross section seems low now – no good explanation at this time. • Need to understand polarization measured in subdivided acceptance regions. • Other pT bins? Maybe not quite ready yet… B Production and Decay Meeting

More Related