1 / 23

Issues in Teaching Through Inquiry

Issues in Teaching Through Inquiry. Rachel Spronken-Smith Higher Education Development Centre, University of Otago, New Zealand With input from INLT Team: Jo Bullard (Loughborough), Waverly Ray (MiraCosta), Carolyn Roberts (Gloucestershire), Artimus Keiffer (Wittenburg)

onawa
Download Presentation

Issues in Teaching Through Inquiry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Issues in Teaching Through Inquiry Rachel Spronken-Smith Higher Education Development Centre, University of Otago, New Zealand With input from INLT Team: Jo Bullard (Loughborough), Waverly Ray (MiraCosta), Carolyn Roberts (Gloucestershire), Artimus Keiffer (Wittenburg) TMF Team*: Tom Angelo (VUW), Billy O’Steen (UC), Helen Matthews (CPIT) and Jane Robertson *Funded by Ministry of Education

  2. To explore what is meant by inquiry-based learning and the nature of an inquiry curriculum To share examples of IBL and consider how progression can be made into an IBL curriculum Outline What is inquiry-based learning, IBL? What are the theoretical underpinnings of IBL? Does IBL lead to better outcomes? What examples of IBL are there in higher education? What are the implications for teaching IBL? What can we surmise about IBL? Aims of session

  3. What is inquiry-based learning? I(enquiry) Guided-inquiry Inductive teaching Discovery learning Research-based teaching Undergraduate research

  4. What does the term inquiry or inquiry-based learning mean to you?

  5. IBL involves: Learning stimulated by inquiry i.e. driven by questions or research problems Learning based on a process of seeking new knowledge and understanding (but new to who?) An inductive approach to teaching A student/learner/learning-centred approach with the teacher as a facilitator A move to self-directed learning An active approach to learning Optional attributes of IBL: Collaborative/group learning Community involvement Field-based activity Resource-based learning Multi or inter-disciplinary focus So how have we defined IBL? IBL is a pedagogy which best enables students to experience the processes of knowledge creation Students engaged in IBL should develop: • Critical thinking skills • The ability for independent inquiry • Responsibility for their own learning • Intellectual growth and maturity (Lee et al., 2004)

  6. Model of the inquiry process (Justice et al., 2002:19) Engaging a topic & developing basic knowledge Taking responsibility for learning Developing a question Evaluating success Self-reflection & Self-evaluation Communicating new understandings Determining what needs to be known Identifying resources, gathering data Synthesising Assessing data

  7. The relations between inquiry-based learning, problem-based learning and active learning (Spronken-Smith et al., 2007)

  8. What are the theoretical underpinnings of IBL? • Constructivism • Motivating learners • Intellectual development & approaches to learning • Strengthening teaching-research links

  9. STUDENT-FOCUSED STUDENTS AS PARTICIPANTS Future of uni teaching? Research-tutored Curriculum emphasizes learning focused on students writing and discussing papers or essays Research-based Curriculum emphasizes students undertaking inquiry-based learning EMPHASIS ON RESEARCH PROCESSES & PROBLEMS EMPHASIS ON RESEARCH CONTENT Research-led (or research- informed) Curriculum is structured around teaching subject content Research-oriented Curriculum emphasizes teaching processes of knowledge construction in the subject Lecture-based uni teaching TEACHER-FOCUSED STUDENTS AS AUDIENCE Healey (2005)

  10. Positive Academic achievement Process skills Analytic abilities Critical thinking Creativity Enjoyment, enthusiasm and engagement Negative Perceived  workload Anxiety over need to become self-directed learners Difficulties with group dynamics Does IBL lead to better outcomes? Students…

  11. Positive Strengthening of teaching-research links Pride in student achievements Enjoyment Negative Anxiety over the lack of structure Anxiety over when to intervene Concern over disparate tutor input IBL outcomes for teachers Need for more studies – particularly those that examine the teaching-research link

  12. Communications (Oliver 2006) History (Slatta 2004) Literacy (Hutchings & O’Rourke, 2003) Foreign languages (Luke, 2006; Kennedy & Navey-Stokes, 2004; Malinowski, 2004) Music (Kramer & Arnold, 2004) Social Science (Justice et al., 2002) Psychology (Muukkonen et al., 2005; Pond, 2004) Social work (Plowright & Watkins, 2004) Design (Davis & Tesar, 2004) Medicine (Houlden et al., 2004) Physics (Abell, 2005; Volkmann & Zgagacz, 2004) Meteorology (Yarger et al., 2000) Chemistry (Ball et al., 2004; Barak & Dori, 2005; Zoller, 1999) Microbiology (Hyman & Luginbuhl, 2004) Science (Rangachari, 2006; Oliver-Hoyo & Beichner, 2004) Food science (Turner & Daubert, 2004) Engineering (Kirkman et al., 2004) Forestry (Yin, 2006) What are examples of IBL in HE? Plus numerous cases of problem-based learning (a subset of IBL)

  13. Social science – a grammar for inquiry (Justice et al., 2002) • Provide a ‘recipe’ that any discipline could use as a basis for an inquiry course (their recipe is for a first year course) • Initiative aimed to develop a course that focused on the development of broad academic and intellectual skills in the context of student self-directed learning • Outcome hoped for was that students would approach their studies more deeply and think critically and reflectively about the production of knowledge

  14. Model of the inquiry process (Justice et al., 2002:19) Engaging a topic & developing basic knowledge Taking responsibility for learning Evaluating success Developing a question Self-reflection & Self-evaluation Communicating new understandings Determining what needs to be known Identifying resources, gathering data Synthesising Assessing data

  15. Model of the inquiry process (Justice et al., 2002:19) Engaging a topic & developing basic knowledge Taking responsibility for learning Evaluating success Developing a question Self-reflection & Self-evaluation Communicating new understandings Determining what needs to be known Identifying resources, gathering data Synthesising Assessing data

  16. Fostering use of inquiry – within class activities • Lectures: using inquiry questions and getting students to work together to find possible answers • Tutorials (face-to-face or online): discussion questions based on key readings or concepts • Other examples?

  17. Within-course activities • Project work: individual or group research • Reports, posters, presentations, proposals • Inquiry modules • Tutorials based around problem-solving or considering issues • Other examples?

  18. Inquiry courses • To take learners (students and teachers?) through the whole inquiry/research cycle • First year  advanced • Questions supplied or generated? • If supplied – by whom? • External agencies • Teachers • Past students • Checklist for inquiry course • Examples?

  19. Ecology degree at Otago University Stage 1 Invertebrate biodiversity project Stage 2 Community and ecosystem research • Undertake field work • Laboratory analysis • Data processing • Write a report • Work in small groups on a guided research project • Choice of ecosystem • Produce a scientific poster • Produce a research proposal • Peer review proposals Stage 3 Ecology Field Course • Field work to learn skills and develop inquiry questions • Three days of data gathering in field • Produce a presentation • Produce a report in journal style

  20. What are the implications for teaching IBL? • Which type of IBL and at what stage? • Prolonged exposure best • Many advantages of beginning at stage 1 • Plan to have advanced students design and complete a research project (collaboratively and/or independently)

  21. Implications for teaching (cont.) • How to manage the teaching team? • Involve team in planning • Draw on research into learning theory and IBL • Support teachers (ptc new ones) • Develop a community of practice • Have regular meetings and share experiences of teaching in this mode

  22. Implications for teaching (cont.) • How to facilitate IBL? • Orient students to this type of learning environment • Rationale • Group functioning • Ask open-ended questions that provoke further discussion • Support students – value their ideas and contributions • Encourage students to reflect on their experiences (keep a reflective diary; have assessment that requires reflection) • Monitor progress • Challenge student thinking • Develop an atmosphere of trust • Gain feedback on the course

  23. What can we surmise about IBL? • IBL – contested term and relations between IBL and PBL are not well understood • Motivation for IBL is well grounded in educational theory • There are clear benefits of using IBL for both students and teachers (but there are challenges too) BUT more studies are required • IBL has been used sparsely in most discipline areas • Can be used for within-class activities  projects  courses  degree programmes • Implications for teachers: • Consider what type of IBL to implement, and at which stage • Course coordinators need to carefully manage the teaching team • Students need to be oriented to this learning environment, particularly if engaged in an inquiry course Thanks to the Ministry of Education for funding this research

More Related