Perceiving evaluating other people
Download
1 / 19

Perceiving evaluating other people Why do we evaluate others - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 388 Views
  • Uploaded on

Perceiving & evaluating other people Why do we evaluate others? all of us are naïve psychologists Are we accurate? often however, our judgments can suffer from a number of biases analogy: bias/ perceptual illusion; gives cue to normal processing Attributions from behavior Attribution

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Perceiving evaluating other people Why do we evaluate others' - omer


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Perceiving evaluating other people l.jpg
Perceiving & evaluating other people

  • Why do we evaluate others?

    • all of us are naïve psychologists

  • Are we accurate?

    • often

    • however, our judgments can suffer from a number of biases

      • analogy: bias/ perceptual illusion; gives cue to normal processing


Attributions from behavior l.jpg
Attributions from behavior

  • Attribution

    • a claim about the cause of someone’s behavior

    • Heider

      • Is behavior due to unique personal trait or is it a normal human behavior given the situation?


Person vs situation attributions l.jpg
Person vs. Situation Attributions

  • Kelley’s 3 questions

    • does this person regularly behave this way in this situation?

    • do others regularly behave this way in this situation?

    • does this person behave this way in many other situations?


Kelley s attributional logic l.jpg

(1) Does Susan regularly get angry in traffic jams?

(2) Do many other people get angry in traffic jams?

(3) Does Susan get angry in many other situations?

YES

NO

YES

NO

NO

YES

No personality or situational attribution

Situational attribution: traffic jams make people mad

Personality attribution, general

Personality attribution, particular

Kelley’s Attributional Logic


Person bias in attributions l.jpg
Person bias in attributions

  • People give too much weight to personality and not enough to situational variables

  • Conditions promoting person bias

    • task has goal of assessment of personality

    • observer is cognitively loaded (busy with other task)

  • Conditions promoting a situation bias

    • when goal is to judge the situation


Two stage model of attributions l.jpg
Two-stage Model of Attributions

  • First stage is rapid & automatic

    • bias according to goal (person/situation)

  • Second stage is slower & controlled

    • won’t occur if cognitively loaded

    • we correct our automatic attribution


Two stage model of attributions7 l.jpg

Automatic Attribution

Controlled Attribution

Observer’s goal

Revision: could be a funny show

Person: Joe laughs easily

What kind of person is Joe?

Situation: the TV show is funny

Revision: maybe Joe laughs easily

How funny is the TV comedy?

Two-stage Model of Attributions

Book example: Joe laughs hysterically while watching a TV comedy. What can we conclude?


Cross cultural differences l.jpg

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

0

United States

India

8 11 15 Adult

Cross-cultural differences

  • Western culture

    • people are in charge of own destinies

    • more attributions to personality

  • Some Eastern cultures

    • fate in charge of destiny

    • more attributions to situation

Attributions to internal

disposition

Age (years)


Does the trait describe 1 you 2 a close friend 3 a professor l.jpg
Does the trait describe: 1. You? 2. A close friend? 3. A professor

  • Outgoing

  • calm

  • agreeable

  • shrewd

  • self-disciplined

  • tidy

Y N D

YES NO Depends on

situation


Actor observer discrepancy l.jpg
Actor-Observer Discrepancy

  • Others’ behavior: Person bias

  • Own behavior: Situation bias

  • Why?

    • hypothesis 1: Knowledge across situations

    • hypothesis 2: visual orientation


Prior information effects l.jpg
Prior Information Effects

  • Mental representations of people (schemas) can effect our interpretation of them

    • Kelley’s study

      • guest speaker

      • students: half got written bio saying speaker was “very warm”, half got bio saying speaker was “rather cold”

      • “very warm” group rated guest more positively than “rather cold” group


Effects of personal appearance l.jpg
Effects of Personal Appearance

  • The attractiveness bias

    • physically attractive people are rated higher on intelligence, competence, sociability, morality

    • studies

      • teachers rate attractive children as smarter, and higher achieving

      • adults attribute cause of unattractive child’s misbehavior to personality, attractive child’s to situation

      • judges give longer prison sentences to unattractive people


Stereotypes l.jpg
Stereotypes

  • What is a stereotype?

    • schemas about a group of people

    • a belief held by members of one group about members of another group

    • how can we study stereotypes?

      • early studies just asked people

      • today’s society is sensitized to harmful effects of stereotyping

      • need different ways of studying


Studying stereotypes l.jpg
Studying stereotypes

  • 3 levels of stereotypes

    • public

      • what we say to others about a group

    • private

      • what we consciously think about a group, but don’t say to others

    • implicit

      • unconscious mental associations guiding our judgments and actions without our conscious awareness


Implicit stereotypes l.jpg
Implicit Stereotypes

  • Use of priming: subject doesn’t know stereotype is being activated, can’t work to suppress it

    • Bargh study

      • word lists, some include e.g. “gray,” “Bingo,” “Florida”

      • observed subjects walking to elevators

    • studies on racial stereoptypes


Implicit stereotypes16 l.jpg
Implicit Stereotypes

  • Devine’s automaticity theory

    • racial stereotypes are so prevalent in our culture that we all hold them

    • stereotypes are automatically activated

    • we have to actively resist them if we don’t wish to act in a prejudiced way.

    • Overcoming prejudice is possible, but takes work


Self fulfilling prophecies l.jpg
Self-fulfilling Prophecies

  • Beliefs & expectations create reality by influencing our behavior & others’

  • Pygmalion effect (liberal arts pop quiz: Who was Pygmalion?)

    • person A believes that person B has a particular characteristic

    • person B may begin to behave in accordance with that characteristic


Studies of the self fulfilling prophecy l.jpg
Studies of the Self-fulfilling Prophecy

  • Rosenthal & Fode

    • gave 2 groups of students randomly selected rats

    • told Group 1 they had “super genius” rats

    • told Group 2 they had “super moron” rats

    • all students told to train rats to run mazes

    • “genius” rat group ended up doing better than the “moron” rat group


Studies of the self fulfilling prophecy19 l.jpg
Studies of the Self-fulfilling Prophecy

  • Rosenthal & Jacobson

    • went to a school and did IQ tests with kids

    • told teachers test was a “spurters” test

    • randomly selected several kids and told the teacher they were spurters

    • did another IQ test at end of year

    • “spurters” showed significant improvements in their IQ scores

    • reason: teacher’s expectations of them


ad