Dependency theory
Download
1 / 26

Dependency Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 359 Views
  • Uploaded on

Dependency Theory. Towards a Critique of Developmentalist: Dependency Theory. 1960s-- United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America. Main Authors: Fernando H. Cardoso, Faletto, Theotonio Dos Santos.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Dependency Theory' - omer


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Towards a critique of developmentalist dependency theory
Towards a Critique of Developmentalist: Dependency Theory

  • 1960s-- United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America.

  • Main Authors: Fernando H. Cardoso, Faletto, Theotonio Dos Santos.

  • Main Thesis:Underdevelopment is not the product of the persistence of “traditional” society; instead, it is generated by the particular fashion the expansion of capitalism assumes in the “periphery.”


Developmentalist approaches are wrong. The expansion of the market does not necessarily produce either modernization or development.On the contrary, capitalism makes societies look like “feudal” in the periphery.


Development market does not necessarily produce either modernization or development. and underdevelopment constitute the two sides of the same coin: capitalism.The periphery is underdeveloped because of the development of the center.


Flows of Wealth market does not necessarily produce either modernization or development.

(Developed)Center

(Underdeveloped) Periphery


The play between Center and Periphery reproduces in all scales (fractal structure)CenterPeripheryCenter-Periphery Center-Periphery Center-Periphery-Center-PeripheryCenter-PeripheryCenter-Periphery

Unequal and Combined Development:


Sovereign States scales (fractal structure)

Center (Ex: England, the U.S.)

Elites

DEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT

The State and the Nation split apart

(capitalist) (popular)

Non-sovereign States


WORLD MARKET scales (fractal structure)

PERIPHERY

CENTER

SOCIAL EXCLUSION (POVERTY)


Against Rostow, Huntington, Moore, and... Marx, Cardoso and Faletto argue that...

Modernization, Industrialization, Urbanization, to Development do not lead in the periphery. Instead, they foster Underdevelopment, a “caricature” of the central societies.



In the periphery the development of capitalism leads to
In the periphery, the development of capitalism leads to... Faletto argue that...

  • Dependent and unequal development (distorted, uneven, and pathological form of modernization).

  • Increasing dependency.


Politically

(economic and social integration fosters) Faletto argue that...

Democracies, extended citizenship, and the rule of law, which PREVAIL in the Center

Free market + Democracy

(economic and social exclusion fosters)

Dictatorships (or Formal Democracies), State violence, limited citizenship, and the (un)rule of law, which PREVAIL in the Periphery.

Alliance:

the State + Corporations

Free market + Repression

Politically...


Cardoso faletto
Cardoso & Faletto: Faletto argue that...

  • “The same fundamental alliance which constitutes a dependent industrial capitalist state may organize itself institutionally within a context of authoritarianism, restricted democracy, or totalitarianism.”


SOLUTION: Faletto argue that... BREAK UP THE BONDS OF DEPENDENCY

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x


Since dependency capitalism breaking with dependency socialism
Since Faletto argue that...Dependency = Capitalism,Breaking with dependency= Socialism


Cardoso faletto identify three main strategies to break the dependency bonds target the state
Cardoso & Faletto identify three main strategies to break the dependency bonds (target: the State)

  • Guerrilla movements organized against military dictatorships (ex: Argentina 1969-1975)

  • The Democratic Path: Salvador Allende’s government (1970-1973)

  • Military Reformism (ex: Perú)

    Importance of politics.


C & F: “the political struggle revolving around the state shows what is essential in this form of dependency: the style of development of the possibility of alternatives depends upon the resolution of this question of the state.”


South east asia
South East Asia... shows what is essential in this form of dependency:

  • The explosive economic growth in South East Asia at the beginning of the 1980s was considered by most scholars the demise of the dependency theory.

    • Argument: the dependency theory cannot explain such a process of growth.


Wallerstein the world system
Wallerstein – shows what is essential in this form of dependency: The World-System

  • Our concepts and the units of analysis we choose do not allow us to understand the real organization of the world.

  • Problem: the developmentalist perspective consecrates the nation state as the main unit of analysis.


Instead from a holistic perspective
Instead, from a holistic perspective... shows what is essential in this form of dependency:

  • The notion of “mode of production” appears as central.

    • (def.) “the way in which decisions are made about dividing up productive tasks, about quantities of goods to be produced and labour-time to be invested, about quantitites of goods to be consumed or accumulated, about the distribution of the goods produced.” (345)


Modes of production
Modes of Production shows what is essential in this form of dependency:

  • “Reciprocal-lineage.”

  • “World-systems”

    • “World-Empire”

    • -“World-Economy”


Reciprocal lineage
“Reciprocal-lineage.” shows what is essential in this form of dependency:

  • Limited and elementary specialization of tasks and forms of exchange. Based on human labor. Limited growth. Mini-systems, short-lived (6 generations).


World systems 1 world empire
“World-systems”1: shows what is essential in this form of dependency: “World-Empire.”

  • Based upon agriculture. Surplus allows to maintain artisans and an “administrative” class. Extra-economic foundation (tribute, force, the power of the sword). Technological advance is not desirable per se. Everthing is “fixed” in the system. Political unity of the economy

    • Interest of the powerful on the survival of the subjected sectors.


World systems 2 world economy
“World-systems”2: shows what is essential in this form of dependency: “World-Economy.”

Single division of labor within a system which “has no overarching political structure.”

World-market, multiplicity of nation-states. Capitalism. No limits to profit. Starvation may be necessary for profit. Appearance of “the poor.”


Markets became dominant in the world economy
Markets became dominant in the “World-Economy” shows what is essential in this form of dependency:

  • System economically unified and politically fragmented (World-market + Nation-States).

  • Different nation-states cushion and reinforce the effects of the market.

  • Importance of the role of the State...


Critical and dependencista approaches lead towards
Critical and “dependencista” approaches lead towards... shows what is essential in this form of dependency:

  • An increasing focus on the role of the State.

  • Lane: “Bringing the State Back In.”


ad