The art of argumentation
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

The Art of Argumentation PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 52 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The Art of Argumentation. Developing Arguments for the Science Classroom Kris Carroll CPDD. Agenda for SSI. What is an Argument? Variations in Argument: Types of Claims, Evidence, and Warrants Refining the Argument Fallacies in Reasoning: The Pitfalls in Arguing Our Intervention

Download Presentation

The Art of Argumentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The art of argumentation

The Art of Argumentation

Developing Arguments for the Science Classroom

Kris Carroll

CPDD

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Agenda for ssi

Agenda for SSI

  • What is an Argument?

  • Variations in Argument: Types of Claims, Evidence, and Warrants

  • Refining the Argument

  • Fallacies in Reasoning: The Pitfalls in Arguing

  • Our Intervention

  • Your Task

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


The art of argumentation

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


What is an argument

What is an Argument?

  • Argument- a stated position with support, for or against an idea or issue.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


What comprises an argument

What Comprises an Argument?

  • Stating a Claim

  • Providing Evidence

  • Giving Warrants

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


What is an argument stating a claim

What is an Argument?:Stating a Claim

  • Claim- also called a proposition; declares some state of affairs, often stated as a thesis statement.

    • Often referred to as the “conclusion” within science

    • Answers the question, “what are you trying to prove?”

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


What is an argument providing evidence

What is an Argument?:Providing Evidence

  • Evidence- material that provides grounds for belief in a claim.

    • Statistics

    • Testimony

    • Facts

    • Examples

    • Data

    • Graphs

    • Narratives

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Example

Example

  • Claim – You are guilt of a robbery.

  • Evidence – Your fingerprints are found at the crime scene.

  • Warrant – Is a rationale needed? Why?

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


What is an argument giving warrants

What is an Argument?:Giving Warrants

  • Warrant- a statement that provides the logical connection between some evidence and a claim.

  • Step-by-step method:

    • Write down the claim.

    • List each possible piece of evidence you have in support of the claim.

    • Write down the corresponding warrants that link the evidence to the claim.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


What is an argument the depth of the warrants

What is an Argument?:The Depth of the Warrants

  • Warrant- a statement that provides the logical connection between some evidence and a claim.

    • The warrant is the rationale, reason or why that explains the connection between the claim and the evidence.

    • The warrant is controlled by content knowledge.

    • Therefore, the warrant is governed by the individual’s past experiences.

    • The depth of the warrant is mediated by the cognitive and metacognitive process.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Variations in argument types of claims evidence and warrants

Variations in Argument: Types of Claims, Evidence, and Warrants

  • Types of Claims

  • Types of Evidence

  • Types of Warrants

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Variations in argument types of claims

Variations in Argument:Types of Claims

  • Claims of fact- focus on conditions that actually exist, existed, or will exist in the future.

  • Speculative claims- probable answers to questions for which no answers exist.

  • Claims of value- addressing issues of judgment.

  • Claims of policy- recommend a specific course of action to be taken.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Variations in argument types of evidence

Variations in Argument:Types of Evidence

  • Audience Knowledge and Opinions

  • Speaker Knowledge and Opinions

  • External Evidence

  • Tests of Evidence

    • relevance

    • timeliness

    • source credibility

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Variations in argument types of warrants

Variations in Argument:Types of Warrants

  • Motivational warrants- use the needs, desires, emotions, and values of audience.

  • Authoritative warrants- rely on an audience’s beliefs about the credibility or acceptability of a source of evidence.

  • Substantive warrants- operate on the basis of an audience’s beliefs about the reliability of factual evidence.

  • Warrants by cause- offer a cause and effect relationship as proof for a claim.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Variations in argument types of warrants1

Variations in Argument:Types of Warrants

  • Warrants by sign- infer that such a close relationship exists between two variables that the presence or action of one may be taken as the presence or action of the other.

  • Warrants by analogy- compare two similar cases and infer that what is true in one is true in the other.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Refining the argument

Refining the Argument

  • All attempts at persuasion are subject to counter-persuasion.

  • Inoculation effect- by anticipating counter-arguments and then addressing or rebutting them, you can “inoculate” your listeners against the “virus” of the viewpoints.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Fallacies in reasoning the pitfalls of arguing

Fallacies in Reasoning: The Pitfalls of Arguing

  • Fallacy- a false or erroneous statement, or an invalid or deceptive line of reasoning.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Fallacies in reasoning the pitfalls of arguing1

Fallacies in Reasoning: The Pitfalls of Arguing

  • Begging the Question

  • Bandwagoning

  • Overgeneralization

  • Ad Hominem Argument

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Fallacies in reasoning begging the question

Fallacies in Reasoning:Begging the Question

  • Stating in an impressive sounding way a claim that really has no substance at all.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Fallacies in reasoning bandwagoning

Fallacies in Reasoning:Bandwagoning

  • Assigning a claim greater substance by making it appear more popular than it really is.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Fallacies in reasoning overgeneralization

Fallacies in Reasoning:Overgeneralization

  • Attempts to support a claim by asserting that a particular piece of evidence is true for all persons concerned.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Fallacies in reasoning ad hominem argument

Fallacies in Reasoning:Ad Hominem Argument

  • Attacking an opponent instead of the opponent’s argument.

    • Attempting to incite an audience’s dislike for an opponent.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Why do we write lab reports

Why do we write lab reports?

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Purpose

Purpose

  • The lab report is a model of a scientific argument.

  • Critical thinking is supported and fostered through content knowledge.

  • A rationale (warrant) can be developed and enhanced with the strength of content knowledge.

  • The reason or rationale that connects claims and evidence is often unrepresented within the classroom. (REFLECTION)

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Parallels lab report vs argument

ParallelsLab Report vs Argument

  • Conclusion

  • Data & Analysis

  • Not represented

  • Claim

  • Evidence

  • Reason, Why & How

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Our intervention

Our Intervention

Evidence

Claim

Why, How, Reason and Rationale

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Science

Science

  • Professional Development is science, this is the model we are using to enhance content knowledge and develop meaning from the evidence to claim connection.

  • This mechanism was proven to enhance content knowledge. Crippen, 2009

  • The use of argumentation was shown to have a positive correlation with content knowledge. Critical thinking and content knowledge are directly related.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Examples develop an argument for

Examples: Develop an argument for…

  • Luck

    • Luck is being in the right place at the right time.

    • Winning MEGAbucks!

    • There is no possible explanation for winning megabucks other than chance and happenstance.

  • Non-Luck

    • Luck is when preparation meets opportunity.

    • Winning the WSOP

    • Winning the WSOP requires much skill, focused attention, patience, practice, and perseverance.

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Group practice

Group Practice

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Your student task

Your Student Task

Each day, you need to record in your notebook…

In:

What claims can you make about how ________ contributes to your understanding of __________.

Out:

What warrant can you explicitly draw from your claim and evidence connection from this activity?

OUT OCCURS AFTER ALL HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTS ARE DONE!

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


Your teacher task

Your Teacher Task

Each day, you need to record in your notebook…

Through out this institute there will be many activities, assignments and labs. Within these activities, what is the evidence and claim connection? Why or what is the rationale for the connection?

What knowledge base is described, standards addressed and connections to content are present?

Is the knowledge base robust enough, or will you need to further develop connections?

Curriculum & Professional Development Division, Science Health & Foreign Language June, 2009


  • Login