Why Prism

2. Why Prism • Ministers get little balanced, objective feedback. • Frequently, when there is no feedback, individuals become aware of problems and blind spots only after it is too late to correct them. • Prism lets a ministers hear from all corners of their ministry. • Prism is focused on development, not evaluation. • Prism data should be confidential and the participant given a high level of control over how it is used.

3. A Typical 360 Evaluation Supervisor Colleague Employee Colleague Subordinate Subordinate Subordinate

4. A Ministry 360 Evaluation Supervisor/ Mentor Minister Rater 1 Rater 4 Rater 2 Rater 3

5. A Ministry 360 Evaluation Can use three or four rater groups. District Superintendent UMC Minister Co-Ministers Committee Chairs SPRC Each group should have 3 to 5 raters. Direct Reports Fourth Optional

6. How it works • Individuals indicate their desire to participate. (your beta group) • They prints the planning form and select individuals who will provide feedback. • These may include supervisor, direct reports, co-ministers. • Three or four rater groups are planned.

8. How it works • Individuals indicate their desire to participate by registering with NACBA. • They prints the planning form and select individuals who will provide feedback. • These may include supervisor, direct reports, co-ministers. • Three or four rater groups are planned. • The Participants receive an email with a link to the rater setup page. • Using the link they enter the rater data via the web.

9. You’ve got mail! Hyperlink to setup feedback participants. Hyperlink to complete self assessment. • Participants receive an email with two hyperlinks. • The first link takes them to setup where their feedback list is entered. • The second takes them to the survey where they complete their self-assessment.

10. Participants enter rater groups via web Supervisor/Mentor Rater Group 1 Rater Group 2 Rater Group 3

11. How it works • Individuals indicate their desire to participate by registering with NACBA. • They prints the planning form and select individuals who will provide feedback. • These may include supervisor, direct reports, co-ministers. • Three or four rater groups are planned • The Participants receive an email with a link to the rater setup page. • Using the link they enter the rater data via the web. • After completing the setup page participants complete their self survey by following the second hyperlink in the setup email.

12. You’ve got mail! Hyperlink to complete self assessment. • Participants receive an email with two hyperlinks. • The first link takes them to setup where their feedback list is entered. • The second takes them to the survey where they complete their self-assessment.

13. User is asked to rate each question Four options:Don’t Know Not Applicable Improvement NeededStrength

14. How it works. • After completing the setup page participants complete self-surveys by following the second hyperlink in the setup email. • An email is sent to each feedback giver with directions to follow a hyperlink to their survey.

15. They’ve got mail! Hyperlink to complete the assessment. Feedback givers receive an email with hyperlinks directing them to complete the assessment. The e-mail comes from prism@pryorworks.com.

16. Feedback givers answer questions

17. How it works • After completing the setup page participants complete their self-survey by following the second hyperlink in the setup email. • An email is sent to each feedback giver with direction to a hyperlink to their survey. • After all responses are entered the complied data is reported to the facilitator and participant by printed report or transmitted via email in a PDF formatted report.

18. The Feedback Report is Printed

19. How it works • After completing the setup page the participants complete the self survey by following the second hyperlink in the setup email. • An email is sent to each feedback giving directing them to follow a hyperlink to their survey. • After all responses are entered the complied data is reported to the facilitator and participate by printed report or transmitted via email in a PDF formatted report. • The facilitator works with the participant to understand the data and create a development plan based on the information the participate has learned. The data belong to the participant and is only shared with others by the participant.

20. What Makes a Development Strategy? • Individualistic/customized • Individual must be in charge • Opportunistic (a pay-off) • A degree of risk – possibility of success or failure • Some sacrifice • People to influence whom you have no control • Watchful eye of a significant individual • Involves something new, developing new skills • Ongoing feedback • Multiple-strategies

21. What Makes a Developmental Plan Developmental?

22. Next Steps • Tomorrow you will receive the intro e-mail with two hyperlinks. • Firstlink will take you to the setup screen. When you have entered your raters email and clicked on submit your raters will receive an email within a few minutes. • Secondlink is a hyperlink that will take you to your self survey. It will take about 20 minutes to complete. Like all surveys it is best to go with your first and immediate response. • October 11 we will push out the invitation e-mail to the beta group. You should prepare them for this email and to select their rater groups. • October 18 you will receive your personal report and Dr Dan Pryor will lead you through a facilitators’ training.

23. QUESTIONS? For more information: www.nacba.net/prism or (800) 898-8085