1 / 24

Social Aspects of Dynamic Poverty Traps

Social Aspects of Dynamic Poverty Traps. Cases from Vihiga, Baringo and Marsabit Districts, Kenya Nelson Mango, Wesley Ongadi, Gatarwa Kariuki, & Josephat Cheng’ole. Research Team. Nelson Mango (ILRI), Gatarwa Kariuki (KARI), Josephat Cheng’ole (KARI), Wesley Ongadi (ICRAF/KEFRI)

olina
Download Presentation

Social Aspects of Dynamic Poverty Traps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Aspects of Dynamic Poverty Traps Cases from Vihiga, Baringo and Marsabit Districts, Kenya Nelson Mango, Wesley Ongadi, Gatarwa Kariuki, & Josephat Cheng’ole

  2. Research Team Nelson Mango (ILRI), Gatarwa Kariuki (KARI), Josephat Cheng’ole (KARI), Wesley Ongadi (ICRAF/KEFRI) Willis Oluoch K’Osura (UoN), Frank Place(ICRAF), Festus Murithi (KARI) Justin Wangila (ICRAF) Supported by: IDRC (Canada), BASIS/CRSP (USAID)

  3. Objectives 1. To characterize, identify, and analyze dynamic poverty processes using social and historical methods • By paying particular attention to changes in natural capital and human welfare dynamics

  4. Objectives cont…. 2. To identify existing and potential strategies for households to escape poverty traps and to understand the constraints in employing them.

  5. The research areas • Vihiga district - Madzuu (Mungoma) location • Baringo district - Ng’ambo location • Marsabit district - Dirib Gombo location:

  6. High potential agricultural zone Rainfall:1800mm-2000mm Pop. Density 800-1100/km square Av. Land sizes ½ ha per HH 25-29% HIV/AIDS prevalence Ethnicity: Maragolis Source: CBS, ILRI, 2003

  7. Low agricultural potential zone Low rainfall amounts per year 50-55mm monthly Pop. Density 76/km square Econ. Activity Livestock Keeping Ethnicity: Ilchamus Over 70% of the people are poor Source: CBS, ILRI, 2003

  8. Low Potential agricultural zone Low amounts of rainfall Pop. Density 38/km square Econ. activity: Keeping livestock Ethnicity: Boran (pastoralists) Burji (Mixed farmers) 50-60% people are poor Source: CBS, ILRI, 2003

  9. Research Methodology • The overall approach to the research was qualitative • Three step approach • Community level workshop • Case studies (Sampling & Techniques) • Interviews with key informants

  10. Community level workshop • PRA tools that were used included 1. Presentations and focused group discussions 2. Subgroup discussions and presentations 3. Historical timelines

  11. Workshop Cont…. 4. Seasonal calendars 5. Problem analysis 6. Problem trend lines 7. Wealth ranking and wellbeing analysis

  12. Case studies (sampling) • Purposive sampling technique 1. Poor – nonpoor 2. Nonpoor – poor 3. Poor – poor - increase - decrease - no change

  13. Sampling Cont…. 4. Nonpoor – Nonpoor - increase - decrease - no change

  14. Case studies (Techniques) • Ethnography • Critical events • Life histories • Listening to people’s narratives • Participant Observation • Oral histories

  15. Key Informants • Ethnography • Oral History • Reading of Texts

  16. Poverty Lines • Heavily indebted, poor housing, poor clothing, <3 meals/day, uncared for children and poor health (combined) (Vihiga). • Have <5 cattle, <5 goats and 5 sheep combined (Baringo). • Have <8 cattle, <4 acres of land and no oxen to plough (combined) (Marsabit).

  17. Reasons for escape from poverty • Education • Getting a well paying job in public or private sector • Diversification in on-farm and off-farm activities • Having a wider social network (clan support, farmer groups etc)

  18. Reasons for remaining Non-poor • Coming from a wealthy and stable family background • Self discipline (ability to control finances) • Ability to manage terror in the village (Vihiga) • Other reasons similar to those for escape from poverty

  19. Reasons for falling into poverty • Death of major income earner • Poor health and health related expenses • Heavy funeral expenses • Lose of employment • Reducing land sizes per household including grazing land

  20. Falling cont……. • Unproductive land • Increased dependencies (large family size) • Frequent droughts and floods (Marsabit & Baringo)

  21. Reasons for remaining poor • Coming from a poor background • Low levels of education and wrong mentality • Having very small unproductive land

  22. Remaining poor cont….. • Landlessness and lack of resources • Over reliance on livestock (Marsabit & Baringo) • Other reasons similar to those for falling into poverty

  23. Lessons learnt • Those who managed to escape from poverty and the non-poor tended to take care of the environment. • Reasons for falling into poverty tended to be different from reasons for escape from poverty • Human and social capital were determining factors in falling into poverty, escaping from poverty, remaining non-poor or poor

  24. Reflection on the research methods • Ethnography is a powerful tool for penetrating the society • Community level workshops brought people together to discuss with researchers their own situation. • First hand information generated remained with them • Other useful qualitative research techniques include extended situational analysis, genealogies etc.)

More Related