1 / 30

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Measurement Committee Year-End Report

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Measurement Committee Year-End Report December 6, 2005. HEDIS 2005 data are the most complete they have ever been 6 Commercial Plans reporting 5 Medicaid Plans reporting Participation with Save Lives Save Dollars

olina
Download Presentation

Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Measurement Committee Year-End Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium Measurement Committee Year-End Report December 6, 2005

  2. HEDIS 2005 data are the most complete they have ever been 6 Commercial Plans reporting 5 Medicaid Plans reporting Participation with Save Lives Save Dollars Creation and agreement re “lipid lowering agents” definition Accomplishments Year to Date

  3. Results were calculated using the disease population within each reporting Plan (sum of all numerators for all Plans divided by the sum of the denominators for all Plans). If a Plan rotated a HEDIS measure, the previous year’s denominator was used and the numerator was imputed based on the mean of the previous year’s rate and the following year’s rate. At least two (2) Plans had to provide data in order for an indicator to be included. Considerations for Data Analysis

  4. Comparison to “Best Practice” within MQIC Where should we be? Considerations for Data Analysis

  5. Based on administrative data only

  6. HEDIS reports a rolling average of two (2) years’ data (HEDIS 2004 and HEDIS 2005 comprise rolling average). This analysis shows separate levels for each year. Tobacco Control Considerations

  7. Questions? ? ? ? ? ?

More Related