1 / 12

Larimer County Solid Waste

Larimer County Solid Waste. Electronic Waste Issues and Solutions.

olencia
Download Presentation

Larimer County Solid Waste

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Larimer County Solid Waste Electronic Waste Issues and Solutions

  2. Awareness of electronic waste issues began to surface in Colorado around 1999. In 2000 the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) recycling pilot project was created by the State through legislation.Appendix C – statute CRS 25-17-105.5, “Pilot program – cathode ray tube product recycling”

  3. In 2001 CDPHE added electronic devices and electronic components to the Universal Waste rule. 6 CCR 1007 – 3 Section 273.2 (f)

  4. Due to the new Universal Waste rule Larimer County landfill restricted disposal of electronic waste. • Households • Businesses • Organizations

  5. A Need for Alternatives 2001 Partnership for one-day events. • City of Fort Collins, City of Loveland, Partners Program • Local vendor support • Great community support

  6. Statistics for one - day events • 2001 - 540 participants 50,000 pounds • 2002 - 963 participants 90,000 pounds • 2003 - 502 participants 50,000 pounds • 2004 - 872 participants 82,000 pounds

  7. While the one-day collections were successful, Larimer County sensed a need to offer more permanent opportunities to divert e-waste from the landfill.

  8. Brainstorming alternatives • Accepting e-scrap through the HHW • Creating a model similar to Eco-cycle • Working with CSU

  9. Adding e-waste to the HHW • Natural fit to existing program • Convenient • Mixed message • Burden to already busy program • Storage at site

  10. Creating a similar model to Eco-Cycle • Simple design • Possible partnership with local company • Local company didn’t buy in • Staff issues • Competition with the local recyclers

  11. Working with CSU • No storage issues, staffing issues • Minimal involvement • No control over choosing a recycler • Unsure of the exact role the county was to play

  12. The ending result Allowing Recycle America to offer a program was a good fit. • A program at the landfill • Didn’t burden HHW/landfill staff • Added to the local list of recyclers • National program with a good reputation

More Related