An historical perspective on aspects of spoken grammar
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 18

An historical perspective on aspects of spoken grammar PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 59 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

An historical perspective on aspects of spoken grammar. Ivor Timmis, Leeds Metropolitan University. Spoken Grammar Findings.

Download Presentation

An historical perspective on aspects of spoken grammar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


An historical perspective on aspects of spoken grammar

An historical perspective on aspects of spoken grammar

Ivor Timmis,

Leeds Metropolitan University


Spoken grammar findings

Spoken Grammar Findings

  • “...written-based grammars exclude features that occur widely in the conversation of native speakers of English, across speakers of different ages, sexes, dialect groups, and social classes, with a frequency and distribution that simply cannot be dismissed as aberration”

    McCarthy and Carter (1995: 142)


In from the cold

In from the cold?

  • Existential there and variable concord e.g. There’s some rum buggers in this town.

  • Right dislocation (or Tails) e.g. They all want throwing out, the government.

  • Left dislocation (or Heads) e.g. Most of these navvies, they come in here and have a pint you see.


An historical perspective

An historical perspective

“…a new description of a feature or a new perspective on a feature does not necessarily imply that the feature described is itself new or that it has recently acquired a new function” (Timmis 2010: 1).


The bolton corpus

The Bolton Corpus

  • Mass Observation: a sociological and anthropological movement founded in 1937 by Harrisson, Madge and Jennings

  • Aim: to assemble large teams of observers to make a detailed study of the behaviour and attitudes of the working classes

  • Bolton [Worktown] was a particular focus

  • ‘Overheards’, ‘Directs’, and ‘Indirects’


There s plural np

There’s + plural NP

  • There’s is most commonly selected form even when NP Complement is plural (Biber et al 1999; Carter 1999).

  • ETB concord variation is gaining prominence and acceptability (Cheshire 1999: 138).


Bolton corpus data 1937 1940

Bolton Corpus Data – 1937-1940

First child: There’s no dragons today

Second child: Yes, there is

C1: There’s not

C2: There is

C1: No, there’s not

C2: There is. Dragons eat people in Australia. There’s kangaroos there

C1: There’s not

C2: There are


Back in time

Back in time

  • 19th century NZE had non-standard -s in expletive there sentences; by 1900 non-standard -s was marginal; increased in C20 and is now robust in contemporary NZE (Rupp 205?)

  • …default singulars have existed in every century of the language e.g.

    There was many Dukes, Erles and Barons c.1533


Processing factors

Processing factors

  • Ruehlemann (2007) Ease of processing under real time constraints

  • Crawford (2005): “…the cognitive difficulty of maintaining long turns…”

  • Cheshire (1999: 137):

    “…existential there can be seen as a way for speakers to take the floor quickly and easily in lively conversation. Clearly it would be functional for such a useful construction to be shared and accessed as a prefabricated phrase….”


Linguistic factors

Linguistic factors

  • Trudgill (2008: 343): “It is agreed in linguistic typology that singular number is unmarked, as opposed to plural and other possible numbers, in all the languages of the world that have a number distinction…

  • Sobin (1997) – canonical concord with existential there is a learned alternative: a ‘grammatical virus’.


Tails

Tails

a)Noun alone can be a tail (Aijmer 1989)

  • They all want throwing out, the government.

    b) Demonstrative pronoun alone can be a tail (Aijmer 1989)

  • It’s going to be a long do, this.

    c) The tail can include an operator which follows the noun (Carter, Hughes and McCarthy 1998)

  • I think it’s a shame, a jolly outrage, I do.

    d) The tail can include an operator which precedes the noun (Carter, Hughes and McCarthy 1998)

  • Oh well, he’s a nuisance is that man.


Back in time1

Back in time

  • Durham (2007): tails in Victorian literature

  • Lambrecht (2001): ‘dislocation’ occurs across a wide range of different languages.


Tails retrospective clarification

Tails:retrospective clarification

  • Where did he come from, that bugler boy?

  • It’s awful, isn’t it, Tuesday night?

  • ‘[Tails] are attentive to the online management of interaction (Carter and McCarthy 1997: 409)


Tails evaluation

Tails: evaluation

Evaluation and tails (e.g. Aijmer 1989)

Around 50% of the tails in the Bolton corpus follow a clause in which there is an evaluative adjective ( e.g. ‘good’ 10 times)

e.g. She’s a good girl, that. She never grumbles whether thi’ lose or not.

Emotional colouring

e.g. rum, awful, shocking, numb, stiff, bloody [3]

e.g. nuisance, sluvvin [sloven], outrage, bestiality, bugger [3] and pillan [pillock].


Heads left dislocation

Heads (left dislocation)

  • Heads involve the utilisation of a topic slot before the core constituents of a canonical sentence (McCarthy and Carter 1995).

  • You wouldn’t think he could sleep in his bed. Hitler, he’s to blame for this.

  • Some of these lower class types, they don’t wash till Friday.


Back in time2

Back in time

  • Traugott (2007): examples of left dislocation in Old English

  • Lambrecht (2001): dislocation occurs in many other languages


Function of heads

Function of heads

  • Aijmer (1989): The main function of heads according to is to foreground a particular item,

  • McCarthy (1998: 77): Heads are “an act of consideration to the listener”

  • Carter and McCarthy (1995): Heads are especially common in the narrative genre.


Conclusion

Conclusion

  • The durability of non-canonical features may in part be explained from a functional perspective: processing factors; pragmatic functions

  • Language stability is at least as interesting as language change, and we are now in a position to research which are the most durable features in spoken language


  • Login