1 / 14

Building Committee Public Forum

Building Committee Public Forum. A presentation for the community and school board January 12, 2010. Who we are. 23 members total School administrative team, 4 board members and 9 community representatives Meetings are open to the public and advertised on the district’s website.

odette
Download Presentation

Building Committee Public Forum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building Committee Public Forum A presentation for the community and school board January 12, 2010

  2. Who we are • 23 members total • School administrative team, 4 board members and 9 community representatives • Meetings are open to the public and advertised on the district’s website. • Meeting notes are posted online, along with study and related documents

  3. What we’ve done so far • Reviewed 2008 feasibility study by Crabtree, Rohrbaugh & Associates • Discussed the amount of renovation needed at our schools, especially junior high and North Lincoln Hill. We must bring buildings up to code. • Gathered data: enrollment figures, operational costs, etc. • Split into three subcommittees to study the pros and cons of 5-, 4- and 3-building concepts. • Wallaceton-Boggs remains closed in all scenarios.

  4. Our current objective • We want to hear from you! • We need input on a critical question …

  5. Does the community support5 school buildings?4 school buildings?or 3 school buildings?

  6. 5-Building Plan – The Pros • Status quo is comfortable and eliminates need to explain changes • No vacant buildings in any community • Maintains current staffing • Teaming at Junior High • Smaller-school community • Teachers know all students • Auditorium at junior high

  7. 5-Building Plan – The Pros • Walkers at OME/NLH • Room to grow if student population increases And now for the cons …

  8. 5-Building Plan – The Cons • Cost of renovation - $27 - $30 million • Long-term operational costs • Inequity of class size and duplicated resources • JH/OME – little to no outside facilities • Multi-purpose space at NLH • High ceilings and hearing issue at JH • Code violations • Locked into K-6, 7-8, 9-12 format

  9. 4-Building Plan – The Pros • Closing a school saves costs, overhead • Possible new state-of-the-art Junior High/Middle School • Possible warehousing capability • Less sense of community loss because fewer schools would be closed than a 3-building plan • Possible relocation of district offices

  10. 4-Building Plan – The Pros • More PDE reimbursement (state funding) than a 5-building plan And now for the cons …

  11. 4-Building Plan – The Cons • Loss of a community school • Redistricting • Concerns about space/class size in a renovated building • Staff reductions • Long-term operational costs of 4 buildings are greater than 3 buildings

  12. 3-Building Plan – The Pros • Reduction in operating expenses • Sufficiently accommodates limited potential growth and equalizes class sizes • PDE reimbursement (state funding) • Fewer buildings slated for renovation • Possibility of closed schools becoming community centers • Less maintenance required And now for the cons …

  13. 3-Building Plan – The Cons • Limited growth capacity • Loss of 2 community schools • Excessive pressure on athletics, parking, traffic • Increased transportation costs • Lost historical significance of buildings in the school district.

  14. We need your input! • Community survey • Do you prefer 5, 4 or 3 school buildings?

More Related