1 / 22

VOC Emissions: Correlation between testing methodologies

VOC Emissions: Correlation between testing methodologies Dr. M Pharaoh, Dr. G.J.Williams, Ms. P Madden, Mr. N Reynolds W M G, University of Warwick M.Griffin (JLR). Background to the PARD programme and objectives Test programme, vehicles and micro-chamber

Download Presentation

VOC Emissions: Correlation between testing methodologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. VOC Emissions:Correlation between testing methodologies Dr. M Pharaoh, Dr. G.J.Williams, Ms. P Madden, Mr. N Reynolds W M G, University of Warwick M.Griffin (JLR)

  2. Background to the PARD programme and objectives Test programme, vehicles and micro-chamber Correlation: micro-chamber vs 1m3 chamber vs Vehicle Need Basic Comparison: overview of experimentation Experimentation. Decay work, flow rate work, temperature work Qualitative comparison Future Work VDA 276 Modelling, increasing complexity of system parameters. Contents

  3. PARD Programme background • The Premium Automotive Research and Development (PARD) Programme consists of a portfolio of research and development projects. • Programme set up in 2003 with project deliverables to be achieved by 2010 • It is aimed at enhancing the manufacturing and design capabilities of automotive supplier companies, particularly in the West Midlands. • The programme is supported by the Regional Development Agency, Advantage West Midlands together with numerous partner companies, including a lead partner, Jaguar & Land Rover. • The International Automotive Research Centre was set up in the University’s Warwick Manufacturing Group to host the programme • Project extension programme established early 2007 to run through to March 2008

  4. Background – PARD VIAQ Project • Objectives • Characterise vehicles and interior trim components against VIAQ limits • Identify realistic solutions to address any departures from VIAQ requirements. • Recommend suitable VIAQ test methodology and component performance specification. • Ensure effective dissemination of information to the project partners. • Achievements • Initial component evaluations have shown direct correlation with vehicle assessments • Assessment methodology has been developed for both vehicles and components. • Outputs from project work will be used within JLR materials specifications • A facility has been established to provide detailed analyses for project partners

  5. Objectives for PARD Extension • Determine correlation between accelerated microanalysis and recognised industry standards to measure component and materials emissions levels. • Conduct detailed investigation to minimise VOC emissions from identified components • Extend engagement to other potential partners and respective supply chains

  6. VIAQ drivers • LegislativeThe last 3 years have seen increased focus in this area and regulatory requirements for 2008 for certain markets looks inevitable. • From April 1st, 2007, JAMA Voluntary Agreement for vehicle interior air quality - 13 VOC’s (volatile organic compounds) to be monitored at 40°C. • China has signalled an intent to introduce VIAQ legislation (based upon JAMA voluntary agreement for 2007/2008 implementation) • Other Industries legislate in this area (e.g. construction industry) • Competitive • Concern exists regarding excessive exposure to VOCs causing occupant illnesses • National voluntary codes of conduct and anticipated legislation

  7. Single µ- CTEChamber Assembly Sample tube • Micro-chamber • Diameter 45 mm • Depth 28 mm • Volume ~45 cm3 • The µ-CTE contains 6 Chambers in Total Either as a cell or chamber Heated air/gas supply • Heated block • Temps. up to 120°C • Flow controlling device • 10 – 500 ml/min Air/gas manifold supplying all 6 μ-Chambers

  8. Correlation • Many tests available. Ease supplier load. • Ultimately want to be able to predict the performance of the vehicle from u-cte and VDA 276 type results. • Minimise VOC levels and ‘take control’ of odour.

  9. u-cte vs 1m3 chamber vs vehicle. Emission rate over time compared to volumetric analyses. Effect of air flow over material surface Re-adsorption onto surfaces local material in-homogeneities Temperature variation Manufacturing process Effect may vary with volatile type Data Comparison

  10. Basic Equation • VDA 276. 1m3 full component data = • u-cte data for test temperature and surface air flow • x % for each substrate layer • x % for air exchange • x % reduction for age of materials (decay) • humidity effects • Test time differential • Mechanism for emission and surface interactions

  11. Surface air flow Rapid Removal of VOCs Air Diffusion Still air: surface boundary layer Bulk diffusion Bulk Material: - Density - Surface area - Molecular weights Surface Interactions

  12. Decay Data: Foams – 40C

  13. Decay Data: PVC coverings – 40C

  14. Temperature Data: VOCs

  15. Temperature Data: VOCs and Rate

  16. Temperature data: types of VOC

  17. Qualitative Comparison: Easy U-cte vs large chamber

  18. sampling VOC levels minus Air exchange Nominal chamber concentration Oven conditioning Sample conditioning period Steady state period Time during test Virtual Flux

  19. Data Conclusions • u-cte gives good reproducibility • decay data shows a strong dependence on the material properties, more than VOC molecular weight • strong temperature dependence: 2 x no. of volatiles, particularly of high Molecular weight and 10 x VOC emission rate • temperature effect of different test methods • sampling and storage protocol: potential for rapid decay means storage prior to testing in very important • manufacturing variability, our work shows there is a need for improved control of VOCs during production

  20. Future Work • extensive test programme about to start on 1m3 chamber with the focus on VDA276 • detailed work looking at greater depth on determining parameters: temperature, air flow, decay and material properties • fluid dynamics and diffusion modelling of the system • OEM consortium in place to develop common approach to testing • Supplier work • Continuing assessment of supplier materials • Follow on looking at manufacturing variability • Development of low VOC materials

  21. Premium Automotive Research and Development Programme Environmental CompetenceProject

More Related