Incorporating Traditional Tools with New Technology: The Reaction of Computer Generated Organizers for students with Special Needs. GSE 550 Educational Technology Wendy Davies. Times have changed…have you?. Introduction.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Incorporating Traditional Tools with New Technology:The Reaction of Computer Generated Organizers for students with Special Needs
All can be created for free online
“the use of lines, arrows, and a spatial arrangement that describe text content, structure, and key conceptual relationships” (Darch & Eaves, 1986)
Biklen, D., & Schubert, A. (1991). New Words The Communication of Students with
Autism. Remedial and Special Education, 12(6), 46-57.
Blair, R. B., Ormsbee, C., & Brandes, J. (2002, March). Using writing
strategies and visual thinking software to enhance the written performance of students with mild disabilities. In No childleft behind: The vital role of rural schools, 22nd Annual National Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES). Reno, Nevada: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
Boon, R. T., Fore, C., & Rasheed, S. (2007). Students' Attitudes and Perceptions
toward Technology-Based Applications and Guided Notes Instruction in High
School World History Classrooms. Reading Improvement, 44(1), 23-31.
Brahier, D. J. (2005). Teaching secondary and middle school mathematics (2nd ed.).
New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Brown, M. (2011). Effects of Graphic Organizers on Student Achievement in the
Writing Process. Online Submission.
Darch, C., & Eaves, R. (1986). Visual display to increase comprehension of high-school learning-disabled students. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 309–318.
Douglas, K. H., Ayres, K. M., Langone, J., & Bramlett, V. (2011). The Effectiveness of Electronic Text and Pictorial Graphic Organizers to Improve Comprehension Related to Functional Skills. Journal Of Special Education Technology, 26(1), 43-56.
Driscoll, M. P. (2004). Psychology of learning for instruction. (Second edition).
Needham Heights, MA.: Allyn-Bacon, Inc
Horton, S., Lovitt, T., & Slocum, T. (1988). Teaching geography to high school
students with academic deficits:Effects of a computerized map tutorial. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(4), 371-379.
Novak J. D. & Cañas A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to
Construct Them (Technical Report No. IHMC CmapTools 2006-01). Pensacola,
FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
Sturm, J. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). Effects of Hand-Drawn and Computer-
Generated Concept Mapping on the Expository Writing of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 17(2), 124-39.
Unzueta, C. H., & Barbetta, P. M. (2012). The Effects of Computer Graphic Organizers
on the Persuasive Writing of Hispanic Middle School Students with Specific
Learning Disabilities. Journal Of Special Education Technology, 27(3), 15-30.
Thank you for your attention!