interactive white boards do they positively impact education
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Interactive White Boards Do They Positively Impact Education?

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 18

Interactive White Boards Do They Positively Impact Education? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Interactive White Boards Do They Positively Impact Education?. By: Sheri Cooper & Lauren Townsend. Advantages of IWBs. Advantages for Students. Increased Participation Increased Motivation Opportunity to delve into complex and abstract subjects. Advantages for Teachers. Flexibility

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Interactive White Boards Do They Positively Impact Education?' - nydia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
advantages for students
Advantages for Students
  • Increased Participation
  • Increased Motivation
  • Opportunity to delve into complex and abstract subjects
advantages for teachers
Advantages for Teachers
  • Flexibility
  • Multiple Resources
  • Reaches multiple and diverse students
disadvantages for students
Disadvantages for Students
  • Quickly lose appeal
  • Less time on content
  • One note lessons
disadvantages for teachers
Disadvantages for Teachers
  • Technical Issues
  • Teacher Training
  • Shifts attention from student to technology
effectiveness of smart board technology1
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology
  • As a tool for non-linear learning
    • By accessing text and media
    • Ability to move back and forth among pages
    • Ability to present the same information in different ways
effectiveness of smart board technology2
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology
  • Combines the benefits of interactive computer use with group learning
    • Internet access
    • Videos
    • Large screen
effectiveness of smart board technology3
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology
  • As a tool for multi-modal teaching
    • Descriptive
    • Experimental
    • Mathematical
    • Figurative
    • Kinesthetic
effectiveness of smart board technology4
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology
  • As a tool for teaching children with disabilities
    • Manipulatives
    • Auditory and Visual Cues
    • Interactive video
    • Various assessment strategies
effective use of smart board technology1
Effective Use of Smart Board Technology
  • Must have adequate training and time to find appropriate software
    • Provide incentives to increase IWB skills
    • Vendor training
    • In-service training
    • Tutorials
    • Cooperative learning among teachers
effective use of smart board technology2
Effective Use of Smart Board Technology
  • must be an integral part of the lesson, not something tacked on to be fun
    • Create lessons on the IWB
    • Use features in the software

Akbas, O., & Pektas, H. M. (2011). The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2)

  • Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469. doi:10.1080/00131910500279551
  • Betteney, M. (2009). Interactive white boards. English 4--11, (35), 3-5.
  • Blau, I. (2011). Teachers for "Smart Classrooms": The Extent of Implementation of an Interactive Whiteboard-based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers\' Instructional Practices. Interdisciplinary Journal Of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 7275-289.
  • Campbell, M. L., & Mechling, L. C. (2009). Small Group Computer-Assisted Instruction With SMART Board Technology : An Investigation of Observational and Incidental Learning of Nontarget Information. Remedial & Special Education, 30(1), 47-57.
  • Giles, R. M., & Shaw, E. L. (2011). SMART boards ROCK! Science and Children, 49(4), 36-37.
  • Harden-Thew, K. (2012). Transition to school, success and an interactive whiteboard. Practically Primary, 17(1), 34-36.
  • How to afford interactive whiteboards. (2011). Technology & Learning, 31(8), 44-46.
  • Jang, S., & Tsai, M. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327- 338. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
  • Manny-Ikan, E., Tikochinski, T. B., Zorman, R., & Dagan, O. (2011). Using the interactive white board in teaching and learning - an evaluation of the SMART CLASSROOM pilot project. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 7, 249-273.

McNamara-Cabral, M. (2012). Idea bank: How a smart board changed my teaching. Music Educators Journal, 98(3), 26-27. doi: 10.1177/0027432112439669

  • Murcia, K. (2010). Multi-modal representations in primary science: What\'s offered by interactive whiteboard technology. Teaching Science: The Journal Of The Australian Science Teachers Association, 56(1), 23-29.
  • Şad, S. N., [email protected] (2012). An attitude scale for smart board use in education: Validity and reliability studies. Computers & Education, 58(3), 900-907. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.017
  • Şad, S., & Özhan, U. (2012). Honeymoon with IWBs: A qualitative insight in primary students\' views on instruction with interactive whiteboard. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1184-1191. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.010
  • Türel, Y., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers\' Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381-394.
  • Whitby, P. S., Leininger, M. L., & Grillo, K. (2012). Tips for Using Interactive Whiteboards to Increase Participation of Students With Disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(6), 50-57.
  • Xin, J. F., & Sutman, F. X. (2011). Using the smart board in teaching social stories to students with autism. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(4), 18-24.