Interactive white boards do they positively impact education
Download
1 / 18

Interactive White Boards Do They Positively Impact Education? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 109 Views
  • Uploaded on

Interactive White Boards Do They Positively Impact Education?. By: Sheri Cooper & Lauren Townsend. Advantages of IWBs. Advantages for Students. Increased Participation Increased Motivation Opportunity to delve into complex and abstract subjects. Advantages for Teachers. Flexibility

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Interactive White Boards Do They Positively Impact Education?' - nydia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Interactive white boards do they positively impact education

Interactive White BoardsDo They Positively Impact Education?

By: Sheri Cooper&

Lauren Townsend


Advantages of iwbs

Advantages of IWBs


Advantages for students
Advantages for Students

  • Increased Participation

  • Increased Motivation

  • Opportunity to delve into complex and abstract subjects


Advantages for teachers
Advantages for Teachers

  • Flexibility

  • Multiple Resources

  • Reaches multiple and diverse students



Disadvantages for students
Disadvantages for Students

  • Quickly lose appeal

  • Less time on content

  • One note lessons


Disadvantages for teachers
Disadvantages for Teachers

  • Technical Issues

  • Teacher Training

  • Shifts attention from student to technology



Effectiveness of smart board technology1
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology

  • As a tool for non-linear learning

    • By accessing text and media

    • Ability to move back and forth among pages

    • Ability to present the same information in different ways


Effectiveness of smart board technology2
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology

  • Combines the benefits of interactive computer use with group learning

    • Internet access

    • Videos

    • Large screen


Effectiveness of smart board technology3
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology

  • As a tool for multi-modal teaching

    • Descriptive

    • Experimental

    • Mathematical

    • Figurative

    • Kinesthetic


Effectiveness of smart board technology4
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology

  • As a tool for teaching children with disabilities

    • Manipulatives

    • Auditory and Visual Cues

    • Interactive video

    • Various assessment strategies



Effective use of smart board technology1
Effective Use of Smart Board Technology

  • Must have adequate training and time to find appropriate software

    • Provide incentives to increase IWB skills

    • Vendor training

    • In-service training

    • Tutorials

    • Cooperative learning among teachers


Effective use of smart board technology2
Effective Use of Smart Board Technology

  • must be an integral part of the lesson, not something tacked on to be fun

    • Create lessons on the IWB

    • Use features in the software



  • Akbas, O., & Pektas, H. M. (2011). The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2)

  • Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469. doi:10.1080/00131910500279551

  • Betteney, M. (2009). Interactive white boards. English 4--11, (35), 3-5.

  • Blau, I. (2011). Teachers for "Smart Classrooms": The Extent of Implementation of an Interactive Whiteboard-based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers' Instructional Practices. Interdisciplinary Journal Of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 7275-289.

  • Campbell, M. L., & Mechling, L. C. (2009). Small Group Computer-Assisted Instruction With SMART Board Technology : An Investigation of Observational and Incidental Learning of Nontarget Information. Remedial & Special Education, 30(1), 47-57.

  • Giles, R. M., & Shaw, E. L. (2011). SMART boards ROCK! Science and Children, 49(4), 36-37.

  • Harden-Thew, K. (2012). Transition to school, success and an interactive whiteboard. Practically Primary, 17(1), 34-36.

  • How to afford interactive whiteboards. (2011). Technology & Learning, 31(8), 44-46.

  • Jang, S., & Tsai, M. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327- 338. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003

  • Manny-Ikan, E., Tikochinski, T. B., Zorman, R., & Dagan, O. (2011). Using the interactive white board in teaching and learning - an evaluation of the SMART CLASSROOM pilot project. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 7, 249-273.


  • McNamara-Cabral, M. (2012). Idea bank: How a smart board changed my teaching. Music Educators Journal, 98(3), 26-27. doi: 10.1177/0027432112439669

  • Murcia, K. (2010). Multi-modal representations in primary science: What's offered by interactive whiteboard technology. Teaching Science: The Journal Of The Australian Science Teachers Association, 56(1), 23-29.

  • Şad, S. N., [email protected] (2012). An attitude scale for smart board use in education: Validity and reliability studies. Computers & Education, 58(3), 900-907. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.017

  • Şad, S., & Özhan, U. (2012). Honeymoon with IWBs: A qualitative insight in primary students' views on instruction with interactive whiteboard. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1184-1191. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.010

  • Türel, Y., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers' Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381-394.

  • Whitby, P. S., Leininger, M. L., & Grillo, K. (2012). Tips for Using Interactive Whiteboards to Increase Participation of Students With Disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(6), 50-57.

  • Xin, J. F., & Sutman, F. X. (2011). Using the smart board in teaching social stories to students with autism. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(4), 18-24.


ad