html5-img
1 / 43

Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay

Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay. The central interferometer. Spring 2001- Summer 2002 . BS. Test of the technical choices during end of the construction . Acquire experience (no prototype in the Virgo community) . Technical choice validation. Suspensions

nuwa
Download Presentation

Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Virgo commissioning statusM.BarsugliaLAL Orsay

  2. The central interferometer Spring 2001- Summer 2002 BS Test of the technical choices during end of the construction Acquire experience (no prototype in the Virgo community)

  3. Technical choice validation • Suspensions • long term operation, robustness. • direct measurement of the attenuation at 4 Hz • hierarchical control (top stage, reference mass) • Digital controls • local controls, control of SA resonances, lock acquisition, WFS • Output mode-cleaner • locking, contrast improvement • Local controls

  4. Suspension system Top stage Last stage Seismic filters

  5. Detection system

  6. OMC locking Transmitted power TEM00 TEM00 TEM00 TEM00 c2 signal

  7. CITF sensitivity during e-runs Alignment control Sept 2001 Frequency noise July 2002

  8. Lock robustness during e-runs Run #losses duty cycle longest lock E0 1 98% ~ 51 h E1 1 85%~ 27 h E2 3 98%~ 41 h E3 4 98%~ 40 h E4 4 73% ~ 14 h ITF stored power ~ 200 W

  9. July 2002  September 2003: Upgrade to Virgo • mirrors installation • arm completion, vacuum • ITF upgrades (mode-cleaner, local controls, …) • September 2003: Virgo commissioning

  10. Commissioning plan • North arm • Lock acquisition • output mode-cleaner • 3-days engineering run • frequency stabilization • WFS • hierarchical control (top stage, marionetta, reference mass) • West arm • Recombined ITF • full ITF

  11. Interferometer operation: shifts • 2 8-hours shifts during commissioning Morning Shift (8h-15h) Evening Shift (16h-23h) Task #1 Task #2 1 Interferometer operator 1 Interferometer operator 1 Interferometer coordinator 1 Computer operator 1-3 People working on commissioning task #1 1-3 People working on commissioning task #2 Daily meeting (15h-16h) • 2 tasks in parallel

  12. PR BS • 1 pole at 0.01 Hz • 2 zeros at 10 Hz • 2 poles at 800 Hz • 1 pole at 1000 Hz |Gain| frequency Hz North cavity locking scheme • angular control (pitch, yaw) • no longitudinal damping ~ 6 W 50 Hz BW, digital control

  13. m Signals and simulation Lock acquisition speed threshold ~ 10 mm/s Linearized error signal No Linearized error signal Correction Transmitted P Time domain Simulation (Siesta)

  14. locking • Locking at the first trial • first lock ~ 1 hour • frequency noise Transmitted power Frequency noise reduction

  15. Lock acquisition statistics • with the linearized error signal • 24 locking events collected locking and delocking the cavity • 23 lock acquisition at the first attempt, only 1 failed locking attempt

  16. Lock acquisition statistics • Relative velocity between the mirrors computed for each locking attempt 2.5mm/s: mean value of the velocity • 8mm/s: maximum velocity for the lock acquisition success • 12.5 mm/s: velocity of the failed event Failed locking attempt v ~ 12.5 8

  17. Output mode-cleaner locking c 2 Reflected P Transmitted P 2 min Error signal State Temperature

  18. Sensitivity (m/Hz) Before OMC After OMC Output mode-cleaner locking -II 1. Cavity locked with ~ 1% of the light 2. Mode-cleaner locked 3. Control transferred to this phd ~ 99% of the light

  19. Control noise ? Frequency noise MC length control noise Electronic noise (ADC) Shot noise North cavity noise budget

  20. Ref Cav laser 300 kHz 50 Hz 50 Hz

  21. Transmitted P during C1 run 3 days 14-17 november Seismic Noise problem 2 Long locks tests

  22. Seismic noise problem • large seismic noise during the run @300 mHz (microseismic peak) • new inertial control scheme “less inertial” • marionetta roll resonance at 300 mHz excited • new local controls: sensing coupling rollyaw • solution found new inertial damping filter, in test.

  23. Tidals during C1 run Correction sent to the end test mass 50 mm

  24. Commissioning plan • North arm • Lock acquisition • output mode-cleaner • 3-days engineering run • frequency stabilization • WFS • hierarchical control • West arm • Recombined ITF • full ITF

  25. Ref Cav laser 300 kHz Frequency stabilization 50 Hz 50 Hz

  26. Ref Cav laser 300 kHz Frequency stabilization • 3 actions: • unlock reference cavity • change IMC curved mirror locking point • open second stage of frequency stabilization 50 Hz 50 Hz 10 kHz

  27. Ref Cav laser 300 kHz Frequency stabilization Last step: DC control of laser frequency 1 Hz 50 Hz 20 kHz.

  28. Frequency stabilization: first tests Cavity trans P Test mass corr Cavity err sig 2nd stage ON 2nd stage ON Cavity corr OFF • switch • oscillations • simulink model

  29. WFS control matrix • optical matrix measured • filter ready

  30. WSF control

  31. WFS control matrix • optical matrix measured • filter ready • will be tested in early january • transition from local controls  WSF control

  32. 2nd (west) arm locking Error signal Transmitted power • cavity locked in a stable way yesterday • same algorithm, same filter of north cavity • preliminary analysis of 2 cavities optical properties

  33. Commissioning plan • North arm • lock acquisition • output mode-cleaner • 3-days engineering run • frequency stabilization • WFS • hierarchical control (top stage, marionetta, reference mass) • West arm • Recombined ITF • full ITF

  34. Hierarchical control: 3 points

  35. Force applied to mirror No feedback to top stage 3.5 mN with feedback to top stage Hierarchical control: top stage Slow corrections (f < 70 mHz) Done during the CITF commissioning Fast corrections (f > 70 mHz)

  36. Hierarchical control: marionetta • acquire the lock with the reference mass • move the control to the marionettaDAC noise reduction • complicated transfer function  simulations

  37. Commissioning plan • North arm • Lock acquisition • output mode-cleaner • 3-days engineering run • frequency stabilization • WFS • hierarchical control • West arm • Recombined ITF (january) • full ITF

  38. Recombined ITF B8 • start noise analysis west arm ~ 250 mW north arm B7 B5 B1p B2

  39. Lock acquisition B8 Step 1: lock north arm using pick-off 5 Done Step 2: lock west and mich B7 B5 B1p B2

  40. Recombined ITF: simulation north cavity locked west cavity locked mic locked Acq_north ON Acq_west_mic ON Trigger west&mic satisfied Trigger north satisfied

  41. Commissioning plan • North arm • Locking, output mode-cleaner (done) • 3-days engineering run • frequency stabilization, WFS (in progress) • hierarchical control (top stage, marionetta, reference mass) • West arm (in progress) • Recombined ITF (january) • full ITF

  42. Lock acquisition for full ITF • Lock acquisition LIGO method • Time-Domain simulation (Siesta) • Now transition 34 State 2 locked State 3 locked

  43. Summary • North arm • Lock acquisition (done) • output mode-cleaner (done) • 3-days engineering run (done) • frequency stabilization (in progress) • WFS (in progress) • hierarchical control (january) • West arm (done) • Recombined ITF (starts december 29th) • full ITF (?) • Science (?)

More Related