1 / 27

Resolving Sources of Dissolved Organic Matter in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta by Radiocarbon Dating

This presentation discusses the use of radiocarbon dating to identify the sources of dissolved organic matter in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The researchers utilize isotopes and standard watershed analysis to address environmental problems in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

nschofield
Download Presentation

Resolving Sources of Dissolved Organic Matter in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta by Radiocarbon Dating

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Resolving sources of dissolved organic matter in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta by radiocarbon dating James O. Sickman Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida Carol DiGiorgio California Department of Water Resources M. Lee Davisson Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Delores Lucero University of Florida Erin Waites Department of Water Resources Presented at: October 2004 CALFED Science Conference

  2. I am an interdisciplinary scientist working in and across the fields of biogeochemistry, limnology and watershed science My research program is focused on biogeochemical cycling of C, N and P in lakes, rivers and wetlands In these terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems I utilize standard watershed analysis along with application of isotopes ( e.g., d15N and d18O of nitrate, d13C, D14C of dissolved organic matter) to solve environmental problems Who am I? Watersheds Limnology My Research Biogeochemistry

  3. Education: Ph.D., Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology (emphasis in biogeochemistry and limnology) University of California, Santa Barbara, 2001 M.A., Aquatic and Population Biology University of California, Santa Barbara B.A., Aquatic Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara Work Experience: 2004 – present: Assistant Professor. Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida-IFAS. Biogeochemistry of rivers, lakes and wetlands 2003 – 2004: Assistant Professor. Department of Geology and Geophysics. University of New Orleans. Watershed biogeochemistry and ecosystem restoration in the Mississippi Delta and Sacramento River Delta 2001 – 2003: Senior Environmental Scientist - California Department of Water Resources, Division of Environmental Services, Sacramento, California. Carbon biogeochemistry, AMS carbon dating, aquatic ecological processes and water-quality investigations of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and State Water Project 1983 – 2001: Staff Research Associate IV. Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara. Global-change research on biogeochemistry, aquatic ecology and hydrology of the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountains. Education and Work History

  4. Current Research: California C&N Biogeochemistry of Montane Watersheds Aquatic Ecology of Oligotrophic Lakes Effects of Seasonal Transitions on Biogeochemistry of Chaparral DOM Sources and Fate in Rivers and Estuaries

  5. Causes of macroalgae blooms in Florida springs (J. Stevenson, A. Pinowska MSU; R. Reddy UF) Impacts of Melaleuca quinquenervia invasion on soil biogeochemical properties (M. Martin UF, P. Tipping USDA) Sources of DOM to St Johns and Caloosahatchee Rivers (M. Fisher SJRMD, TJ Evens USDA) Current Research: Florida

  6. Spring 2005: SOS 6456 Advanced Biogeochemistry (3 credits) TOPIC: Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change: Sustaining Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Soils and Sediments PREREQUISITES: Graduate standing, BSC 2011 and 2011L (population biology) or equivalent, AND SOS 3022 (soil chemistry ) or equivalent COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course will present an in-depth treatment of global elemental cycles in the context of Global Change. Topics that will be covered include properties of and transfers between the key reservoirs of C, N, S & P, coupling of biogeochemical cycles and climate, and human modification of the Earth System. Discussion of ecosystem services provided by soils and sediments in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems will be emphasized Teaching: Current Courses (1)

  7. Fall 2005: SOS 4932 Environmental Biogeochemistry (3 credits) PREREQUISITES: BSC 2010 and 2010L (general biology) or equivalent, AND CHM 2045 and 2045L (general chemistry) or equivalent COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course will examine the biogeochemical systems of the Earth for the past 5 billion years. We will consider the effects of life on the Earth's chemistry on a global scale, emphasizing the impact of humans in altering the global biogeochemical cycles of C, N, S, and P. The course will examine several important, but complex questions regarding the Earth System: 1) How did the Earth System operate in the absence of significant human influence? 2) How can human-driven effects on global biogeochemical cycles be discerned from those due to natural variability? 3) What are the implications of changes in the Earth’s biogeochemical systems for human well-being? 4.) How robust are the Earth’s biogeochemical systems in the face of anthropogenic forcings? Topics that will be covered include element cycling, coupled biogeochemical cycles, and solutions for global change including economic valuation of natural ecosystem functions. Teaching: Current Courses (2)

  8. SOS 4XXX/5XXX: Watershed Science and Analysis COURSE DESCRIPTION: Given the interconnectedness of watersheds and the integrating influence of hydrology, watersheds are a fundamental scale at which to study and manage ecosystems. Watershed science is an interdisciplinary field that incorporates fundamental and applied knowledge of natural sciences (hydrology, geomorphology, chemistry, biology, geology) and social sciences (law, environmental policy and resource economics). This course will provide advanced training in concepts, tools and methods for solving watershed-scale problems. It will consist of a combination of lecture, field work and laboratory analyses. A local watershed will be used as the focus of the course. Topics to be covered: 1. Introduction to watershed science 2. Field/lab methods in watershed analysis 3. Remote sensing and GIS 4. Geomorphology 5. Hydrologic and hydrochemical modeling 6. Biogeochemistry of watersheds 7. Use of environmental isotopes in watershed science 8. Watersheds in environmental policy and regulation 9. Environmental monitoring, databases and analysis Teaching: Planned Course (3) John Wesley Powell, renowned explorer of the Grand Canyon defines a watershed as "that area of land, a bounded hydrologic system, within which all living things are inextricably linked by their common water course and where, as humans settled, simple logic demanded that they become part of a community”

  9. Isotopes of Carbon and Their Abundance

  10. Radiocarbon Basics http://www.rlaha.ox.ac.uk/orau/calibration.html

  11. Invented by Willard F. Libby of the University of Chicago after the end of World War 2. Libby later received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1960 for the radiocarbon discovery History of Radiocarbon Dating Shroud of Turin (AD 1260-1390) http://www.c14dating.com/k12.html

  12. Managing water quality and the ecological health of the Delta affects all of California Flow in and through the Delta: • Comprises 70% of annual California runoff • Supplies drinking water to 23 million people • Maintains agricultural vitality of California economy Evolving concerns over past 50 years: • Primary conduit for state water project flows • Expanding role for environmental flows • Increasing degradation of water quality Principal quality problems related to: • Salinity, agricultural wastes, local land use, and conflicting flow management strategies California’s Delta region exhibits elements common to agricultural/urban areas of Florida

  13. How do we restore habitat, without: high organic loads leading to carcinogenic by-products formed during drinking water treatment carcinogen levels increase proportionally with organic matter content natural wetlands have 5-10X more organic matter than Delta today EPA STAGE 1 D/DBP RULE ON THE HORIZON bioaccumulating toxic metals that impact fish: wetland chemistry promotes bioavailability of mercury and selenium Increasing salinity in municipal and agricultural supplies 2-5X increase in bromide renders chlorinated water undrinkable Promoting land subsidence Restoration of Delta may have unwanted consequences for water quality The CALFED Restoration mission is to balance ecological, agricultural, and urban demands, but Carbon runoff from agricultural practices is a growing concern for water quality

  14. The Dynamic Delta Landscape Presents Unique Challenges for Drinking Water Quality Today Wetland Forest Grasses Banks Pumping Plant Urban Historic Agricultural CO2 DOC Organic-rich soils Wetland DOM is a precursor to disinfection byproducts in finished drinking water DOM likely originates from modern and historical sources Relative proportions of different sources will vary during water year

  15. Determination of Delta Island DOM Influence at Banks Can Isotopic fingerprinting determine if: Delta island peat is a significant source of C loading to the State WaterProject? C inputs from Delta island peat vary through time depending on seasonal and hydrologic conditions?

  16. Simple Conceptual Model for DOM Sources to the State Water Project Riverine DOM Peat-derived DOM State Water Project

  17. Sampling and Analysis • Monthly sampling: • Rivers • Ag drains • Periodic sampling: • Urban runoff • DOM Fractionation • Measurements: • AMS carbon dating • C, N and S isotopes • SUVA • THMFP • Water fingerprinting using DSM2 model Emphasis to date has been on DOM fractionation and radiocarbon measurements

  18. DOM Fractionation Procedure isotopes measured Combustion/Extraction Isolation Columns Fractionation favors isolation of hydrophobic compounds (humics) which tend to be more refractory Longer environmental persistence of these hydrophobic compounds may correlate to radiocarbon age. After Aiken et al. (1992)

  19. Fractionation Data

  20. Radiocarbon Comparison of Surface DOM and Soil Organic Matter 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.10 1.00 (Fraction Modern Carbon) Fraction Modern Carbon (fmc) fraction modern carbon Source DOC XAD-8 Sacramento R 1.07, 1.10 San Joaquin R 1.09, 1.10 Old R 1.08, 1.53 Cache Cr 0.89 Missouri R 0.94-1.14 0.87-0.99 Mississippi R 1.06-1.09 *Hudson R 0.84-0.96 Others 1.06-1.11 0.77-1.40 Delta Island Soil Organic Matter 0.38-0.89 from Davisson (2002) * from Raymond and Bauer (2000) Accelerator Mass Spectrometry

  21. River XAD-8 Fractions Are Younger Than Ag Drain Water April-Oct 2003 Whole WaterXAD 8

  22. Calculated 14C abundance in non-XAD-8 DOC fractions indicate old or possibly fossil carbon sources

  23. Sac. River and Aqueduct 14C abundance of XAD-8 fraction closely track each other Jones Tract Breach June 2003 Aqueduct Sac. River

  24. Simple Mass Balance Mixing Model Tends to Under-Predict 14C abundance of XAD-8 DOC Fraction linear mixing model *Input Flows Sac. River SJ River Ag Drains Other Streams * Based on DSM2 daily mass flow estimates for all major Delta inflows

  25. Implications from Simple Mass Balance Modeling Delta Island agricultural drainage has minimum influence on DOC at Banks Increasing flow contributions from eastside of Delta or San Joaquin River cannot account for 14C discrepancy Modern-aged carbon is added to the XAD-8 fraction between Hood and Banks SUVA (L/mg-m) THMFP (µmol/mmol C) Sac. River 2.13 7.45 Aqueduct 2.83 9.08

  26. Conclusions For Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, whole water DOM predominantly has lower radiocarbon content than corresponding XAD-8 fractions The non-XAD-8 portion of DOM in these river waters suggest old or fossil carbon inputs Sacramento River and San Joaquin River have younger XAD-8 fractions than Delta Island agricultural drain waters A conservative mixing model for DOM at Banks predicts older carbon than is observed for most samples thus far Results suggest young carbon is added between Hood and Banks, which may explain increases in SUVA and THMFP

  27. Acknowledgements Funding provided by the CALFED Bay Delta Program, State Water Project Contractors and Department of Water Resources Twitchell Island Banks Pumping Plant

More Related