1 / 5

Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country

Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country Frederic Knecht Rulemaking Directorate EASA. Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country.

nowles
Download Presentation

Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country Frederic Knecht Rulemaking Directorate EASA

  2. Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country For aircraft registered in a Member State and operated in a third country: • EU regulation 2042/2003 applies because of Article 1.1(a) when the State of Registry has not transferred the responsibility per Article 1.2. • Article 1.3 states: “the provision of this regulation (2042/2003) related to commercial air transport (CAT) are applicable to licensed air carrier as defined by the Community law”. • The provisions of CAT do not apply because the operator in a third country is not a licensed air carrier as defined by the Community law (EEC) No 1008/08 of 24 September 2008 (recast of2407/92 of 23 July 1992)

  3. Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country • However, according to the legal services of the Commission, even when the provisions of CAT do not apply, those aircraft are still considered as being involved in CAT and the opt-outs for aircraft not involved in CAT cannot be used. As a consequence (assuming that we are talking about large aircraft): since 28 September 2005: • the contract with a CAMO approved in accordance with subpart-G. • and the maintenance in Part-145 AMO are required.

  4. Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country Regarding the contract with the CAMO. • If it is a CAMO located in a Member State, this CAMO may perform airworthiness review (when it has been granted the additional privilege G+I) and issue the ARC or a recommendation for the authority to issue the ARC. • If it is a CAMO located in a third country, it cannot have the privilege to perform airworthiness reviews. • One option would be that a CAMO located in a Member State with privileges G+I performs the airworthiness review and issues a recommendation. However, this is not practical because it requires another additional contract.

  5. Aircraft registered in a Member State and used by an operator located in a third country A solution has been introduced in the new regulation 1056/2008, in: • For aircraft not involved in CAT (as per the interpretation of the Commission): • Paragraph M.A.901(i)1: The authority of the State of Registry may perform the airworthiness review and issue the ARC for aircraft managed by a foreign CAMO. • Then, per new M.A.901(f), the foreign CAMO managing the aircraft may extend twice for a period of 1 year each time the ARC. • For aircraft involved in CAT: • There would be a need that once every three years an EU CAMO issues a recommendation and the authority issues the ARC. • Then, per new M.A.901(f), the foreign CAMO managing the aircraft may extend twice for a period of 1 year each timethe ARC.

More Related