1 / 45

Chestatee Elementary

Chestatee Elementary. Forsyth County, Georgia. Real Time Information for RTI & POI. Chestatee Elementary Obstacles and Solutions for 2006-2007. Does Not Meet AYP 2 new AP’s No accommodations for SWD

nova
Download Presentation

Chestatee Elementary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chestatee Elementary Forsyth County, Georgia Real Time Information for RTI & POI

  2. Chestatee Elementary Obstacles and Solutions for 2006-2007 • Does Not Meet AYP • 2 new AP’s • No accommodations for SWD • Rethinking the SST Process ( Mandatory meeting on each child a minimum of 3 times per year.)195 in grades K-2, 275 in grades 3-5 SST • Data Driven Decisions using Buckledown other assessments • 88 in grades K-2 , 136 in grades 3-5 SST referrals for 2006-2007

  3. IDEIA 2004-05 RegulationsDec. 3, 2004 § 300.307 Specific learning disabilities. • General. A State must adopt criteria for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability….the criteria adopted by the State- (2) May not require the use of a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability as defined in § 300.8: (‘Discrepancy’ Model) (3) Must permit the use of a process that determines if the child responds to scientific, research-based intervention…(‘RTI’ Model). Note: (bracketed comments added) • The child with a specific learning disability ….must be directly related to a pervasive processing deficit and to the child’s response to scientific, research-based interventions….This is clearly documented by the child’s response to instruction as demonstrated by a review of the progress monitoring in general education and Student Support Team intervention plans…. Georgia Regulations (2) The child with a specific learning disability ….must be directly related to a pervasive processing deficit and to the child’s response to scientific, research-based interventions….This is clearly documented by the child’s response to instruction as demonstrated by a review of the progress monitoring in general education and Student Support Team intervention plans….

  4. RTI Training • Summer Team Training • Reflection on Chestatee Process • Leadership Retreat Set Goals How to present RTI to the Faculty Changes to the SST Process – Volume • Presentation to the Faculty

  5. Thinking Ahead… Discussion Points • Who will be our Leadership Team Representative for next year? • How did our curriculum maps, map out? Revise? What type of support do we need related to our maps? • What were our biggest academic challenges this year? • What specific topic(s) would we like to explore during 07-08 staff development? • What worked well for us this year?

  6. Pyramid of Intervention Chestatee Elementary 2007-2008

  7. SST Teams 3-5 K-2 April McNaughton Jennifer Vanderbunt Shelly Otis Sonia Stewart Melton/Reynolds Melton/ Reynolds Lori Holbrooks Veronica Learned Classroom Teacher Classroom Teacher Case Manager Case Manager

  8. Pyramid of Interventions 5% Tier IV 5% (22% - 224 students) Tier III Response to Intervention 10% Tier II 100 % 1025 enrolled Tier I

  9. RTI: A familiar approach

  10. High leverage strategies Standards-based instruction Differentiated Instruction Universal Screening and/or Benchmark Assessment Small group instruction for all students Tier I – For ALL students

  11. AIMS Web – http://www.aimsweb.com/

  12. Universal Screening

  13. Edusoft Data Management Program – http://www.edusoft.com

  14. Tier II -Instructional Support Team

  15. Think Pair Share

  16. Tier III - Student Support Team (SST)

  17. Tier IV -Special Education

  18. 6 Critical Components -John McCook • Universal screening administered to ALL students 3 times per year • Identify the problem areas in measurable terms • Establish baseline data

  19. 6 Critical Components -John McCook • Develop an accountability plan • Description of specific intervention • The duration • Schedule and setting of implementation • Person responsible • Measurable outcomes • Progress Monitoring • Schedule progress monitoring • Evaluate the plan (Conducted in IST meetings and SST meetings)

  20. Focus – Tier II • Students with marked difficulties • May include: • At or below 10th percentile on universal screening • Level 1 on CRCT in Reading and/or Math • DNM on Georgia Writing Assessment • Retention • Excessive discipline referrals

  21. Focus – Tier III • Students that have not responded to Tier II efforts, i.e. • 3 or more data points show no improvement or less than expected growth • Level 1 on CRCT

  22. RTI Spread Sheet

  23. Grade Level ______________ Date _____________ IST Plan ___________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ IST Log is ___ attached ____under construction Children that our team needs assistance with what tier to place them. _________________________ ________________________ _________________________ ________________________ _________________________ ________________________ _________________________ ________________________ Checklist of things to accomplish today: ____ Determine plan for IST meeting ____ Discuss what you want your IST log to look like ____ Look at data and complete Tier activity For existing SST folders: ___ Place dark orange sticker in the upper right hand corner of an SST folder; IF the child is staying in tier 3 (SST). ____ Place a yellow sticker in the upper right hand corner of an SST folder; IF the student is a tier 2 (IST) ____ Place a green sticker in the upper right hand corner of an SST folder; IF the student is a tier 1. (This will mean that the folder will be closed )

  24. How to make the tough decisions

  25. TIER II Research based programs and/or interventions Examples SRA Harcourt Trophies Saxon Phonics & Spelling HM Expressions TIER III Research based programs and/or interventions Examples Orton-Gillingham SRA Trans Math Language! Programs – MUST be conducted with FIDELITY

  26. Tier II Minimum of 30 minutes / day, 2 days per week; in addition to core instruction Minimum of 6-12 weeks or based on the research based program Tier III Minimum of 30 minutes / day, increase in days per week; in addition to core instruction Minimum of 12 weeks or based on the research based program Time

  27. K-2 Tier II Only 3-5 Tier II, Title, EIP Progress monitoring every 4 weeks as a minimum Tier III Progress monitoring every 2 weeks Assessment

  28. Team Discussions • IST/SST Meeting Concerns • Communication to stake holders • Documentation of IST meetings

  29. IST Process • Meetings are conducted at Grade Level Meetings. • Students are updated on the IST Log located on our Share Drive. • AP will attend all IST Meetings.

  30. SST Process • The majority of SST meetings will take place on Tuesday and Thursdays. • There will be 2 SST teams ( K-2) and (3-5) • Each team will meet bi-weekly to determine the SST Goals for all students. Follow-ups will occur every 4-7 weeks according to the student need. • Subs will be provided for classroom teacher and the case manager. • 10-12 Student Meetings per day

  31. Intervention Examples Read Naturally SRA 2nd Dose of Small Group Intervention Readers Theatre Paired Reading Peer Tutor Program – http://www.interventioncentral.org Touch Math Houghton Mifflin Expressions Math Manipulative Groups Use of Technology to review skills Orton Gillingham Language! 3rd Ed. TransMath Earobics

  32. Tier II Documentation SheetChestatee Elementary 2007-2008 Student_______________________________________ Grade______________ Teacher_____________________________________________ Date__________________ Case Manager_____________________________ Standards Based Concerns: (Please be specific.) 1.______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 2.______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ What data supports the existence of the problem/concern? ________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ What is the goal to resolve this problem? ______________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Parent Contact: No_________ Yes________ If so, when:__________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  33. 2nd Grade IST Student Information Student: _____________________ Today’s date: ______________ Classroom teacher: ______________ Case Manager: __________________ IST start date: _________ Absences: ___ / ____ CRCT scores- Reading: ______ ELA: ______ Math: ______ STAR reading level: beginning: _____ current: _____

  34. IST and SST Log

  35. Chestatee Elementary IST/SST Documentation

  36. Professional Learning • Aug. 29th – RTI Overview and Data Meeting • Sept. 26th - AIMS Web Report Training EIP/Title Teachers P.M. Training • Oct. 9th – Speech/ESOL collaborates with RTI • Nov. 1st – Behavior Interventions for RTI • Nov. 14th – Refresher on SST Data Collection and Referral Process • January 7th – Data Analysis • Jan 30th – Math Toolbox • March 5th – Double Dose Strategies for Effective Intervention • April 30th - RTI Culmination- Planning Ahead for 2008-2009

  37. January 7, 2007Data Analysis Professional Learning Data Analysis + Intervention Inventory = RTI Putting a face to the data

  38. Green > 65 % on BuckleDown 3 on Standards Based Report Card Yellow > 51-65% on BuckleDown 2 on Standards Based Report Card ~ 50 NPR on ITBS Red < 50 % on BuckleDown 1 on Standards Based Report Card < 40 NPR on ITBS Multiple Measures Reading ELA Math

  39. Reading ELA Math Current Interventions:

  40. What else can I do? Specialized Instructional Planning

  41. January 7, 2007Data Analysis Professional Learning What resources have we not thought of? Results of Professional Learning • All teachers concluded the PL with a road map to interventions for their class • 80+ students receiving additional services • 6+ teachers volunteering for additional morning or afternoon duties • 8 teachers taking on additional small group instruction • Principal tracking attendance and data of small groups to insure fidelity • AP’s conduction motivational groups weekly

  42. Question&Answer

More Related