Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

Tribunals and Alternative Dispute Resolution PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 86 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Tribunals and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Topic 11. Tribunals. Courts Judicial review Was the decision lawfully made Tribunals Merits review Was the decision a good decision?. Merits review. Important check and balance on role of decision makers Consider decision afresh

Download Presentation

Tribunals and Alternative Dispute Resolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution

Tribunals and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Topic 11


Tribunals

Tribunals

  • Courts

    • Judicial review

    • Was the decision lawfully made

  • Tribunals

    • Merits review

    • Was the decision a good decision?


Merits review

Merits review

  • Important check and balance on role of decision makers

  • Consider decision afresh

  • Example of Administrative Appeals Tribunal


Administrative appeals tribunal

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

  • Unique in the common law world

  • General tribunal for the review of administrative decisions

  • Over 90 members with the jurisdiction to review administrative decisions made under more than 400 Acts of Parliament

  • Appeals lie to the Federal Court


Drake v minister for immigration and ethnic affairs 1979 24 alr 577 at 589 per bowen cj and deane j

Drake v Minister for Immigrationand Ethnic Affairs(1979) 24 ALR 577 at 589 per Bowen CJ and Deane J:

“The question for the determination of the Tribunal is not whether the decision which the decision maker made was the correct or preferable one on the material before him. The question for the determination of the Tribunal is whether that decision was the correct or preferable one on the material before the Tribunal.”


Federal judicial review

Federal Judicial Review

  • Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)

  • Federal Court

  • Appeals from AAT – but not merits review

  • s75(v) Constitution – High Court jurisdiction


Nsw tribunals

NSW Tribunals

Administrative Decisions Tribunal

  • Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (NSW) s3 includes:

    • make decisions at first instance

    • Review decisions made by administrators

    • Ensure accessibility, efficiency, effectiveness and fairness

    • Proceedings to be informal and expeditious


Administrative decisions tribunal

Administrative Decisions Tribunal

  • General Division

  • Community Services Division

  • Revenue Division

  • Legal Services Division

  • Equal Opportunity Division

  • Retail Leases Division


Administrative decisions tribunal1

Administrative Decisions Tribunal

  • Two jurisdictions:

    • Reviewable decisions

    • Original decisions – analogous to civil suits


Alternative dispute resolution

Alternative Dispute Resolution


Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution

ADR

  • Litigation has been the traditional focus of dispute resolution, but often not the only appropriate form of dispute resolution

  • ‘Alternative’ forms of dispute resolution becoming increasingly important

  • Both Courts (s71) and ADR methods such as conciliation and arbitration (s51(xxxv)) recognised in Constitution


Adr same as court

ADR same as Court?

  • ADR not just a different type of court

  • Court: exercises the judicial power of the State

  • Tribunal: exercises executive (and sometimes judicial) power of the State

  • ADR: may be voluntary/may be binding – depends on agreement between parties

  • ADR: often a private contractual arrangement


Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution

ADR

  • “Alternative” – can convey these dispute resolution methods are of secondary importance

  • Additional?

  • Litigation alternative to ‘traditional’ mortal combat?

  • “Dispute resolution” as a range of options (including litigation) – select most appropriate to circumstances and client


Development of adr in australia

Development of ADR in Australia

Three key events:

  • Establishment of the Family Law Court

  • Establishment of Community Justice Centres in NSW

  • Establishment of the Australian Commercial Disputes Centre


Family law court

Family Law Court

  • Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

    • designed to be informal and incorporate pre-trial processes such as counselling and conferences

  • Family Law Reform Act 1995 (Cth)

    • ADR designated “primary dispute resolution”

    • Funded community based services such as Relationships Australia and Centacare

    • Broad view of dispute and methods of resolution


Community justice centres nsw

Community Justice Centres - NSW

  • Community Justice Centres (NSW Pilot Project) Act 1980 (NSW)

  • pioneered use of mediation in public issue disputes, victim offender mediation (conferencing) and family mediation.

  • resolve disputes through mediation, free of charge to members of the public

  • Spurred development of Lawyers Engaged in ADR (LEADR)


Australian commercial disputes centre

Australian Commercial Disputes Centre

  • Company established with government assistance

  • Successful in fostering use of ADR techniques, especially mediation, in commercial disputes

  • Government response to ADR now largely seen in legislative ADR schemes


Adr definitions

ADR - definitions

  • Accurate, comprehensive definitions can be difficult

  • National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council – NADRAC

  • “processes, other than judicial determination, in which an impartial person assists those in a dispute to resolve the issues between them.”


Nadrac definitions

NADRAC definitions

  • Facilitative processes: an ADR practitioner assists the parties to a dispute to identify the disputed issues, develop options, consider alternatives and endeavour to reach an agreement about some issues or the whole dispute. E.g. mediation, facilitation and facilitated negotiation.

  • Advisory processes: an ADR practitioner considers and appraises the dispute and provides advice as to the facts of the dispute, the law, and in some cases, possible or desirable outcomes and how these may be achieved. E.g. expert appraisal, case appraisal, case presentation, mini-trial and early neutral evaluation.


Nadrac definitions1

NADRAC definitions

  • Determinative processes: ADR practitioner evaluates the dispute and makes a determination. E.g. arbitration, expert determination and private judging.

  • Combined or hybrid processes: ADR practitioner may play multiple roles. E.g. in conciliation and in conferencing, the ADR practitioner may facilitate discussions, as well as provide advice on the merits of the dispute. In hybrid processes, such as med-arb, the practitioner first uses one process (mediation) and then a different one (arbitration).


Why adr

Why ADR?

  • Benefits for clients

    • Cost – usually cheaper

    • Time – usually faster

    • Relationships – can be preserved. Consider the effect of litigation on relationships. Court system always adversarial.

  • Benefits for courts

    • Pre-trial/case management processes reduce workload of court

    • Reduces costs and delays across the system


Why adr1

Why ADR?

  • Effective in achieving lasting settlement of disputes

    • Parties actively engaged

    • Avoids ‘winners’ and ‘losers’

    • ALRC report: “70.6% of the mediation agreements with monetary settlement were reported to be paid in full, compared to 33.8% of the adjudications.”


Why adr2

Why ADR?

  • Promoted by government as best practice

    • Commonwealth Legal Services Directions 2005

    • ‘model litigants’ - endeavour to avoid, prevent and limit the scope of litigation wherever possible.

  • Professional obligation?

    • Should be able to advise clients about all options and best options.


Federal approach to adr

Federal approach to ADR

Some ADR required by legislation prior to any claim in:

  • Federal Court (Federal Court of Australia Act 1976)

  • Family Court of Australia (Family Law Act 1975)

  • Federal Magistrates Court (Federal Magistrates Act 1999)

  • Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986)

  • Australian Industrial Relations Commission (Workplace Relations Act 1996)

  • Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975)

  • National Native Title Tribunal (Native Title Act 1993)

  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (Trade Practices Act 1974), and

  • Social Security Appeals Tribunal (Social Security Act 1991).


State approach to adr

State approach to ADR

  • Similar approach at State level

  • e.g. Supreme Court Practice Note SC Gen 6

  • “The Court’s power does not depend on the consent of the parties, or of any of the parties”


Types of adr

Types of ADR

  • Negotiation

  • Mediation

  • Neutral Evaluation

  • Conciliation

  • Expert Referral

  • Arbitration

  • Family Dispute Resolution

  • Ombudsmen

  • Youth Justice Conferencing

  • Circle Sentencing


Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution

  • Negotiation

    • Conflict of interests between parties

    • No established rules to resolve conflict

    • Parties are seeking agreement

    • May or may not involve third party

  • Mediation

    • Generally involves the use of a trained, neutral third party

    • Process – oriented: mediator facilitates

    • Substance – oriented: mediator offers recommendations


Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution

  • Neutral evaluation

    • Neutral evaluator seeks to identify and reduce the issues of fact and law which are in dispute

    • Offers opinion as to likely outcome of dispute

    • Similar to a mini-trial

  • Conciliation

    • Parties, with the assistance of neutral conciliator, identify issues and develop options and alternatives

    • Conciliator advises but does not determine


Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution

  • Expert referral

    • Usually established by legislation

    • Expert panels used by State courts and tribunals

  • Arbitration

    • Formal dispute resolution process governed by Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (NSW) or equivalents

    • Binding determination

    • Also industrial arbitration


Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution

  • Family Dispute Resolution

    • Independent practitioner assists those separated or divorced, or considering separation or divorce to resolve some or all of disputes

    • Operates in Family Law context and designed to avoid Court altogether (where possible).

    • Now required prior to seeking any Family Court order relating to a child

  • Ombudsmen

    • Established in many government departments and some private industries


Tribunals and alternative dispute resolution

  • Youth Justice Conferencing

    • Example of ADR in criminal context

    • NSW scheme to divert young offenders from the courts by requiring them to meet the victim of their behaviour

    • Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW)

  • Circle Sentencing

    • Current NSW trial

    • Designed to empower the Aboriginal community in the sentencing process

    • Punishment to be a community sanction


  • Login