Confidentiality information sharing
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Confidentiality & Information Sharing PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 67 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Confidentiality & Information Sharing. Paul Farmer Director of Public Affairs (thanks to Dr. Vanessa Pinfold Rethink Research Manager). Overview. The issues Carers Needs Confidentiality & Information sharing Where next?. The Issues. Overview of mental health care

Download Presentation

Confidentiality & Information Sharing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Confidentiality information sharing

Confidentiality & Information Sharing

Paul Farmer

Director of Public Affairs

(thanks to Dr. Vanessa Pinfold

Rethink Research Manager)


Overview

Overview

  • The issues

  • Carers Needs

  • Confidentiality & Information sharing

  • Where next?


The issues

The Issues

  • Overview of mental health care

  • Carers’ policy initiatives

  • User, carer, professional?

  • A changing landscape


The experience of severe mental illness

The experience of severe mental illness

  • stigma

  • personal denial

  • professional denial/delayed intervention

  • traumatic start

  • poor treatment

  • partial care

  • dehumanising attitudes

  • written off


Carers views

Carers’ views

  • 47% of carers say mental health care for carers has improved in last 3 years

  • 49% of carers say mental health care for users has improved in last 3 years


Regional variations

Regional variations

  • Midlands best at 58%

  • North 52%

  • South West 52%

  • Eastern 48%

  • South East 43%

  • London worst at 41%


Carers who feel valued by professionals

Carers who feel valued by professionals


Top carer frustrations

Top carer frustrations

  • 30% shortage of adequate services locally

  • 16% access in a crisis

  • 14% access to mental health professionals

  • 11% quality of mental health care staff

  • 10% treatment of carers by professionals


A final flurry

A final flurry

  • One in six carers say they have no local support services

  • One in four carers have been denied help in the last three years

  • One in four carers feel they don’t have enough information to help them


Why research

Why research?

“On my son’s discharge from hospital after an episode of acute psychosis we had no information about his condition, how he would behave, how we should react to him. We had no experience in dealing with him when unwell. We were expected to just cope – a complete nightmare!”

(Carer)


Rethink survey 2003

Rethink Survey 2003


Why research1

Why research?

“Service user’s voice may be silenced by professionals and carers believing that they always know best. Also, depends on the quality of the professional and carer – very difficult to generalise” (Service User)

“I think sometimes staff are worried about saying the wrong thing I.e. don’t know what language to use, are frightened of upsetting the carer, and aren’t sure what they can and cannot share” (CPN)


Solutions required

Solutions required…

  • Government commitment to supporting carers through information sharing

  • Policy guidance mixed

  • Practice reportedly poor

    • Frustrated carers

    • Professionals lacking confidence

    • Service users lacking trust


Our approach

Our approach?

  • National Study

    • Rethink severe mental illness

    • Institute of psychiatry

    • Other partner organisations including MACA, Mind, Eating Disorders Association, Age Concern

  • Four Stakeholder groups

    • Service users

    • Carers

    • Mental health professionals

    • Carer Support Workers


Research method

Research Method

  • Policy and literature reviews

  • National Survey

  • In-depth interviews

  • Group visits

  • Two multi-disciplinary workshops

  • Expert panel providing guidance and critical comment


What we found

What we found?

KEY ISSUES

  • Consent and communication

  • Balancing ethical principles

  • No blue print solution – individual strategies required

  • Recognition of carer role

  • Understanding difference between general information and personal/sensitive info

  • Professional judgement


Contrasting perspectives national survey good practice recommendations

Contrasting perspectives? National Survey – Good Practice Recommendations


Service users

Service Users

  • Consent should be collected before information is shared with carers, including the use of advance agreements;

  • Better communication in mental health based upon openness, honesty and respect between all stakeholders;

  • Carer involvement should not diminish service user wishes;

  • Service users should be involved in decisions to invite carers to meetings;


Carers

Carers

  • Access to general information

  • Skills to support them in their caring role

  • Opportunities to discuss information with staff

  • Supportive explanations provided when info cannot be shared because consent is withheld

  • Cultural shift in professional attitudes towards working with families

  • Strategies to support carers where service user is an in-patient

  • Carer pro-activity


Professionals

Professionals

  • Local policy guidance required

  • Recognition of carer role by professionals;

  • Mental health system should address practical constraints restricting Prof involvement with carers;

  • Professionals need training in the application of confidentiality;

  • Consent to be collected and reviewed routinely;

  • Supports delivered to carers including carers assessments and general information packs;

  • Improvements in communication between all stakeholder groups

  • Collaborative approach

  • Consider impact of information sharing on carers and provide support as appropriate (esp Dementia)


Recommendations

Recommendations

Basic Framework:

I: Practical Actions – Carers, SU, Prof

II: Supportive Structures

III: Good Practice Principles

IV: Decision making (values and judgements)


Principles

Principles

  • Consent

  • Effective communication

  • Service user empowerment

  • Carer empowerment, recognition carer role

  • Respect wishes of others

  • Collaboration

  • Openness and honesty

  • Recognition of caring context

  • Assessment

  • Ethical balance – need to know / rights to privacy


Structures

Structures

  • Advance statements – consent to disclose

  • General info resource kit for carers

  • Accredited carer training

  • Accredited professional training and support

  • Quality mental health services

  • Provision of services for carers

  • Legal clarity: rights of carers, definition of carers, professional codes

  • Carer strategy, policy and guidance

  • Clinical governance audits of carer involvement

  • Carer and SU decision making in service planning

  • Services allow professionals time to work with carers


Actions

Actions

Good practice in assessment

  • Holistic assessment of caring context;

  • Assess the capacity of the service user and carer to understand the shared information;

  • Assess carers’ needs and their ability to use and manage the information provided;

  • Thorough risk assessment of both service user and carer circumstances to assess carers ‘need to know’ and the likely risks to carer (carer protection policy);

  • Incorporate carer assessments into routine practice


Actions1

Actions

Consent

  • The status of SU consent and capacity

  • Any known advance wishes;

  • The identity of the main carer and significant others who may be supporting or liaising on behalf of the carer;

  • The role of the identified carer where the service user’s judgement is impaired either permanently or temporarily;

  • The nature and extent of information necessary to support the particular care context;

  • The risks involved in disclosing or not disclosing information;

  • Duties under the law, courts and tribunals;

  • Responsibilities where there are known risks regarding the health and/or safety of the service user and others.


Actions2

Actions

Where consent is withheld:

Balance service user and carer needs – decisions to ‘break confidentiality based upon professional judgement

Where confidentiality is breached decision should be:

  • Discussed with colleagues

  • Documented in notes

  • Service user informed as appropriate

    Consider solutions that do not involve breaking of confidentiality


Actions3

Actions

The disclosure process

  • Differentiate between general and personal info

  • Assess carer context and type of relationship

  • Keep SU informed of how their info is shared

    Training and education

    Meetings protocol

    First points of contact – hospitals and GPs

    Specific strategies supporting carers with dementia


Next steps

Next Steps

“No matter what recommendations are produced with regard to confidentiality there must be a will on the part of the local authorities and front-line professionals to provide as much information to the carer as possible, and this should be reflected in professional training, because without this positive mindset the carer will be disadvantaged” (Carer Expert Panel Member)

“Possibly the most important thing about sharing is once you have you can’t change things, you only get once chance, so it has to be right” (SU Expert Panel Member)


Next steps1

Next Steps

  • NSF Review

  • Mental Health Bill/Mental Capacity Bill

  • Implementing best practice

  • Holding the tensions

  • We’re in this together


  • Login