1 / 14

Ann E. Austin Michigan State University Second International Conference Oxford University April, 2008

Preparing New Doctoral Students for Academic Practice: Cultivating New Students’ Scholarly Identity and Practice through Cognitive Apprenticeship. Ann E. Austin Michigan State University Second International Conference Oxford University April, 2008.

nonnie
Download Presentation

Ann E. Austin Michigan State University Second International Conference Oxford University April, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preparing New Doctoral Students for Academic Practice:Cultivating New Students’ Scholarly Identity and Practice through Cognitive Apprenticeship Ann E. Austin Michigan State University Second International Conference Oxford University April, 2008

  2. Doctoral Education as Anticipatory Socialization • Definition of Socialization • Merton, Reader, & Kendall: “the processes through which [a person] develops [a sense of] professional self, with its characteristic values, attitudes, knowledge, and skills…” • Weidman, Twale, & Stein: Offered a framework to understand socialization in doctoral education • Students learn knowledge and skills • Interact with faculty and peers • Integrate into activities of their fields

  3. Concerns about Doctoral Education • Lack of systematic, developmentally organized preparation experiences • Lack of clear expectations and feedback • Limited attention to academic and non-academic careers • Concerns about advisors and sense of community • Limited opportunities for “guided reflection”

  4. Theory of Cognitive Apprenticeship • A framework for teaching and learning in doctoral education that may enhance the socialization process • “A model of instruction that works to make things visible” (Collins, Brown, & Holum, 1991) • Comparison to Traditional Apprenticeship • Thinking is less easily observable process • Involves work that is separated from situation where it may occur • Skills must be transferrable

  5. Practice of Cognitive Apprenticeship • Modeling: • Providing demonstration • Scaffolding: • Offering suggestions, diagnoses, feedback • Coaching: • Guiding students to do more complex work • Articulation and Reflection: • Helping students ask questions and articulate processes of thinking • Promoting Transfer of Learning: • Helping students see wide applicability in diverse settings • Importance of Learning Context: • Encouraging active engagement in a community of scholars

  6. Cognitive Apprenticeship and Doctoral Education • Using a teaching approach informed by the theory of cognitive apprenticeship helps provide: • More systematic preparation • More focused guidance and scaffolding • More explicit feedback • Preparation for being part of a community of scholars

  7. Case Example:First-Year Seminar Higher, Adult, and Lifelong Education • Purpose of Course • Increase students’ familiarity with history, key concepts, questions, and literatures relevant to scholars and practitioners of higher and adult education • Help entering doctoral students enhance their abilities in the areas of critical reading, critical thinking and analysis, writing, and inquiry

  8. Practice 1:Making Explicit the Challenges, Responsibilities, and Opportunities of Doctoral Education • Help students make productive transition into doctoral education, develop identities as scholars, and deepen abilities as thinkers and writers • Make explicit the ways of thinking, habits, and abilities associated with productive scholarly work in the field

  9. Practice 2:Guiding Students through the Process of Creating a “Mini-Research Proposal” • The goal is to help students understand the research process • Students frame problems, identify questions, develop literature review • Scaffold process with guidance and feedback • Provide examples • Model thinking • Provide coaching—feedback, individual mtgs. • Emphasize transfer—practice conference talks

  10. Practice 3: Coupling Purposefulness with Flexibility • Adjust work to student needs • Emphasize Articulation and Reflection • Short written reflections • Mid-semester feedback • Students self-assess • Students provide feedback to each other

  11. Practice 4:Cultivating a Community of Scholars • Discuss and develop learning community • Respect for and support of others’ learning • Mutual responsibility for quality of class • Strategies: • Writing groups • Practice giving feedback

  12. Practice 5: Creating an Environment of High Expectations and High Support • Expect excellence and hard work from everyone—students and faculty • High support—accessibility of teacher, openness to conversation • Mutual respect

  13. Results/Outcomes • Strong positive results • Self-confidence • Gains in ability to conceptualize important porblems and frame relevant questions • Example: “The teacher …modeled behaviors—ways of responding to people, ways of presenting one’s own ideas so that the door is open to other ideas, ways of bringing up contradictory evidence for mutual consideration instead of blunt disagreement.”

  14. Concluding Thoughts • Cognitive apprenticeship • a theory about how learning occurs and specific ways in which teaching practice can enhance the learning process • A very useful theory in explaining aspects of how doctoral students learn to think as scholars • Practical implications for teaching practice

More Related