1 / 38

Industry Fellows Bridging the Industry-Academic Divide

Industry Fellows Bridging the Industry-Academic Divide. Josh Tenenberg Computing and Software Systems University of Washington, Tacoma. The Industry Fellows Model. Outline. The Video What does pairing a teacher and industry professional enable? Impact on students Design Principles.

Download Presentation

Industry Fellows Bridging the Industry-Academic Divide

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Industry FellowsBridging the Industry-Academic Divide Josh Tenenberg Computing and Software Systems University of Washington, Tacoma SIGCSE 2010

  2. SIGCSE 2010

  3. The Industry Fellows Model SIGCSE 2010

  4. Outline • The Video • What does pairing a teacher and industry professional enable? • Impact on students • Design Principles SIGCSE 2010

  5. What is enabled? SIGCSE 2010

  6. Supervised Sandbox: Requirements interview with “client” SIGCSE 2010

  7. “When you talk with clients, you cannot design ... talking about the design of the system will lead you to not ask things you should.” “No one else will write the requirements.” “Document everything you talk about with [the client]” “What they say and what they want are two different things.” SIGCSE 2010

  8. Example Critique By Jake Knapp, an Interaction Designer at Google, commenting on a student design http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MywEsEizTg

  9. Impact on students

  10. SIGCSE 2010

  11. “Compared to other courses in the Institute of Technology at UW Tacoma, what difference did it make having the industry fellow as part of the teaching team?” • “How has interaction with the industry fellow affected the design and execution of your final project?” SIGCSE 2010

  12. Legitimization of the course “[The industry fellow's] presence helped us to think of our project as serious work rather than a practice exercise that simply simulated the real work.” • Connecting classroom to world “The industry fellow ... helped tie in some of the key concepts that we would need to learn and be conscious of for work outside of an academic setting.” • A higher standard of performance “The feedback he was able to give us on our milestones was well-grounded, and the fact that he didn't hold his punches made us more determined to work hard.” “I feel that since we were going to be presenting our project to an industry professional, we wanted to increase the quality of the project.” • Students value academic and practical knowledge “Having a representative from the industry provides a much needed alternate perspective. We have been able to get both the research and experimentation view alongside the practical hands on perspective.” SIGCSE 2010

  13. Design Principles • Working together on curriculum review, planning and enactment of a course related to the professional's expertise • Regular interaction between industry fellow, students, and teacher during academic term • Division of labor to exploit what each does best • Flexible to adapt to different contexts • Sustainable time commitment for both faculty member and industry fellow SIGCSE 2010

  14. Photo references • Google Kirkland office photo: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2008/05/05/2004393664.jpg • UW Tacoma photo: www.djc.com/special/construct99/10d.jpg • “Shop” photo: http://grcimagenet.grc.nasa.gov/grcdigitalimages/1998/1998_02798L.JPG SIGCSE 2010

  15. Thanks to … • The IF’s: Adam Barker, Jake Knapp, Beth Whitezel • Students in TCSS 452, winter 2009 and 2010 and students in TCSS 360 winter 2010 • Orlando Baiocchi, Director of the Institute of Tech@UWT • UWT Institute of Technology Advisory Board • UWT Chancellor’s Fund: for replication and external eval SIGCSE 2010

  16. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. SIGCSE 2010

  17. Professional practitioners moonlighting as part-time teachers • Assumes the transmission model: domain knowledge is all that matters • Discounts educator expertise: pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, local knowledge, ... SIGCSE 2010

  18. Guest speakers from industry • As above: the transmission model and discounting educator expertise • Most practice is tacit, so only a fraction can be verbalized in a talk • No feedback to students on theirwork • Decontextualized from the classroom: does not bridge the gap from university to industry • Little to no understanding of the pragmatics of specific higher education institutions SIGCSE 2010

  19. Team teaching • Discounts professional practitioner expertise • Socializes students into a community of academics SIGCSE 2010

  20. Student coops/internships • Assumes the socio-cultural model • Difficult to instantiate at a number of institutions • Experience varies considerably from one student to next • Few opportunities to integrateacademic knowledge, including reflection on experience SIGCSE 2010

  21. Industry advisory boards • Industry input is at the wrong “level”: • On programs as wholes, not individual courses • No feedback to students on theirwork • Decontextualized from the classroom: does not bridge the gap from university to industry SIGCSE 2010

  22. In a recent large-school study of engineering programs sponsored by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, the authors propose that professional practice shoud be at the center of engineering curricula. “[I]f students are to be prepared to enter new-century engineering, the center of engineering education should be professional practice, integrating technical knowledge and skills of practice. ... “faculty need to make clear what expert practice looks like, modeling or otherwise making visible both thinking and doing.” Both the National Research Council, in their report How People Learn and the Carnegie Foundation's Preparation for the Professions Program “stress the need for ... teachers to workwith practicing professionals as they create robust strategies for teaching and learning in the various professional disciplines“ [8], with similar sentiments echoed by the National Academy of Engineering. SIGCSE 2010

  23. Design Brainstorm SIGCSE 2010

  24. SIGCSE 2010

  25. SIGCSE 2010

  26. Why is Industry Fellows novel? compared to ... • Student coops/internships • Guest speakers from industry • Professional practitioners moonlighting as part-time teachers • Industry advisory boards SIGCSE 2010

  27. Student coops/internships • Guest speakers from industry • Professional practitioners moonlighting as part-time teachers • Industry advisory boards SIGCSE 2010

  28. Folk pegagogy, not learning research “[In this model] what is important about education is the corpus of facts that has been collected about a particular subject. ... For learning to occur, knowledge has to enter learners’ minds, which requires that it be transmitted from the outside world (e.g. from a teacher or book). ...” Bruce Torff, “Tacit Knowledge in Teaching” in Sternberg and Horvath (eds.) Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999. SIGCSE 2010

  29. Learning research, not folk pedagogy “ ‘to learn’ means to participate more successfully in the collective practices that define particular ways of knowing as recognized by various communities.” Hickey and Anderson, “Situative approaches to student assessment”, 2007 “the mastery of knowledge and skill requires newcomers to move toward full participation in the sociocultural practices of a community.” Lave and Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, 1991 SIGCSE 2010

  30. SIGCSE 2010

  31. What are the philosophical assumptions built into Industry Fellows? Replaces a transmission model of learning with a sociocultural model. SIGCSE 2010

  32. The Transmissionmodel of learning SIGCSE 2010

  33. The socioculturalmodel of learning SIGCSE 2010

  34. Different social and material worlds SIGCSE 2010

  35. Practitioners and higher-ed faculty inhabit different worlds SIGCSE 2010

  36. The Industry Fellows program bridges the gap SIGCSE 2010

More Related