Long term care policy summit
Download
1 / 30

Long-Term Care Policy Summit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 109 Views
  • Uploaded on

Long-Term Care Policy Summit. Suzanne Crisp Director of Program Design & Implementation Boston College. Today’s Discussion. Balancing Incentive Program Community First Choice Option. Balancing Incentive Program. Purpose – Encourage States to rebalance budgets

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Long-Term Care Policy Summit' - nolan-bullock


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Long term care policy summit

Long-Term Care Policy Summit

Suzanne Crisp

Director of Program Design & Implementation

Boston College


Today s discussion
Today’s Discussion

  • Balancing Incentive Program

  • Community First Choice Option


Balancing incentive program
Balancing Incentive Program

  • Purpose – Encourage States to rebalance budgets

  • Shift Medicaid dollars from institutions to the community

  • Enhanced FMAP to increase diversions and access to HCBS

  • 5% if less than 25% LTSS spending in non-institutional settings

  • 2% if less than 50% LTSS spending in non-institutional settings

  • Enhancement ends after two years


Requirements
Requirements

  • Aging and Disability Resource Centers (ADRC) Single point entry or no wrong door -

  • Uniform assessments process

  • Eliminate conflict of interest


Conflict free case management
Conflict Free Case Management

  • Desire of CMS for years

  • Eliminate:

    • Incentives for over or under utilization

    • Retain as clients through failure to promote independence

    • Focus on agent or provider convenience rather than person-centered practices

  • Independent agent should not be influenced by variations in local or State funding

  • Service plan based on needs-based criteria


Conflict free case management1
Conflict Free Case Management

  • Independent assessments and service plan development may not be performed by a provider that will then provide services

  • Payment to the provider of services for evaluation and assessment cannot be based on the cost of the resulting plan of care

  • In rare instances, service providers may evaluate and assess but firewalls must be present


Section 1915 k community first option
Section 1915(k) Community First Option

  • Section 6078 of the Affordable Care Act 2010

  • Provides vehicle to use consumer control to provide personal assistance services

  • Consumer control

    • Individual exercises as much control as desired to select, train, supervise, schedule, determine duties, and dismiss the attendant care provider


Community first choice option
Community First Choice Option

  • Attendant services & supports to assist in accomplishing activities of daily living (ADLs), instrument ADLs, and health-related tasks through hands-on assistance, supervision, or curing

  • Back-up System must be in place

  • Transitions costs required

  • Allows for the provision of services that increase independence or substitute for human assistance to the extent that expenditures would have been made for human assistance


1915 k recognizes three models
1915(k) Recognizes Three Models

  • Agency-provider model

    • Entity contracts to provide services directly through employees or arranges for the services under the direction of the individual

    • Agency acts as the employer of record

    • Individual must have significant and meaningful role in management of services

  • Self-directed model with service budget

    • FMS must be available

    • Reimbursed at service or administrative FMAP rate

    • Cash or vouchers permitted

    • Participant is employer of record

  • Other service delivery model

    • States may propose other models


Support services required
Support Services Required

  • Operate with person-centeredness

  • Provide support system

    • Assesses and counsels

    • Provides information

    • Includes information on risks and responsibilities including tools

    • Develops a backup plan

    • Assessors are free from conflict

    • Data collection


Section 1915 k
Section 1915(k)

  • May offer goods and services

  • Home modification excluded unless tied to increased independence or sub for human asst.

  • Targeting not permitted

  • Must offer statewide

  • Current activity – CA, MN, AK, NY, AZ

  • Differences between the (j) and (k)

    • Enhanced funding (k)

    • Level of Care (k)


Section 1915 k continued
Section 1915(k) Continued

  • Allows a cash benefit

  • Prospective payments allowed

  • Target population must meet level of care

  • FMS reimbursed at service or admin rate

  • Requires creation of a Development and Implementation Council

  • Enhanced FMAP at 6%

  • Requires a face-to-face assessment (telemedicine) annually

  • Person-centered planning required


The possibilities
The Possibilities

  • Include all participant directed program under one authority that offers enhanced match

  • Replace State Plan Personal Care and Waiver Attendant Care with Community First Choice and receive Enhanced Match (6%)

  • Section 1915(i) Targets those not meeting LoC

  • Use FMS Support Structure to Manage all PD


Challenges of community first choice
Challenges of Community First Choice

  • Create sufficient supports to ensure program integrity

  • Case Management, care coordination and self-directed counseling –YIKES!

  • Establish and maintain a comprehensive continuous quality assurance system

  • Collect and report information for Federal oversight and the completion of a Federal evaluation

  • Serves a LoC population only


Challenges of community first choice option
Challenges of Community First Choice Option

  • Must receive one waiver service to maintain financial eligibility

  • Consumer Control – how broad, how narrow

  • Coordinating assessment and service planning with other authorities

  • Who has final say in care coordination?

    • Waiver case manager

    • Targeted case management

    • Health Home coordinator



Majority of states have 1000 5000 self direction ltss participants
Majority of States have 1000 – 5000 Self-Direction LTSS Participants

AK

WA

ME

MT

ND

VT

MN

OR

NH

NY

WI

MA

ID

SD

MI

RI

WY

CT

PA

Hawaii

IA

NE

NJ

IN

OH

NV

UT

IL

DE

WV

VA

CO

CA

KS

MD

MO

KY

DC

NC

TN

OK

AR

SC

AZ

NM

GA

AL

MS

LA

TX

FL

17


Traditional Services Participants

Participant-Directed Services


Positive impact of life
Positive Impact of Life Participants

Cash & Counseling participants were up to 90% more likely to be very satisfied with how they led their lives.


Assessed needs met
Assessed Needs Met Participants

Cash & Counseling significantly reduced participants’ unmet personal care needs.


Caregivers better satisfied
Caregivers Better Satisfied Participants

Primary caregivers were significantly more satisfied with their lives in general.


Virtually no fraud or abuse
Virtually No Fraud or Abuse Participants

Cash & Counseling did not result in the increased misuse of Medicaid funds or abuse of participants


Essential elements of participant direction
Essential Elements of Participant Direction Participants

  • Person-Centered Practices

  • Individual budget

  • Information, Assistance and Supports

  • Financial Management Services


Commonly used terms
Commonly Used Terms Participants

Participant-Directed Counselor: Individual who works with the participant in designing their plan. The person the participant goes to with questions.

McInnis-Dittrich, Simone, and Mahoney (April, 2006)


Understand federal employment obligations
Understand Federal Employment Obligations Participants

  • Internal Revenue Services – uniform across states

  • Payroll for participant-directed services is different

  • Separate Employer Identification Number required?

  • Are guidelines clear for completing forms, filing, withholding, and depositing

  • If reconciliation is necessary – can you perform this?

  • A few forms: IRS Forms – 940, 941, 2678, W-3, W-4, 1099, 1096

  • When are numbers retired?

  • How do you calculate Federal unemployment taxes? When do you deposit?

  • How do you manage overpayments of SSA and Medicare Taxes


Common findings self direction rebalances service dollars
Common Findings – Self Direction Rebalances Service Dollars

  • Acute care and high costs services are lower for those self-directing, however, basic service costs increase

  • Per capita Medicaid costs are less for self-directed participants than traditionally served participants

  • Costs per hour are lower for those using self-direction than for agency services

  • If the cost of counseling and FMS are considered in the design of the program, these are at least neutral


Tangible costs considerations
Tangible Costs Considerations Dollars

  • Hiring family members – reduce unemployment or public assistance

  • Income tax implications

  • Service costs – Participants receive services

  • Case management – add on – PD in addition to CM tasks

  • Financial Management Services

  • Admin staff to run a PD program – cost vs efficiency


Intangible considerations
Intangible Considerations Dollars

  • Satisfaction/Safety with PD

  • QOL impacts health – health impacts $

  • Responsibility and authority can lead to good stewardship

  • Caregiver satisfaction



ad