1 / 8

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ TGn to WG15 Liaison Report ] Date Submitted: [ 16 September 2004 ] Source: [ James D. Allen ] Company [ Appairent Technologies ]

noel-galloway
Download Presentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TGn to WG15 Liaison Report] Date Submitted: [16 September 2004] Source: [James D. Allen] Company [Appairent Technologies] Address [Add address Street, City, PC, Province/State, Country] Voice:[Add telephone number], FAX: [Add FAX number], E-Mail:[Add e-mail address] Re: [Excerpted from TGn Chair’s closing report, document 11-04-1xxx-00-000n] Abstract: [Summary of September 2004 Berlin meeting status] Purpose: [Inform the WG] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies

  2. These notes courtesy of Bruce Kraemer, Chair TGn with my editorial comments Partially From Document 11-04-1030-02-000n James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies

  3. September Summary Good news • 32 presentations completed • Because the presentations did not fill every available meeting minute there was adequate time to caucus and, at least tentatively, explore possible mergers which would result in new completes or revised completes. Bad News • Complete presentations did not have adequate time to present or answer audience questions. • Not enough time to conduct panel discussion or additional selection steps. • Not known how many completes will exist in November James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies

  4. James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies

  5. November Agenda Challenge • Panel Discussion • Possible inclusion of one or more additional complete proposal • Extended presentation and Q&A time for completes • Additional technical presentations anticipated • Need to refresh audience memory James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies

  6. You Are here Selection Process 665r9 Mergers may A take place. Step 11 The TG may Step 11 Mergers may decide time The remaining Step 13 take place. required for proposals may Initial 60 Minutes The TG may consideration of Step 7 undergo technical presentation for all decide time new mergers changes without proposals. required for Step 8 requiring a Panel discussion. consideration of merge. new mergers Step 16 Step 9 Elimination vote. Eliminate proposal Recess to allow with least support. merger granted at Any new Y option of TG. mergers? Presentation of merged proposals. Y N Presentation of all Any Mergers Y remaining take place? proposals Discard un- Step 10 merged partial proposals. N Step 13 The remaining proposals may Panel Discussion undergo technical More than 1 Final 5 minute Y at option of the changes without proposal left? statement. Step 12 chair requiring a 25% low-bar merge. Elimination vote N Step 60 minute Step 15 17 presentation of Statements from More than 1 Roll-call Step 14 remaining N no voters of why proposal left? confirmation vote proposals they voted no. including Q & A N Step 20 Step 19 Editor prepares Draft 1.0. Vote that Adopt proposal as Response by it is technically initial technical Y 75% for ? proposers. consistent with specification technical spec. N Y 75% for ? Roll-call 75% for ? confirmation vote Y Step 11 Step 18 Forward Draft 1.0 Mergers may Bring back last to WG for Letter Step 21 N take place. three proposals Ballot The TG may decide time Step 13 The remaining required for proposals may consideration of Drawing by Adrian Stephens undergo technical new mergers Procedure End September 16, 2003 changes without requiring a merge. James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies

  7. Selection Process 665r9 A Mergers may take place. The TG may decide time required for consideration of new mergers. Initial 60 minutes presentation for all proposals. Panel discussion. Step 11 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Any new mergers? Recess to allow merger granted at option of TG. Presentation of merged proposals. By Nov 4th Y N Discard unmerged partial proposals. Note this Step 10 Step 13 Final 5 minute statement. 25% low-bar Elimination vote. The remaining proposals may undergo technical changes without requiring a merge. Step 12 60 minute presentation of remaining proposals.. James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies

  8. My Comments: Interesting points: • Well run • Partial proposals are ~ irrelevant – 2 ½ camps • 802.15.3 was presented by Allen as an independent proposal • Many techniques included data aggregation • Many techniques included increasing band to 40 MHz. • Working with .11, .15 and .19 leadership to make sure .15 has some say as to how channels are bonded and how coexistence is optimized – more later. • Heard that up to 680 Mbps was proposed James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies

More Related