Decision support systems for forest biodiversity
Download
1 / 43

Decision Support Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 282 Views
  • Updated On :

Decision Support Systems for Forest Biodiversity Evaluation of Current Systems and Future Needs K. Norman Johnson Sean Gordon Oregon State University Project Questions What types of decision support systems exist for use in sustainable forestry and biodiversity management?

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Decision Support Systems ' - niveditha


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Decision support systems for forest biodiversity l.jpg

Decision Support Systems for Forest Biodiversity

Evaluation of Current Systems and Future Needs

K. Norman Johnson

Sean Gordon

Oregon State University


Project questions l.jpg
Project Questions

  • What types of decision support systems exist for use in sustainable forestry and biodiversity management?

  • How they are being applied?

  • How can existing tools could be adapted and applied elsewhere?

  • What additional tools (or capabilities) are required to meet forest management needs?


What are decision support systems l.jpg
What are Decision Support Systems?

  • “… situations where human judgment is important but where limitations in human information processing impede decision making.”

  • “…bring together the intellectual flexibility and imagination of humans with the speed, accuracy, and tirelessness of the computer.”

  • Our definition – DSS help:

    • evaluate alternative decision options (decision)

    • deal with complexity (support)

    • have a clear, reproducible protocol (system)


What is biodiversity l.jpg
What is Biodiversity?

  • …variety and variability among living organisms and the ecological complexes in which they occur…number of different items and their relative frequency (OTA 1987)

  • "Biodiversity is the totality of genes, species, and ecosystems in a region” (UNEP 1992)

  • Montreal Protocol Criterion 1

    • ecosystems (1-5 coarse filter), species & genetic (6-9 fine filter)

  • composition, structure, and function (Franklin)


Approach l.jpg
Approach

  • “Top down” identification of priority needs for forest biodiversity decisions

    • review of literature and interviews with experts & decision makers

  • “Bottom-up” inventory of available systems

    • previous surveys, literature, interview system designers

  • Comparison

    • to what extent are existing DSS able to assist with priority needs?

  • Suggestions for improvement


Literature review decision needs l.jpg
Literature Review : Decision Needs

Smythe, K.D.; Bernabo, J.C.; Carter, T.B.; Jutro, P.R. 1996. Focusing Biodiversity Research on the Needs of Decision Makers. Environmental Management 20(6): 865-872.

  • 100+ decision makers: government, environmental, industry

  • 5 types of decision areas

    • protection/ conservation, management, organizational authority and responsibility, siting, and laws and regulations.

  • 4 levels of decision making

    • operational, tactical, strategic, policy

  • 4 categories of info needed

    • (l) significance of biodiversity, (2) status and trends of biodiversity, (3) management for biodiversity, and (4) linkage of social and biological objectives.


Interviews with forestry and conservation leaders l.jpg
Interviews with Forestry and Conservation Leaders

  • Tony Melchoirs, Weyerhaeuser

  • Rick Brown, Defenders of Wildlife

  • Dennis Grossman, Nature Serve

  • Jerry Franklin, Univ. of Washington

  • Sally Duncan, Consultant

  • Carlton Owen, Consultant

  • Barry Noon, Colorado State Univ.


Problems in assessing biodiversity from literature and interviews l.jpg
Problems in Assessing Biodiversity from Literature and Interviews

  • Need for credible measures & tools for assessing biodiversity

  • Need for standardization in ways to characterize and assess biodiversity across a region (currently many different ways)


Major forest biodiversity influences from interviews and literature l.jpg
Major Forest Biodiversity Influences From Interviews and Literature

  • Development

  • Climate change

  • Invasive species

  • Uncharacteristic disturbance

  • Timber harvest


Typical decisions that involve biodiversity evaluations from interviews and literature l.jpg
Typical Decisions that Involve Biodiversity Evaluations Literaturefrom Interviews and Literature

  • Recovery Plans, HCPs, and Safe Harbor Agreements

  • Conservation easements

  • Certification

  • Adoption of state forest practice laws

  • Federal and state plans

  • Private forest plans

  • Development choices

  • Restoration opportunities

  • Land exchanges


Important framing issues for decisions from interviews and literature l.jpg
Important “Framing Issues” for Decisions Literaturefrom Interviews and Literature

  • Consideration of the entire relevant landscape, such as whole watersheds for riparian issues

  • Consideration of short-term and long-term risk, especially relative to the relative risks of action and inaction


Important institutional issues from interviews and literature l.jpg
Important “Institutional Issues” Literaturefrom Interviews and Literature

  • Commitment to assess and organize information on biodiversity, set trigger points, identify cause-effect relationships

  • Trust among agencies responsible for biodiversity protection

  • Acceptance of, and ownership in, landscape-level (cross-ownership) evaluation tools

  • Existence of landscape-level institutions


Literature review dss l.jpg
Literature Review : DSS Literature

Mowrer, H.T. et al. 1997. Decision support systems for ecosystem management: an evaluation of existing systems. General Technical Report RM-GTR-296.

Rauscher, H.M. 1999. Ecosystem management decision support for federal forests in the United States: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 114: 173-197.

Johnson, P.; Lachman, B. 2001. Rapid scan of decision support system tools for land-use related decision making. Unpublished draft. Arlington, VA : NatureServe.


Some conclusions from dss literature review l.jpg
Some Conclusions Literaturefrom DSS Literature Review

  • Successful tool kits address the process of decision-making (social negotiation), rather than just putting information in front of decision-makers

  • Consideration of T&E species a common thread in decisions at different levels

  • At county level, rarely deal with individual species unless legally required

  • Federal forest planning focused on individual species, but tools lacking


Inventory of systems 86 systems in current inventory l.jpg
Inventory of Systems Literature86 systems in current inventory


Prioritization of systems 24 systems currently ranked priority 1 2 l.jpg
Prioritization of Systems Literature24 systems currently ranked priority 1-2


System description template l.jpg
System Description Template Literature

  • purpose, core outputs, major components

    • simulation, evaluation, optimization

  • capabilities for evaluating biodiversity concerns

    • coarse vs. fine filter approaches

  • examples of use

    • brief description + contact info

  • transferability

    • development status, cost, technical resources required

  • future development plans


System description ned l.jpg
System Description : NED Literature

Purpose

  • help managers develop goals, assess current and future conditions, and produce management plans for forests in the eastern United States

    Core Outputs

  • evaluation of goals, for any or all of five resources: visual quality, wildlife, water, wood production, and health


System example ned l.jpg
System Example : NED Literature

management options

forest growth model

(simulation)

stand conditions

habitat suitability indices (evaluation – fine filter)non-spatial

other factors:visual quality, water, wood production, and general ecological objectives

management goals

(evaluation)


System description ned20 l.jpg
System Description : NED Literature

Major Components

  • NED/SIPS: stand inventory analysis, treatments, 4 integrated growth models

  • NEWILD: evaluates the habitat suitability of stand inventory

  • NED-Health: estimates effects of numerous insects and diseases, along with detrimental aspects of adverse weather, logging damage, animal grazing, and air pollution.

  • NED-1: evaluates how a management unit as a whole, or an individual stand, may provide conditions required for specific goals (aesthetics, ecology, forest health, timber, water and wildlife)


System description ned21 l.jpg
System Description : NED Literature

Capabilities for evaluating biodiversity concerns

  • Includes Habitat Suitability Indices for 338 New England vertebrate species

  • Fine filter approach

  • Analyst’s choice of which to include

  • Analyze existing or work towards desired habitat

  • Non-spatial

  • Species richness but not abundance or interaction

  • Coarse filter interaction between invasives/pathogens and biodiversity


System description ned22 l.jpg
System Description : NED Literature

Examples of use

1. Numerous (in hundreds) East Coast federal, state and private foresters use NED to prepare forest stewardship plans.

2. Mike Rauscher of the Forest Service (828-667-5261) has adapted and used it on private lands in South Carolina.

3. It is being used on Ft. Campbell's 70,000 acres (contact: Steve Forry 270-956-3376).

4. Maryland DNR is working to adapt and use NED to analyze different properties in terms of water quality, wildlife, recreation and biodiversity (contact: Rob Northrop 410-287-2918).


System description ned23 l.jpg
System Description : NED Literature

Transferability

(development status, cost, technical resources required)

  • “Production” system prepared for use by others

  • Growth models operate with species and diameter

  • Wildlife, health, aesthetics require understory conditions and additional data beyond traditional, timber-oriented, forestry stand exams.


Slide24 l.jpg

Ability of NED to address LiteratureMontreal Process Criterion 1 indicators


Other evaluation criteria l.jpg

Indicators Literature

338 species

Timeframe

User determined

Measure

Habitat Suitability Index

Reference

optimum habitat conditions

Sus. Check

none

Projection

management & forest growth simulators

Monitoring

Other Evaluation Criteria?

7 Elements of sustainability (Davis, et. al. 2001)


System example emds l.jpg
System example: EMDS Literature

Ecosystem Management Decision Support is primarily designed to help users conduct ecological assessments. It provides a framework for users to integrate spatial information (using ArcGIS) with models of how to evaluate this information (using the Netweaver knowledge-base builder).


Emds knowledge bases l.jpg
EMDS: Knowledge bases Literature

  • A form of meta database

    • A formal logical representation of how to evaluate information

    • Networks of interrelated topics

    • Mental map

  • Advantages

    • Interactive, graphic design (modularity)

    • Numerous & diverse topics can be analyzed within a single integrated analysis


Slide28 l.jpg

EMDS Literature

Applied to the Montreal C& I.


Willamette basin alternative futures analysis l.jpg
Willamette Basin Alternative LiteratureFutures Analysis

  • Purpose: Help diverse stakeholders understand the ecological consequences of possible societal decisions related to changes in human populations and ecosystems in the Pacific Northwest. Simulates the effects of 3 possible development scenarios on regional measures of biodiversity over the next 50 years.


Interim conclusions on system capabilities l.jpg
Interim Conclusions on LiteratureSystem Capabilities

  • Diversity of approaches, but relatively few fully developed and accepted DSS for forest biodiversity

  • Many systems link a variety of independent components

  • Traditional systems (e.g. NED) fit well within our description template, but many do not

    • generic systems like EMDS

    • prototypical systems like Willamette Futures

  • Often difficult to evaluate transferability


Dss for commercial timber supplies and forest biodiversity a comparison l.jpg
DSS for Commercial Timber Supplies and Forest Biodiversity—A Comparison

The 1970s—the golden age of DSS for commercial timber supplies. For this work, we had:

  • A widely-accepted, integrated mathematical theory of the decision problem

  • Agreement on a limited number of forest types of interest

  • Existence of quantitative models of growth and yield for most major forest types

  • General agreement among landowners/agencies about how to formulate the problem


Dss for commercial timber supplies and forest biodiversity a comparison38 l.jpg
DSS for Commercial Timber Supplies and Forest Biodiversity—A Comparison

Is now the golden age for forest biodiversity DSS?

  • A widely-accepted, integrated mathematical theory of the decision problem? NO

  • Agreement on the major species of interest? NO

  • Published models of how species of interest react to changes in forest conditions? NO

  • General agreement among landowners/agencies about how to formulate the problem? NO


Dss for commercial timber supplies and forest biodiversity a comparison39 l.jpg
DSS for Commercial Timber Supplies and Forest Biodiversity—A Comparison

  • DSS for forest biodiversity often must develop all this information on the fly—theoretical model, species of interest, relation of species to habitat, agreement among affected parties

  • It should not be surprising that relatively few DSS exist for forest biodiversity or that they are often so difficult and expensive to create.


Interim conclusions comparison of major issues to dss capabilities l.jpg
Interim Conclusions Biodiversity—A ComparisonComparison of Major Issues to DSS Capabilities

  • Most focus on timber harvest as the central issue

  • Some now allow consideration of the hazard of fuel build-up

  • Very few deal with pests, pathogens, climate change, or development (esp. effects on biodiversity)


What is a dss l.jpg
What is a DSS? Biodiversity—A Comparison

  • Many important decisions include biodiversity evaluations not covered by the traditional computer-based definition

    • forest certification standards

    • Expert committee approaches (e.g. FEMAT) used in bioregional assessment and planning


Communication of results l.jpg
Communication of Results Biodiversity—A Comparison

  • Report & presentation for NCSSF

  • Electronic distribution of report

  • Web-linked database of DSS (searchable by items in our template)

  • Publication in forestry and conservation journals


Questions for ncssf group l.jpg
Questions for NCSSF Group Biodiversity—A Comparison

  • What uses might you have for decision support systems (DSS) to assist you with decisions that affect forest biodiversity?

  • If you haven’t used them much for this purpose, why not?

    3. What would you need to know to help you select appropriate tools?

    a. What attributes of systems are likely to make them most useful?

    b. What aspects of DSS cause you to have reservations about their use?

    4. How would biodiversity implications from these systems need to be expressed to make them comparable to other major factors that typically influence your decisions?


ad