HCQIA
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 28

Presented by:Kimberly Daniel,JD 2011 NAMSS Convention Summarized by : Lillian E. Zamora, MAEd PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 110 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

HCQIA Inmunity Lessons learned:An Analysis of Recent Cases Where Hospitals and Individuals Lost Their Bid for HCQIA Immunity. Presented by:Kimberly Daniel,JD 2011 NAMSS Convention Summarized by : Lillian E. Zamora, MAEd. The Act.

Download Presentation

Presented by:Kimberly Daniel,JD 2011 NAMSS Convention Summarized by : Lillian E. Zamora, MAEd

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

HCQIA InmunityLessonslearned:AnAnalysis of Recent Cases WhereHospitals and IndividualsLostTheirBidfor HCQIA Immunity

Presentedby:KimberlyDaniel,JD

2011 NAMSS Convention

Summarized by: Lillian E. Zamora, MAEd


The act

TheAct

TheHealthcareQualityImprovementact of 1986(“HCQIA”) providesinmunityfrom civil moneydamagestohospitlas, clinics, physicians and othersparticipating in “professionalreviewactions” so long as certainrequirements are met. Theserequirements are sometimesreferredto as the “fairnessstandardsorelements of

42 U.S.C.∲111129(a)”.


The act1

TheAct

HCQIA immunityisnotfromsuititobviouslyisveryimportant . If HCQIA immunityisavailable , theonlyremedythatmaybeawardedto a succesfulplantiffisaninjunction.


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

Thispresentationwillprovideguidanceonhowhealthcareorganizationsmaybestestablish and retain HCQIA immunitybasedonlesonslearnedfromrecent HCQIA cases


Learning objectives

LearningObjectives

1.Overview of HCQIA

A. Purpose of theact

B. Summary of theact

C. Beneficiaries of theact

2.Lessonslearnedfrom cases WhereImmunityWasLost

3.Crucial FactorstoEnsureEstablishment and Retention of Immunity

4.Questions


Purpose of hcqia

Purpose of HCQIA

One of thegoals of theUnitedStatesCongress in enacting HCQIA wastodevelop a repositorythatcontainedthenames of physiciansagainstwhomprofessionalsreviewactionsweretaken, malpracticejudgementsentered,andsettlementsreached.

42U.S.CS.∲11101et.seg.

Notalltypes of healthcareprovidersmustbereported.


Purpose of hcqia1

Purpose of HCQIA

Thetrade off forstablishingthisdatabase, TheNationalPractitionerDatabank (“NPDB”), istheimmunityforparticipants in prfessional peer reviewactions. HCQIA immunityisintendedtopromoteparticipation, candor, and objectivity in thecriticalevaluation of medicalprofessionalsbymedicalprofessionalswhichisnecessaryfortheefficacy of thereviewprocess.


Summary of hcqia

Summary of HCQIA

Under HCQIA, healthcareentities and coveredindividualsmayqualifyforimmnunityfrom civil monetarydamagesforcertainactionsifthereprotinformationtothe NPDB following a professionalreviewactionthatadverselyaffectsthclinicalprivileges of a physicianfor a periodlongerthan 30 days.

42U.S.C.∲11133(1)(A)


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

Summary of HCQIA

.

HCQIA immunityappliesif a professionalreviewactionistaken:

In thereasoablebeliefthtatheactionwas in thefurtherance of qualityhealthcare.

After a reasonableefforttoobtainthefacts of thematter.

Afteradequatenotice and hearingprocedures are affordedtothephysicianinvolvedoraftersuchotherprocedure as are fairtothephysicianunderthecircumstances, and

In thereasonablebeliefthtattheactionwaswarrantedby te factsknownaftersuchreasonableefforttoobtainfactsaftermeetingtherequirements of paragraph (3)

42U.S.CS.∲11112(a)


Adequate notice and hearing procedures

AdequateNotice and HearingProcedures

Twotypes of noticemustbegiventoestablish HCQIA immunity:

1. Notice of proposedaction, and

2. Notice of hearing


Adequate notice and hearing procedures1

AdequateNotice and HearingProcedures

Notice of proposedactionmuststate;

1. That a professionalreviewaction has beenproposedtobetakenagainst a phsysician;

2. Thereasonsfortheproposedaction

3.The pyscian has thereghttorequest a hearing

4. Any time limitstorequest a hearing (notlessthan 30 days);and

5. A summary of thephysican’sharingrigthsthatcomplywith HCQIA.

42U.S.C.∲11112(b)(2)


Adequate notice and hearing procedures2

AdequateNotice and HearingProcedures

Ifthephysicantimelyrequests a haring, he mustbegiven a noticestating:

1.The place, time and date of thehearing , whichisnotlessthan 30 daysafterthedte of thenotice; and

2. thelist of whitnesses(ifany) expectedtotestifyonbehalf of theprofessionalreviewbody.

42U.S.C.∲11112(b)(2)


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

AdequateNotice and HearingProcedures

Thephysicanmusthavethefollowinghearingrights:

Hearingbefore and adjudication panel;

Hearingofficcermaynotbeaneconomiccompetitor of physican;

Panel participannstsmaynotbeaconmiccopetitors of physican;

Representationbyattorney;

Record of procedings;


Cont adequate notice and hearing procedures

cont. AdequateNotice and HearingProcedures

6. Call, examine, crosswitness;

7.Present evidence;

8.Provide a writtenstatement at theconclusion of theprocedings;

9. Righttoreceive a writtendecsion of the panel, includingstatements of thereasonsforitsrecommendations;and

10.Righttoreceivewrittendecision of thehealthcareentity, incluidngthebasisforthedecision.

42U.S.C.∲11112(c)(2)


Summary of hcqia1

Summary of HCQIA

EmergencySituations

A healthcareentitymaytake a profewssionalreviewactionwhichresults in animmediatesuspensionorrestriction of a physician’sclinicalprivilegeswithout prior niticeorhearingwherefailuretoactmayresultimminentnotice and hearingorotheradequateprocedures.

42U.S.C.∲11112(c)(2)


Summary of hcqia2

Summary of HCQIA

Coveredhealthcareentitiesstartwithbenefit of thedoubt

HCQIA expressly presumes thatall of itsrequirementsforimmunityweremet prior tothereviewactionbeingtaken.. Thispresumptionhowever, mayberebuttedby a preponderance of theevidence.

Great deferenceisaffordedthereviewactionanddecisionmade so long as there are soomefactstosupportit AND theactiontakenfollowedthe HCQIA statutorycriteria in sequence.

42U.S.C.∲11112(2)(a)


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

  • In otherwords, courtsgenerallywillnotsustitutetheirjudgementforthose of theparticipatingentity and individuals.

  • Participantsmaynotsupply false information, but…. “Thegoodorbadfaith of thereviewersisirrelevant.

  • Broder vs. Allegany


Summary of hcqia3

Summary of HCQIA

HCQIA doesnotrequirethat a professionalreviewactionresult in an actual improvement in thequality of healthcarenordoesitrequirethattheconclusionsreachedbythereviewersbecorrect …justthatthereviewactionbereasonable.

Pullner


Summary of hcqia4

Summary of HCQIA

In determiningwether HCQIA immunityisavailableto a defendant, thecourtswillmakeanobjectivereview as towhetherthefour (4) requirementsweremet. HCQIA immunitywillbegrantedonlywhenit can beshownthattheactiontakenwas;

√In thefurtherance of qualityhealthcare

√Followed a fact-findinginvestigation of somekind.

√Followedproceduralrights of notice and a hearing (ortheequivlaentthreof);and

√ waswarrantedbasedonthefactsobtainedbefore and afterthehearing.


Beneficiaries of the act

BENEFICIARIES OF THE ACT

Whobenefitfrom HCQIA immunity?

▶Hospitals

▶Hospital Administrators

▶Physicians

▶Nurses

▶Anymember of a professionalreviewbody

▶ Thepublic


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

With legal protectionhowis HCQIA immunityeverlost?. Ifanyone of the4requirementsisabsent;

1.An actionnottaken in furtherance of quality of healthcare;

2. Actionthatdidnotfollow a factual investigation;

3. And actionthatfailedtoprovidetheaffectedphysicantheproceduralrights; or

4. Anactionthatwasnotwarrantedbaseduponthe factual information.

HCQIA immunityalsomustbeexpresslyclaimed


Recent cases in which hcqia immunity was lost

RECENT CASES IN WHICH HCQIA IMMUNITY WAS LOST


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

Most of the cases thatfollowfailedtosatisfy more thanone HCQIA requirement. Allweredecidedon a failuretomeetthemostobjective HCQIA requirement: absence of notice and oportunityforhearing (dueprocessgrounds)Thebigtakeway: Ensurepropernotice and hearingproceduresfollowed. Thisisthekeyto a succesful HCQIA immunitydefense.


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

Most of the cases thatfollowfailedtosatisfy more thanone HCQIA requirement. Allweredecidedon a failuretomeetthemostobjective HCQIA requirement: absence of notice and oportunityforhearing (dueprocessgrounds)

Thebigtakeway: Ensurepropernotice and hearingproceduresfollowed. Thisisthekeyto a succesful HCQIA immunitydefense.


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

ReviewActionWasNot in Furtherance of theQuality of HealthCare

In virtuallyevery dispute in whichthedefendantscalim HCQIA immunity, thereis a dispute as towethertheactionwasfurtherance of “ thequality of healthcare”.


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

ReviewActionWasNot in Furtherance of theQuality of HealthCare

Evenwhencourtsacknowledcgefactsthatsuggestother motives fortherevewaction, mostcourts do not base theirdecisionsabout HCQIA immunityontheabsence of thisrequirements.


Review action was not in furtherance of the quality of health care

ReviewActionWasNot in Furtherance of theQuality of HealthCare

  • Remember, thecourtsreviewunder HCQIA isanobjectivereview

  • A determinationthatreviewactionwasnottaken “ in furtherance of thequality of healthcare” wouldlikelyrequirecourtstomakesubjectivefindings-whichmost are willingto do.


Presented by kimberly daniel jd 2011 namss convention summarized by lillian e zamora maed

Seeenclosed PDF file:

Review Action Was Not in Furtherance of the Quality of Health Care

Related Cases


  • Login