1 / 27

Data From Tenopir & King

Data From Tenopir & King. 18,000+ scientists and social scientists 1977 to present University and non-university workplaces Mostly North America Recent studies of Astronomers, Medical faculty, faculty and students at several universities. Three Types of Data. Demographic.

nitesh
Download Presentation

Data From Tenopir & King

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data From Tenopir & King • 18,000+ scientists and social scientists • 1977 to present • University and non-university workplaces • Mostly North America • Recent studies of Astronomers, Medical faculty, faculty and students at several universities

  2. ThreeTypesofData • Demographic • Estimates of behavior • Details of “last” reading

  3. Articles: “can include those found in journal issues, Web sites, or separate copies such as preprints, reprints, and other electronic or paper copies.”

  4. Readings: “going beyond the table of contents, title, and abstract to the body of the article.”

  5. AverageArticlesRead per Scientist www.dlib.org/dlib/october03/king/10king.html Average number of articles read per scientist Year of Studies

  6. Scholarly Article Reading

  7. Average Annual Amount of Reading

  8. Average Annual Amount of Time (Hours) Spent Reading (Hrs)

  9. #3 #5 #4 #2 #6 #7 #1 Purpose and Ranking of Importance: University Medical

  10. Average Number of Personal Subscriptions to Scholarly Journals

  11. Personal Subscriptions • All studies average 2.2 • All UT science faculty average 3.8 • Medical faculty average 6.3

  12. Sources of Readings 21.4 % 36 % 42.9 % 49 % 35.7 % 15 % 15.6 % Universities Astronomers 22.1 % 62.3% Medical Faculty

  13. Print or Electronic 20 % 37 % 63 % 80 % 25 % Universities Astronomers 75 % Medical Faculty

  14. MeansofLearningAboutArticlesRead 29% 49% 22% 20.8% 16.9% 62.3% 21% 37% 39% Astronomers Universities Medical Faculty

  15. FormatofReading

  16. Astronomy Articles Read per Month vs. Productivity

  17. Awareness and Use of ADS by Productive PhD Astronomers

  18. Awareness and Use of ADS by not-Productive PhD Astronomers

  19. Average Time Spent Reading Per Article by Astronomers • U.S. astronomers (n=306) average 36 minutes • Non-U.S. astronomers (n=83) average 43 minutes

  20. Source of Reading by Astronomers

  21. Tenopir and King, Communication Patterns of Engineers, NY: IEEE/Wiley, 2004

  22. Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies www.clir.org/pub/reports/pub120/pub120.pdf

  23. Patterns of Journal Use by Faculty at Three Diverse Universities. October 2003 http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october03/king/10king.html

  24. Future Studies • Pediatricians • University faculty and students in Australia • University faculty and students in Finland • Scientists in Chile and Brazil • Tenopir & King surveys also being replicated in Cuba and Argentina

More Related