1 / 8

Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) IETF 77, Anaheim March 22, 2010

Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) IETF 77, Anaheim March 22, 2010. Hannes Tschofenig (short-timer) Marc Linsner Richard Barnes Roger Marshall. Note Well.

nita
Download Presentation

Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) IETF 77, Anaheim March 22, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit)IETF 77, AnaheimMarch 22, 2010 Hannes Tschofenig (short-timer) Marc Linsner Richard Barnes Roger Marshall

  2. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution”. Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: -the IETF plenary session, -any IETF working group or portion thereof, -the IESG or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG, -the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB, -any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices, -the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879). Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. Please consult RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 for details. A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public.

  3. Agenda Detailed agenda here: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/ecrit.txt 15 min. * Agenda Bashing and Status Update (Marc, Hannes, Roger) 10 min. * Introduction to IEEE ESSG (Emergency Service Study Group) Geoff Thompson - ESSG Co-chair 15 min * PSAP Callback (TBD for the ID, Stephen McCann with comments)Discuss potential feedback from emergency services groups on the requirements for this work. 10 min. * Unauthenticated emergency services (Dirk) Determine next steps. The group wants to work on it but there are still lots of open issues and re-chartering is required to add it to the milestone list. 10 min. * Transformations ID (James P.) TBD. 10 min. * ECRIT Direct (James W.) TBD.

  4. Agenda (con’t) 10 min. * Additional Data (Brian) Initial document version. Presentation of the history and the origin of the work. Determine interest. 10 min. * Data Only Emergency Calls (Brian) TBD. 10 min. * Completing the Request Location (Brian) Discussion whether the group should work on this document. The document is making a normative change to RFC 5222. 10 min. * Service URN Update and Service Classification (Henning) Intention: Documents are a bit stuck although group agreed to work on it. Henning will present a way forward. 10 min. * Emergency Text Messaging using SIP MESSAGE (Henning) Discussion about what the group should do in this area. 10 min. * Describing Boundaries for Civic (Martin) Intention: Discussion whether the group should work on this doc. 20 min. * Open Discussion

  5. Document Status • Best Current Practice for Communications Services in support of Emergency Calling • Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia •  --> Brian Rosen is collecting comments from IESG review and will update the draft accordingly. Any items of importance will be discussed on the mail list. • Location Hiding: Problem Statement and Requirements •  --> In IESG review, nothing exciting going on. • Specifying Holes in LoST Service Boundaries • In IESG review. Martin posted items to the mail list.

  6. Document Status (con’t) • Synchronizing Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol based Service Boundaries and Mapping Elements • The comments on the list by Alex got addressed and a new version was shipped. • IANA Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace for Local Emergency Communications • Been vetted on the list, author believes it’s ready, we have no milestone. • LoST Service List Boundary Extension • Using Imprecise Location for Emergency Context Resolution • The above drafts are done; we are only waiting for the feedback from the APPS directorate on the Relax NG schema.

  7. Ad-hoc Interim Meeting • 11th February, 2010, 8:00 AM EST • Topic: PSAP Callback • 2 hour phone conference call • Some explanation text on: • http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/trac/wiki

  8. Open Discussion (20 min) • Charter • Milestones

More Related