1 / 13

Using Explicit Semantic Representations for User Programming of Sensor Devices

Image: Burdekin Sensor Network, Pavan Sikka & Google. Using Explicit Semantic Representations for User Programming of Sensor Devices. Kerry Taylor and Patrick Penkala CSIRO ICT Centre Melbourne, 1 st December 2009. lots of pics of sensors. Context.

nissim-gallagher
Download Presentation

Using Explicit Semantic Representations for User Programming of Sensor Devices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Image: Burdekin Sensor Network, Pavan Sikka & Google Using Explicit Semantic Representations for User Programming of Sensor Devices Kerry Taylor and Patrick Penkala CSIRO ICT Centre Melbourne, 1st December 2009

  2. lots of pics of sensors Context CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  3. SSN-XG: Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group Commenced 1 March 2009. Two main objectives: (a) the development of ontologies for describing sensors, and (b) the extension of the Sensor Model Language (SML), one of the four SWE languages, to support semantic annotations. CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  4. Aim: To address real-time programming, tasking and querying sensors and sensor networks • Represent the semantics of the command language in an ontology • Use generic software tools, plus device-specific “transformer” and communication code modules • Assume a stateless model (declarative queries) • simplicity • amenability to optimisation • multi-user sharing (detect query subsumption, for example) CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  5. Case Study: an Automatic Weather Station • Environdata WeatherMaster1600 • sensors for: • air temperature, • relative humidity, • wind speed, • wind direction • + 3 simulated sensors: voltages of the battery and solar panel and the activity of the serial port. • proprietary command-line language of about 50 commands • request-response interaction style over a serial port. • Data is time-stamped and logged: for each of the four sensors at once. • 104 kilobytes memory, FIFO CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  6. Main Commands: STORAGE to measure data and log in memory “STORAGE 13 CURRENT 2 3 0 0 1 EHOUR 1 0” command 13 logs the current wind direction in memory 2 every hour. MEM to retrieve data from memory “MEM 4 SPECIFIC 2010 11 30 09 00 00 2010 12 01 09 00 00” requests logged data in MEM 4 for the given 24 hour period R for current values for all sensors “R” Environdata Command Language CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  7. 1. Model the Commands in an Ontology queryCurrentData queryPeriodData setStorageFunction CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  8. 2. Phrase queries using ontology terms in a device-independent query tool CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  9. 3. Classify query and instantiate CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  10. 4. Execute and see the results! CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  11. Benefits • Offers a device-independent route to sensor programming, but avoids standardising to lowest common model. • Validates queries by classification • Is self-documenting language through semantic context. • Can accommodate (some) evolution without coding. • Can also use the ontology modelling and DL reasoning to • Represent variation in query capability amongst similar devices • Allocate queries to devices that are sufficiently capable • Admit alternative “syntaxes” (or terminology) for same functions • Discover sensors by function, location, latency, frequency, accuracy, data format, custodian,... • Optimise wrt query subsumption (e.g. logging frequency) • Can extend to composition, substitution, spatial and temporal reasoning etc (see Compton et al in Proc Semantic Sensor Networks 2009) CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  12. Future Work Phenomics: Start with a particular observable trait or phenotype and work back to discover the causal gene. CSIRO. Australasian Ontology Workshop. Melbourne, 1 December 2009

  13. Contact Us Phone: 1300 363 400 or +61 3 9545 2176 Email: enquiries@csiro.au Web: www.csiro.au Thank you CSIRO ICT Centre Kerry Taylor Research Scientist Phone: 02 6216 7038 Email: Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au Web: www.ict.csiro.au SSN-XG: www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/

More Related