1 / 22

WRF/Chem Regional Modeling of the Mid-Atlantic: Comparison with Aura and Ground Based Measurements

WRF/Chem Regional Modeling of the Mid-Atlantic: Comparison with Aura and Ground Based Measurements. Elena Yegorova, Dale Allen , Christopher Loughner, and Russell Dickerson of the University of Maryland Kenneth Pickering of NASA-GSFC. Goals of today’s talk.

nili
Download Presentation

WRF/Chem Regional Modeling of the Mid-Atlantic: Comparison with Aura and Ground Based Measurements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WRF/Chem Regional Modeling of the Mid-Atlantic: Comparison with Aura and Ground Based Measurements Elena Yegorova, Dale Allen, Christopher Loughner, and Russell Dickerson of the University of Maryland Kenneth Pickering of NASA-GSFC

  2. Goals of today’s talk • Analyze an east coast of the United States air pollution event using surface observations (AIRNOW 8-hr maximum ozone amounts), satellite retrievals from OMI and TES, and output from a regional atmospheric chemistry model. • Obtain insight into the capabilities of OMI and TES to detect air pollution on the urban scale. • What event? • July 9-11, 2007 pollution event • What model? • On-line Weather Research and Forecasting model with integrated chemistry (WRF-Chem).

  3. Air quality on July 9, 2007 was Code Red (very bad) in the Mid-Atlantic. 8-hr max O3 of 131 ppbv within Baltimore NAA Baltimore, MD visibility during a clear day Baltimore, MD visibility At 6:45 PM July 9, 2007 Images obtained from the U.S. Air Quality Smog Blog (http://alg.umbc.edu/usaq).

  4. WRF/Chem Configuration • Domain: Eastern U.S. • 12 km hor res, 23 vertical layers • MOZART-4 chemical IC/BC • Meteorology driven by the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) model with grid nudging (FDDA). • Emissions: • Points sources from July 2007 CEMS data. • Area sources are projected 2009 emissions used in SIP modeling. Grown from 2002 U.S. inventory. • Emissions processed using SMOKE modeling system • M3DRY dry dep scheme implemented • No lightning NOx or stratospheric chemistry

  5. TES and OMI Products • TES: • Version 4 Level 2 Global Survey and Step & Stare Special Observations (Nadir) • OMI/MLS global, daily tropospheric column product: • OMI total column minus stratospheric column from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) (Lapse rate tropopause product of M.Schoeberl). • OMI Level-2 Ozone Profile Data, global, daily (Xiong Liu)

  6. Build-up to July 9, 2007 Air Pollution Episode: Comparison to ground stations • WRF/Chem simulation: 00 UT July 6, 2007 – 00 UT July 12, 2007 • Good agreement along the I-95 corridor. • High-bias present over the Appalachian Range (northern GA to se VA) • Note: After these simulations were made, a patch was added to M3DRY. This patch increases • deposition over water.

  7. WRF/Chem and Beltsville, MD Ozonesonde July 9,2007 18 UTC (1 pm EST)

  8. Vertical Extent of July 9, 2007 Air Pollution Episode

  9. TES OMI • TES and OMI have the greatest sensitivity in the 850 mb – 600 mb range • Capable of detecting pollution in the lower troposphere, but with greatly diminishing sensitivity below 800 mb

  10. TES and OMI Tropospheric Column Ozone – 20070709 18UTC • TES measured elevated Tropospheric Column Ozone (TCO) in the pollutant outflow region

  11. Origin of the Elevated Ozone Air Mass • HYSPLIT 72 hr back trajectories from TES profiles with high TCO values: starting at 2km (left), 4km (center), 7km (right) • At all levels air mass passed over the Great Lakes and Ohio River Valley within the previous 48 hours.

  12. On July 7, 8, and 9, 2007 surface 8-hr max O3 was above 70 ppb in the Great Lakes Region and Ohio River Valley

  13. Analyzed TES TCO in the grid box [75W to 69W], [30N to 38N] for: All 2005-2008 Step and Stare Observations June-August 2005-2008 Global Observations How does TES-retrieved TOC during this event compare to climatology?

  14. TES (Step and Stare) TCO Climatology (2005-2008) Boxes show 25th and 75th%. Whiskers show 5th and 95th%. • TES measured TCO values ≥ 60 DU in the pollutant outflow region are at the 95th percentile of all Special Observation measurements made in July (2005-2008). Note: Boxes show 25th and 75th%. Whiskers show 5th and 95th%.

  15. TES (Global) TCO Climatology (June, July, August 2005-2008) • TES measured TCO values are ≥ 60 DU in the pollutant outflow region and are at ≈ the 75th percentile of all Level 2 measurements made in June-August (2005-2008).

  16. TES, OMI, WRF/Chem (raw), MOZART-4 (raw) Tropospheric Column Ozone

  17. TES, OMI, WRF/Chem, MOZART-4 Tropospheric Column Ozone Time series along TES track • Results shown before applying TES and OMI averaging kernels • TES measured the highest TCO values; OMI/MLS measured the lowest TCO values

  18. TCO 600 hPa < P < 800 hPa

  19. Conclusions • Spatial pattern of July 9-11 air quality event is captured by WRF/Chem. • For this particular TES flight track, TES tropospheric O3 column > WRF/Chem column; OMI >MOZART4 > OMI/MLS column • Average TES bias: 8 DU for Tropospheric Column Ozone • TES detected elevated ozone off the coast, in agreement with WRF/Chem and MOZART-4 models, illustrating continental outflow of pollution. Polluted air mass originated over Great Lakes and Ohio River Valley within previous 48 hours. • The high TES TCO values detected in this episode are at the 75th (95th) percentile of all July Global Survey (Special Observations) data. *Acknowledgements: Gregory Osterman, Mark Schoeberl, Dylan Jones, George Grell, Steven Peckham, Xiong Liu, Louisa Emmons.

  20. This study is a work in progress. Possible next steps include: • Analyze sensitivity of results to domain through a nested 36/12 km simulation of event (TES retrieval on edge of 12-km domain) • Investigate sensitivity of WRF-Chem calculated O3 to convective parameterization, deposition module, chemical mechanism, and boundary conditions. • Compare WRF/Chem to Canadian flight data (Border Air Quality and Meteorology Study [BAQMS]) on July 8, 2008 around Lake St. Clair • Compare WRF-calc and satellite-retrieved HCHO/NO2 tropospheric column ratios for insight into chemical regime • Compare WRF-calc PM2.5 to measurements • Compare with additional TES retrievals.

More Related