1 / 22

# Structure functions and intrinsic quark orbital motion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Structure functions and intrinsic quark orbital motion. P etr Z ávada Inst. of Physics, Prague. Introduction.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Structure functions and intrinsic quark orbital motion' - nikki

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Structure functions and intrinsic quark orbital motion

Inst. of Physics, Prague

• Presented results are based on the covariant QPM, in which quarks are considered as quasifree fermions on mass shell. Intrinsic quark motion, reflecting orbital momenta, is consistently taken into account. [P.Z. Phys.Rev.D65, 054040(2002) and D67, 014019(2003)].

• Recently, this model was generalized to include the transversity distribution [A.Efremov, O.Teryaev and P.Z., Phys.Rev.D70, 054018(2004) and arXiv: hep-ph/0512034].

In this talk:

• Relation between structure functions and 3D quark momenta distribution

• Important role of quark orbital motion as a direct consequence of the covariant description

[full version in arXiv: hep-ph/0609027].

• Input:

• 3D distribution

• functions

• Result:

• structure

• functions

• (x=Bjorken xB !)

F1, F2 - manifestly covariant form:

g1, g2 - manifestly covariant form:

• In the limit of static quarks, for p→0, which is equivalent to the assumption p=xP, one gets usual relations between the structure and distribution functions like

• Obtained structure functions for m→0 obey the known sum rules:

Sum rules were obtained

from:

1) Relativistic covariance

2) Spheric symmetry

3) One photon exchange

• In this talk m→0is assumed.

Structure functions are represented by integrals from probabilistic distributions:

• This form allows integral transforms:

• g1↔g2orF1↔ F2 (rules mentioned above were example).

• With some additional assumptions also e.g. integral relation g1↔ F2 can be obtained (illustration will be given).

• To invert the integrals and obtain G or DG from F2or g1 (main aim of this talk).

g1, g2 from valence quarks

g1, g2 from valence quarks

E155

Calculation - solid line, data - dashed line

(left) and circles (right)

• g1 fit of world data by E155 Coll., Phys.Lett B 493, 19 (2000).

• In a similar way also the transversity was calculated; see [A.Efremov, O.Teryaev and P.Z., Phys.Rev.D70, 054018(2004)]. Among others we obtained

- which followsonly from covariant kinematics!

• Obtained transversities were used for the calculation of double spin asymmetry in the lepton pair production in proposed PAX experiment; see [A.Efremov, O.Teryaev and P.Z., arXiv: hep-ph/0512034)].

1) Deconvolution of F2

• Remarks:

• G measures in d3p, 4pp2MGin the dp/M

• pmax=M/2 – due to kinematics in the proton rest frame, ∑p=0

• F2 fit of world data by SMC Coll., Phys.Rev. D 58, 112001 (1998).

2) Deconvolution of g1

Remark:

DG=G+-G- represents subset of quarks giving net spin

contribution - opposite polarizations are canceled out. Which F2

correspond to this subset?

Calculation:

In this way, from F2 and g1 we obtain:

• Shape of ΔF2 similar to F2val

• Generic polarized and unpolarized distributions DG, G and G+ are close together for higher momenta

• Mean value:

• Numerical calculation:

• g1 fit of world data by E155 Coll., Phys.Lett B 493, 19 (2000).

• Forget structure functions for a moment…

• Angular momentum consists of j=l+s.

• In relativistic case l,s are not conserved separately, only j is conserved. So, we can have pure states of j (j2,jz) only, which are represented by the bispinor spherical waves:

<s>, Γ1: two ways, one result

-covariant approach is a common basis

Spin and orbital motion

• for fixed j=1/2 both the quantities are almost equivalent:

• more kinetic energy (in proton rest frame) generates more orbital motion and vice versa.

• are controlled by the factor , two extremes:

• massive and static quarks and

• massless quarks and

• important role of the intrinsic quark orbital motion emerges as a direct consequence of the covariant approach

Covariant version of QPM involving quark orbital motion was studied. New results:

• Model allows to calculate 3D quark momenta distributions (in proton rest frame) from the structure functions.

• Important role of quark orbital motion, which follows from covariant approach, was pointed out. Orbital momentum can represent as much as 2/3 j. The spin function g1 is reduced correspondingly.

Basis: