1 / 18

Religious Change in the Parishes

Religious Change in the Parishes. Religion & Religious Change in England, c.1470-1558. The Reformation – before & after:. Pre-Reformation:. Post-Reformation:. Story of loss: Monasteries Chantries Altars Christ’s Body & Blood Relics Images of saints Pilgrimages Guilds

nike
Download Presentation

Religious Change in the Parishes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Religious Change in the Parishes Religion & Religious Change in England, c.1470-1558

  2. The Reformation – before & after: Pre-Reformation: Post-Reformation: Story of loss: Monasteries Chantries Altars Christ’s Body & Blood Relics Images of saints Pilgrimages Guilds Whitewashed walls • A parish religion: • Communal (where faith met community) • Based on ritual, on DOING Shaped by actions – actions dependent upon liturgy – liturgy dependent upon material culture Removing that culture was traumatic • Prevent expression of belief • Prevent the community worshipping the divine as it had for generations

  3. Contrasting experiences:

  4. LOOKED, SMELT, & SOUNDED DIFFERENT • ACCESS TO THE SACRED CURTAILED – POINTS AT WHICH THE SACRED & THE PROFANE MET ERADICATED • IF LATE-MEDIEVAL CATHOLICISM DEFINED BY TANGIBLE EXPERIENCES OF THE DIVINE IN THIS WORLD, THE REFORMATION CLEARLY DRAMATIC & TRAUMATIC But……

  5. The conundrum: • A decidedly ORDERLY Reformation….. • We expect to see a revolution – but what marks England’s Reformation out above all else is how quietly this was all achieved. • Problem: English laity not want a Reformation; but neither did they act to prevent it from happening.

  6. Historiography: • Traditional school – kicking out the rot: • ‘Had to’ happen: Reformation a bad form of religion replaced by a good one • Revisionists – the ‘long Reformation’: • LMC buoyant – even in Elizabeth I reign, surprising legacy of traditional religion; ‘Protestant nation’ problematic • Mary I – could have restored Catholicism if lived longer • HVIII/EVI – broad acceptance: • Lukewarm in religion? • Moral dilemma – Crown or Conscience? • Negative – fear the consequences of resistance • Positive – duty-bound to obey • ‘Grumbling’, ‘hesitant’ – not convey moral agony that accompanied change • Mary I: • A change in belief; or ‘nothing happened’?

  7. Evidence: • Illiteracy: • Problem – reading ideas from actions • When ‘ordinary’ people appear, usually in courts – typical? • Wills: • Quantification possible • Preambles – who entrust soul to? What want done about it? • Problem – homogenous; scribe or individual? • Material Culture: • Fabric of the Church/ trace its objects • Church accounts: • Expenditure of the community • Trace when they implement changes; and which ones they ignored. • Later reigns – Church attendance seen as an effective form of calculating resistance. • Authorities only really keen to assess after 1559

  8. The Process of Change: • Who implemented change? • Local people • Churchwardens (appointed by the parish) • Clergy • Often continuity across reigns (often communal hostility) • INDIVIDUAL CONSERVATIVES/EVANGELICALS COULD HAVE A DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT • The Tudor State? • Not autonomous • Relied upon will/compliance of the people • No roads/news networks/police • Importance of the gentry • HVIII an unlikely ‘Stalin’ • Makes obedience remarkable

  9. Obedience? • Rex – dominant ethos of HVIII’s Church • Constantly tested authority at a parish level • Response was generally consistent • When royal will was clear, work carried out obediently • Hutton – English/Welsh ‘a limited capacity to sustain any beliefs attacked by both leading Churchmen and by the Crown’ • Remarkable capacity of the monarchy to compel obedience • Duty – outgrowth of Orders/hierarchy • Own desires/needs less significant to the body politic • ‘Grumbling Reformation’ – not a particularly dramatic narrative • Obedience not = agreement; compliance not necessarily passive.

  10. Cities: • Interests of lay rulers better served by acquiescence than by challenging royal will • CONFORMITY CONCEALS A WIDE RANGE OF DETAILED RESPONSES • Variety & breadth: • York – conservative city • Charge of disobedience following the Pilgrimage of Grace • Subsequently an ostentatious display of obedience • But revelled in the return of the Mass under Mary • Bristol – made a virtue of neutrality • 1530s: disputes between corporation & clergy triggered by Latimer’s sermons • Authorities pulled back from pursuing further reform; explicit in following royal will as closely as possible • 1540 – ask Cromwell to send visitor to ensure things done correctly • Norwich • McClendon – ‘quiet Reformation’ • Kett’s rebellion suggested that true feelings may be elsewhere

  11. Disobedience: • Considerable indication of a reluctance to change: • Anecdotal, not empirical • Speedy return to Catholicism under Mary • Reluctance to go beyond the law in reform • Anger: • Cromwell received plenty of information about hostility to attacks on imagery in 1530s • 1543, Chilham (Kent): vicar ordered to destroy the Rood; used the King’s Book to protect images; locked officials out of the church; JPs protected them. • Clergy under considerable pressure: • Lay anger at clerical conformity; 1549 Western Rebellion triggered by the new liturgy • Beverley, 1536 – curate read injunctions against Saints’ Days; parishioners responded that ‘they would have their holydays bid and kept as before’. • Were these issues of ‘evangelical’ or ‘conservative’ beliefs/principals; or the reactions of communities who had been organising their own religious lives for generations and resented outside encroachment?

  12. Iconoclasm (or, how it happened): Sale: Concealment: Objects buried/pasted over (whitewashing needed repeating): Wakefield – 25 alabaster images in the loft Flawford (Nottingham) – 3 images hidden under the floor of the chancel Commissioners wise to them: Morebath– vicar had to appear 4 times before they were satisfied he had not hidden the Church vestments ‘Cooking’ the books – rich parishes making meagre returns Wycombe (Bucks) – wardens concealed 3 sets of vestments/Catholic liturgical books/3 crosses/altar cloths/ 2 censors/ 9 candelsticks Could have carried out the Mass if they had wanted to. • Parishes involved – sell objects • Not happen TO them – shaped it. • Objects associated with saints/ the Mass • Range of motivations: • Evangelism/Protestantism • Compliance with official policy • Paying for new objects they were required to purchase • Prevent that State getting its hands on their wealth • BUT – emotion? • Keep their goods in the community • People taking ownership of objects donated by their kin • Often given back to the Church under Mary • Much of this material no longer in the Church; but certainly in the parish

  13. Theft & Despoiling: • ‘Why not’? • Someone is going to profit from this • A pre-Reformation problem – Reformation a market for opportunists: • Essex returns – some churches robbed repeatedly in EVI’s reign • Hertfordshire – commissioners issued a special report on theft • Dissolution an example to follow? • Legitimised looting • Combined with persistent evangelical propaganda against sacred objects • Easy to move into the mental space to loot it

  14. Division & Conflict: • Opportunism: • A lot of ‘stuff’ now on the market • Kerrrrching! • Buy at knock-down prices • Corruption? • Great Bromley, principal purchaser William Cardinal (Lord Mayor & the royal commissioner for Church goods) • ‘Community’ ruptured: • Divisions between those who supported reform; and those who did not • Those who profited from the dismantling of late medieval Catholicism; and those who did not • Marian legacy: • Recriminations – scarred the community • Marian churchwarden on Stanford-in-the-Vale: Edwardian ‘wicked time of schism’ in reference to previous wardens’ accounts • Marian legacy: • Corpus Christianorum • Mass – a rite of peace • Charity of Christ unified the community • Kiss of peace in the pax ensured the ending of feuds • Ending it caused dissention

  15. Inculcating the new: • Removing the old much more successful than implementing the new. • Churchwardens’ accounts show much, much slower to purchase new aspects of liturgy: • Prayer books • Bibles • Erasmus’s Paraphrases Considerable foot-dragging…….. Church Court records reveal a disinclination to reform beneath the surface of compliance.

  16. Marian Joy: • True colours? • Theology not religion – for those on the ground, tradition spoke volumes • Society feared change: why? • Truth = universal; universal = unchanging – what always true must be true. • The Mass: • Miles Hogarde– return to a time when England lived in ‘marvellous love and amity, in true dealing and honest simplicity’ • Mass heart of this system • Unity in Church • Assimilation of God within the community • Galvanize support for Mary: • Summer 1553, spontaneous celebration • Even though still technically illegal • Ireland – John Bale horrified to see clergy/laity arrive with old trappings – ‘they mustered forth in general procession most gorgeously all the town over’. • Restored with vigour under Mary: • Centre of Catholicism • Works righteousness (not Faith Alone) • Power of priests as mediators – need the Church to channel grace. • Purchase of Mass paraphernalia/ altars • Structural work – rebuild altars/purchase correct texts

  17. ‘Nothing happened’; or a ‘broken Catholicism’? • Big question: was pre-Reformation traditional Catholicism changed by experience of conflict/persecution • Unsubtle to conclude ‘no impact’: • Pre-Henrician Catholicism not simply ‘restored’ • Institutional changes • Economic considerations (made it impossible) • Two considerations: • 1) Time was short – Mary d.1558 • 2) Monasteries/Chantries a dramatic blow • Revolution in landholding/MPs reluctant to restore • Significant impact for concepts of death

  18. ‘Nothing happened’; or a ‘broken Catholicism’? • Will-making shows a decline of belief in purgatory and the saints: • Prayers for the dead/to saints changing • Obits/bede rolls/provisions for intercessory prayers not regain pre-Reformation levels • Decline of chantries – porous nature of natural/supernatural changed • Within the Church – the Rood took precedent over saints’ images • Christocentrism • Wills suggest moves towards a more Christocentric form of devotion • A response to the challenge of reform? • Joan Holder (1556) – bequeathed soul to ‘God my creator and redeemer unto whose mercy I commit myself unto, trusting by the merits of his passion to inherit the kingdom of heaven to pray for me’. • ‘Broken Catholicism’? • Not ‘restored’ but ‘re-vitalised’ • New fervours of piety defined Mary’s Church • Not conservatism, but a Reformation in its own light • Anticipating Trent? • Many reforms undertaken at Trent present in Marian England • Mary an agent of reform; not a bulwark of conservatism • Christian Humanism vital

More Related