1 / 35

NYCC Anushka Paul Jonathan Shrem

NYSED John Brock Larry Paska , PhD. 2012 Annual NYLA Conference and Trade Show: Writing Our Next Chapter The Networked Library: A Moderated Panel. NYCC Anushka Paul Jonathan Shrem. Checkpoint. Goals

nicole
Download Presentation

NYCC Anushka Paul Jonathan Shrem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NYSED John Brock Larry Paska, PhD 2012 Annual NYLA Conference and Trade Show: Writing Our Next Chapter The Networked Library: A Moderated Panel NYCC Anushka Paul Jonathan Shrem

  2. Checkpoint

  3. Goals • Gain knowledge on the use of web 2.0 technologies in education and how to empower usage of such tools. • Become aware of the benefits and concerns surrounding educational networking, and how schools, districts, or states may alleviate any inhibiting factors. • Understand the impact that a networked library can have on student achievement. • Understand what policies or protocols can be leveraged to create a successful pilot program using educational networking as an example. About the Panel The primary goal of this presentation is to discuss the benefits, concerns, and best practices for web technology and the role libraries play in any implementation with a focus on educational networking as an example.

  4. Panelists • Lawrence M. Paska, PhD, Coordinator, NYSED Office of Educational Design and Technology • John Brock, Associate School Library Services • Jonathan Shrem, Research Associate • Anushka Paul, Research Associate About the Panelists The panelists for this presentation represent both the New York State Education Department Office of Educational Design and Technology and the New York Comprehensive Center Educational Technology Team.

  5. Checkpoint

  6. Vision of Technology for Teaching and Learning Multiple environments will exist for teaching and learning, unbound by place, time, income, language or disability. The classroom, gymnasium, laboratory, library, theater, and museum will be a workspace for teachers and learnersbut will not always be a physical space. Students will access learning resources anywhere, anytime through the use of technology.

  7. Regents’ Statewide Learning Technology Plan Goal # 4: Provide policies, standards, and guidance on quality digital content development and delivery; accessibility; information literacy; and ongoing, sustained professional development in pre-service and in-service education. Goal # 7: Develop and/or revise Commissioner's Regulations and Department policies to promote sustained support for the delivery of quality instruction for all learners through digital means. Goal # 9: Identify and/or develop incentives for the expansion of digital learning across USNY.

  8. Issues to Consider • Course Alignment to NYS Learning Standards • Broadband Capacity and Access • Standards for Online Courses • iNACOL’s National Standards of Quality for Online Courses • Content • Instructional Design • Student Assessment • Technology • Course Evaluation and Management • 21st Century Skills

  9. Some NYSED Recommendations for Teaching and Learning Online • District-level committees to examine online learning policies • Ensure adherence to principles of universal design • Assess student needs and interests for online courses • Assess online program availability compared to student need • Create and adopt local district policy for online courses • Provide professional development opportunities • Develop a district process to evaluate online content • Use common evaluation standards, like iNACOL and ISTE • Communicate with parents on online learning • Evaluate district-created and vendor-purchased content

  10. Checkpoint

  11. Established by the Board of Regents on June 3, 1894 • "to serve as a library council with whom the University officers may consult whenever the advice or cooperation of experts may be desirable." • advises the Regents regarding Library policy • works with the officers of the State Education Department in developing comprehensive statewide library and information policy • makes recommendations to the Regents concerning the implementation of the program Regents Advisory Council On Libraries

  12. Goals of the Regents Advisory Council on Libraries • Goal 1: Monitor and Advise. • Goal 2: Strengthen. • Goals 3: Communicate. Regents Advisory Council On Libraries

  13. Creating the Future: a 2020 Vision Plan for Library Service in New York State The Board of Regents and State Education Department should formulate policy and regulation that will: • Adopt and implement a statewide information fluency curriculum framework. (10) • Expand the existing Commissioner’s Regulations (91.2) to require an elementary school librarian in every school to strengthen instructional. (11) • Create incentives to encourage school districts to actively expand and promote access to the school library collection of online resources, e-books, and Web 2.0 tools.  (12) • Create incentives to encourage school districts to adopt flexible scheduling.  (13) • Create incentives for school libraries to collaborate with other libraries and communities. (14) Recommendations of the New York State Regents Advisory Council on Libraries to the New York State Board of Regents

  14. Checkpoint

  15. Libraries can be leveraged to support the New York State Regents Reform Agenda through the following five key elements: • Teacher/School Leader Preparation and Effectiveness • Early Childhood Learning Opportunities • Raise Graduation Rates for At-Risk Students • Curriculum and Professional Development • Assessment Libraries in Support of the Regents Reform Agenda

  16. Libraries’ Use of Web 2.0 Tools Source: Social Media, Libraries, and Web 2.0: How American Libraries are Using New Tools for Public Relations and to Attract New Users –– Third Survey November 2010.

  17. Libraries, as strategic partners, can utilize social networking tools to: • provide access to space, technology, and infrastructure needs. • provide instruction and guidance for development of digital literacy skills needed to effectively utilize social media platforms. • foster collaboration between all stakeholders. • create a community of learners. Libraries as Partners in Social Networking Implementation

  18. Providing Access • To physical space: • a common space for meeting and connecting. • To technology and infrastructure: • 96% of students with Internet access use social networking tools. (National School Board Association Report, 2007) • According to the 2010 release of the National Broadband Plan, roughly one-third of the population lacked broadband internet connection in their homes. • Public libraries provide the only internet access for 70% of impoverished communities. Innovation:Examples of the impact of social networking on traditional library practices

  19. Development of Digital Literacy Skills • Training opportunities: • From 2008-2010, there has been an increase in public library training opportunities available for all learners. • The number of public libraries offering: • informal point-of-use assistance increased from 52% to 79%; • formal training classes increased from 35% to 38%; • and the number offering online training material dramatically rose from 3% to 30% (Public Libraries & The Internet, 2011). • In 2009, 52 million people obtained help using technology from a librarian or volunteer, and 16 million took advantage of public library offered computer classes (Clark & Visser, 2010). • Digital services: • A 2007 University of Michigan study showed that a total of 23% respondents stated that “yes” or “maybe” they would be interested in contacting librarians through social networking sites. • Searching library databases has gone mobile. Through apps, such as “AccessMyLibrary”, students have the opportunity to access library resources and media on specific topics 24/7. Students can receive sources for homework, hobbies, research, and more, all free once a school is registered. Innovation:Examples of the impact of social networking on traditional library practices

  20. Collaboration • Library programs promote teacher-student, peer, and professional collaboration using social media, including opportunities for individualized instruction and 24/7 communication opportunities. • Teacher-student collaboration: • “Destiny Library Manager” a program, promoting communication between students and teachers. • Peer collaboration: • “LibraryThing” is a site that promotes collaboration among students. • Professional collaboration: • Programs such as “The Teacher-Librarian Network,” provides professional development to teachers regarding social media implementation. Innovation:Examples of the impact of social networking on traditional library practices

  21. Community outreach • Encourage the building of a community of learners through the implementation of social media. • Teach students, teachers, and parents about internet safety and cyber bullying. • Establish a presence on social media platforms to update students and parents on relevant resources, information, and events. • Share recommendations for reading, reviews on books, and instructional resources with students, teachers, and parents. • Host student-created videos, photos and discussions to engage a community of learners. Innovation:Examples of the impact of social networking on traditional library practices

  22. Checkpoint

  23. coined by Steve Hagardon, the founder of Ning • use of social networking technologies for educational purposes • aligns with federal and state goals to promote innovative and collaborative technology Embracing “Educational Networking” ____________________ Educational Networking. Educationalnetworking.org. Web. 1 Feb 2011. <http://www.educationalnetworking.com/>

  24. develop a pilot program • set a criteria for pilot schools • develop an agreed-upon appropriate use policy for educational networking • deploy pilot with an accompanying evaluation process in place • develop a network with schools, community-based organizations, and cultural institutions Implementation of Educational Networking Programs The Process

  25. Update when crisis, issue, or situation indicates a need for policy change • Periodic updating • Key factors in causing many districts to have to review their AUP • Increasing extent of use of cell phones and other mobile technologies by students • Two positions on specifying Web 2.0 Policy Guidance

  26. Best practices • Digital Citizenship • Accessibility • Freedom of contributions • Platform options Procedural Guidance/Best Practices

  27. An AUP for educational networking could include the following content: • Description of goals/purpose of educational networking • Explanation that other school policies and laws also apply to educational networking sites • Explanation of the limits of privacy in online environments • Reminder that it is difficult to perceive “tone” in online communications • Clear statement of expected online behaviors • Clear statement of unacceptable and dangerous online behaviors • Guidance for administrators, teachers, and parents for managing inappropriate behavior and escalation of misunderstandings • Guidance for teachers for maintaining personal privacy and serving as an exemplar for appropriate online networking behavior AUP Process Development

  28. Roles and Responsibilities • Timeline for Pilot Implementation • Pre-Implementation • Choose the Educational Networking Committee (ENC) • Develop or refine the AUP • Ascertain District Readiness • Choose Platform • Choose the Sample for the Pilot • Implementation Design Phase • Plan program evaluation • Post-Implementation • Use of educational networking with the Sample • Conduct Evaluation • Develop a plan to scale the project Implementation Plan

  29. Checkpoint

  30. Moderated Discussion Question 1 • As a leader for library programs at NYSED what do you see as the main impact that a networked library can have on student achievement?

  31. Moderated Discussion Question 2 • How can you empower libraries to drive educational networking activities? What suggestions do you have for districts?

  32. Moderated Discussion Question 3 • Do you see library services as limiting the burden and risks associated with the implementation of social networking programs in schools? What suggestions do you have for schools?

  33. Moderated Discussion Question 4 • What can districts do with the guidance set forth by NYSED to empower the development of networked libraries?

  34. Checkpoint

  35. NYSED John Brock Larry Paska, PhD 2012 Annual NYLA Conference and Trade Show: Writing Our Next Chapter The Networked Library: A Moderated Panel NYCC Anushka Paul Jonathan Shrem

More Related