1 / 11

Cold Snap Task Force Update

Cold Snap Task Force Update. Stephen J. Rourke ISO-New England May 21, 2004. 20. 15. 10. 2004. Temperature (F). 5. 0. - 5. - 10. 1984. 1971. 2004. 1994. 1965. 1988. 1974. 1983. 1996. 1986. 1963. 1973. 2000. 1979. 1962. 1991. 1989. 1992. 1967. 1998. 1960. 1980.

nguyet
Download Presentation

Cold Snap Task Force Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cold Snap Task Force Update Stephen J. Rourke ISO-New England May 21, 2004

  2. 20 15 10 2004 Temperature (F) 5 0 - 5 - 10 1984 1971 2004 1994 1965 1988 1974 1983 1996 1986 1963 1973 2000 1979 1962 1991 1989 1992 1967 1998 1960 1980 1993 1990 1968 1976 1981 1982 1961 2003 1970 1997 1977 1999 1972 1966 1987 1969 1964 1985 1975 1978 1995 2001 2002 New England Cold Temperature HistoryJanuary saw the sixth coldest temperatures in 45 years.

  3. Winter Cold Snap Summary Generation Outages in MWs

  4. ISO Actions to Protect New England • Ordered offline generation and transmission back in service • Requested voluntary conservation from public • Coordinated with North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) and Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) • Arranged for additional imports from adjacent Control Areas • Issued alert of impending capacity deficiency followed by emergency procedures to balance supply and demand • Requested manning of substations as precautionary measure, based on lessons learned from August 14th blackout • Kept regulators and public informed of system conditions

  5. Cold Snap Report Key Findings • Electricity and gas markets performed reasonably well • Availability of gas for non-firm generation customers affected gas unit availability: • Dual-fuel units had much better availability than gas-only units • No evidence of anti-competitive behavior • No evidence that economic outages approved by ISO-NE exacerbated reliability issues or resulted in increased electricity clearing prices • Supply offers for gas-fired units were affected by timing inflexibility of electric market • Electricity markets provided only weak incentives for units, especially gas units, to be available during the Cold Snap

  6. Cold Snap Task Force • Formed at March 19, 2004 FDWG-EGWI meeting • Three meetings held to date: • April 5 • April 15 • April 29 • Broad Stakeholder Representation • ISO-NE • NEPOOL Members • Natural Gas Industry • Various NE State Agencies

  7. Cold Snap Task Force • Several straw proposals presented to begin addressing the market timeline issues and associated system reliability concerns • Cold Snap Working Group formed to deal with possible market changes to be implemented for winter 2004/2005 • Possible Alternative: Move up the “Market Process” by 12 (?) hours – Straw Proposal #1

  8. Next steps • Schedule next working group meeting(s) • Continue development of market timeline straw proposal, including market impacts • Detail all technical impediments to be resolved • Develop trigger mechanisms • Develop communication plan • Prepare for Cold Snap Task Force and NEPOOL Markets Committee in June

  9. ISO-NE Priority Items for Winter 2004/2005 • Formalize interaction between ISO Operations and Natural Gas pipeline operations • Communication protocols • Sharing of operational information • Notification of major events • Address market timeline issues under “event driven” conditions • Maximize use of existing dual fuel capabilities • Verify existing capabilities • Document facility specific operating issues • Address permit limitations

  10. Questions?

More Related