What s next cold fusion super low cost power generators vying for mainstream spot light
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 56

Cold fusion, Tesla, Scalar wave, Torsion field, "Free energy", "Over-unity"... PowerPoint PPT Presentation


Quietly Started New Paradigm Shift by Ultra efficient Cleantech with Disruptive Scientific & Economical impact

Download Presentation

Cold fusion, Tesla, Scalar wave, Torsion field, "Free energy...

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


What s next cold fusion super low cost power generators vying for mainstream spot light

PART 2 OF 5

What's Next "Cold Fusion”?.. Super Low Cost Power Generators Vying for Mainstream Spot Light

  • Torsion field, scalar wave, tesla… fundamental Paradigm Shift by Ultra efficient Cleantech with

  • Disruptive Scientific & Economical impact

  • Ben Rusuisiak

  • New nature paradigm TECH analysis

  • VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA, Updated Sep25, 2016 www.linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm


Cold fusion tesla scalar wave torsion field free energy over unity really all pseudo science the coming par 7446605

ABSTRACT: LENR-Cold Fusion effect itself has been virtually accepted by mainstream science, & currently it is in gradual spread to industrial, “fringe”, & non-western media: Energy produced with basically free “fuel” + equipment & operation cost. Although unadmitted by creative interpretations, thermodynamic over-unity or "excess" Persistent Current is observed & discussed for quantum level nano device as well as in relation to beyond Shockley-Queisser limit efficiency solar cell, and non-linear optic/laser/spintronics technology. As of Sep 2016, no mainstream endorsed LENR device exists, but 1MW industrial electricity generator "Ecat" has been sold under pre-conditions. 、 Low cost resonance based major emission reducerswith 10%+ extra efficiency, solid state thermo Electric/thermo PhotoVoltaics heat-to-energy systems, & highly efficient Waste-To-Fuel/Energy systems with Catalytic, SuperCritical water, Cold or Steam Plasma mechanics are starting to make into mainstream quietly in last few yrs.These types of changes indicate coming first full science review of ridiculed yet recurring inventors' hyper energy efficiency claims & commercialized small installations: e.g. 1-Extracting ambient-radiant energy as electricity, 2-Harvesting reverse voltage power without using force to cancel it(Back EMF), 3-Resonance catalyzed HHO/Oxy-hydrogen gas, also as mileage booster, 4-Electromagnetic or cold plasma pulse/vortex creation in confined water/inert gas, 5-Compressed air & COP>1 heat exchanger converted to mechanical power, 6-Catalyzed emulsion fuel with far beyond 50% H2O, 7-Hydrocarbon increased by std photocatalyzed O2 Nanobubble based fuel+water emulsion, when infused with CO2 in room temp/pressure. +variations, 8-Combining underwater air floating force & gravity, 9-Propellantless drive,10-Hydrodynamic cavitation heater, 11-Betz limit excess hydro/wind turbine, 12-Pyromagnetic self running heat producing trash decomposer, etc. They often seem to run on mechanics & accompanied by side effects current official physics cannot explain(explained by Russian Torsion physics or pre-Heaviside Maxwell equations), low cost, & are convertible to superior new techs that can replace majority of propulsion, weather, medical, nuclear remediation, time dilation, psychology, & some key mining-industrial-farming processes -IF fully peer reviewed in science.、 At this paradigm changing stage, it might become also relevant to reference increasing documents/testimonies on above alternative physics based covert “open-end pseudo science” R&Ds by groups across Gov’t/Aerospace/Military/Intel agencies & private contractors, protected under national security, but to which above organizations’ executives often have no access i.e "unacknowledged" black project. This is totally isolated from “dead-end public consumption science” which is monitored & restricted by “science law”: e.g. At an advanced nation, even official data indicates, 1000+ inventions in Enviro-Energy-Propulsion-Medical field, many patented, are classified by secrecy law, & applied to allies. Despite all this, there are subtle but collectively clear signs that a majority of establishment is attempting to release unlimited “Open System” new paradigm technologies. Although both gas-oil-coal based industrial process & conventional alternative energy can remain by innovation, Mainstream commercialization of "0 emission type unlimited energy production" system's is inevitable & it risks social disruption, hence public participation is beneficial to discuss if, or at what rate & how all related tech/info to be officially released & endorsed.

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Contents

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Contents

p06 Looked over science legal high efficiency energy generators

p26 Solar & Wind power efficiency beyond official science law.

p43 Utilized but sometimes forgotten Biomass/Waste-to-Energy

P68 Biomass II, Largely ignored clean natural gas

p78 Ten categories of “over-unity” claims

p99 Commercialization attempts

p116 Law of Thermodynamics, “Dissident” scientists

p119 Scalar “wave”, Standing wave resonance, Torsion field..

p145 Terahertz & Far Infrared waves, “No light” Photo Catalysis, ORMUS..

p168 LENR/Cold Fusion update, Losers & Gainers by its success

p181 Reduced suppressions, energy paradigm smooth transition models

p191 Ramifications if inventor tech becomes mainstream

p223 Already in use? - Zeropoint Energy related "outrageous" claims

p265Summary & Macro level recommendations

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Qualification of information

Qualification of information

This presentation primarily focuses on less known but latest science consensus forming technologies, while some of highest efficiency low cost techs contradict predominant view, especially of Wikipedia & Western media/NGOs. Hence attendants/readers are recommended to re-assess the data from own independent perspective

Regarding Controversial But Future Critical Technologies Discussed: ■ Term “Free energy” or “Over-unity” in this presentation is defined as seeming as if: -1 Drawing of more energy than exerted to generate -2 Continuous motion without energy input -3 Using free material generally not considered as fuel、 ■ Inventors-scientists-witnesses: their claims might involve higher likelihood of: -4 Fabrication, reliability exaggeration, or statistical error chance of observed effect -5 Significant quality gap between inventions, yet - -6 At least far above collective majority seem to repeatedly produces claimed effects

Currently more detailed reference list is being produced & will be published separately: The research is updated based on reviewing academic papers & journals, books, speeches, presentations, patents, lab/commercialized product testimonies/complaints, publications & public records of NGOs/media/research institutes/think tanks/military/space & gov't agencies/industry associations. Most effects quoted have accumulative-consistent evidence from unrelated era & source, but mechanics listed are hypothetical. Commercialized company/products are shown in Boldface Navy

THIS FILE IS PART 2 of 5SERIES: ENTIRE 5SERIES CAN BE VIEWED IN ONE FILE AThttp://www.slideshare.net/BenRusuisiak/free-energy-pseudo-science-new-nature-paradigm-on-energy-technology-34087356


New perspective lowest cost energy from vast biomass 26 algae

new perspective - “lowest cost” energy from vast biomass -26, algae

•4 OTHER BIOMASS,: ✔4aOil bearing Algae: Mainstream groups emphasizes price parity is far away, but some of pilot type commercialization/full commercialization product seems to be lowest cost in some selected cases while cost is coming down rapidly:

α-LOW COST ELEMENTS: its high caloric content, order(s) of magnitude higher oil yield per growth area than many biofuel crops, or artificial indoor farming(Solazyme+) with efficient-fast-economical & easy harvestability-processing, outdoor system types utilize unproductive sun exposed warm land, might prefer human-undesired quality water(waste, toxic, sea/brackish)、 β-PROCESSING EASE: Most of utilized algae have no lignin & very little cellulose content, processing is mainly to do with algae lysing(what happens if electroporation effect is used?) which is far simpler & lower cost than other biofuels even with conventional treatment methods.Extraction process after initial biocrude stage can be fit to conventional petroleum type processing system which reduces cost, also gives refineries control of pricing in case biocrude becomes much lower cost: non distruptability during energy cost reduction steps : eg Sapphire Energy vs Tesoro, Phillips 66, Algae.tec + Algenol vs Reliance Industries, Cellana vs Neste, Solazyme Industrials with own refinery.、 γ-COST DERIVATIVES DEPEND ON VALUE ADDING FACTOR: Becomes lowest cost fuel if processing is done at locations with high cost energy availability, or fuel portion within algae oil grade separation can be cost-adjusted with higher priced separated grades from the same run: eg fuel grade vs higher value Omega3 etc -->> continue

68

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


New perspective lowest cost energy from vast biomass 27 algae 2

new perspective - “lowest cost” energy from vast biomass -27, algae 2

-->>cont: •4 OTHER BIOMASS: ✔4aOil bearing Algae:

Some companies are making vaguely or clearly defined commercialized offering (Abca BioSolutions Pvt, UniVerve, Qeshm Microalgae Biorefinery BAYA fuel, TereGroup, Bio Fuel Systems SA+), Notable recent cautional public remarks amongst producers since 2014 about commercialization, especially in US. 、 Some works in conjunction with waste water cleaning & CO2 sequestration as algae growth "fertilizer", when this cost is considered, it becomes lowest cost fuel in most places(also in some cases it would net some energy availability after water processing)(MBD Limited, Algae Enterprises+), Possibly ignored in mainstream due to super low cost High Rate Algae Pond tech(NIWA - Solray Energy nz - Muradel Oil), Easy low cost fast process by recovering oil/pellet/briquettes for steady production(Algae-Industries.com)

Additionally one can say cost is naturally low since they utilize well known lowest cost processing actions(amongst experts) that are for some reason most of time overly avoided in other fuel making or agriculture processes: 1-naturally all plant enhancing CO2 feeding, 2- Sub-Supercritical water type treatment(some use it in addition to or exclusively algae cell wall degrading oil extraction by enzymatic/chemical/ultrasonic/supercritical CO2 or alcohol/electroporation-electric pulse etc methods).

69

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


New perspective lowest cost energy from vast biomass 28 peat

new perspective - “lowest cost” energy from vast biomass -28, Peat

-->> cont: •4 OTHER BIOMASS:、✔4bPeat: Overall severely underharvested except locally overharvested Ireland & Baltic sea region: consumption against growth is negligible. As a renewal resource level, it is recoverable worldwide at very least 120-150million tons/yr (2010-13ave world production 40million). Even by carbon tests showing of annual peat growth of 0.7-2.8mm with "massive overproduction"at Baltics, Near city area North America & Europe in last 70-150yrs+, either peat growth is higher than mainstream accepted figure or so is recoverable volume in these region, or both.

Also at some large peat resource nations it is almost completely unused or not even officially listed(Congo, Brazil, Papua New Guinea+), Bog-Wetland & Extreme North conservation movement is helping to stop peat from entering into world fuel market(also this might successfully prevent land Gas Hydrate extraction) .

But if Peat is considered non-renewable asrulingWestern mainstream group claims(mainly American led group is overriding mainly European lobby like IPCC that calls peat green fuel) actual world Peat volume availability is similar to Coal reserve but much cleaner fuel, which would cause severe overflooding of energy supply to trigger disruptions in energy pricing & infrastructure if fully exploited. -->> continue

70

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


New perspective lowest cost energy from vast biomass 29 peat 2

new perspective - “lowest cost” energy from vast biomass -29, Peat 2

-->> cont: •4 OTHER BIOMASS:✔4bPeat: Hence seemingly for various political & economical lobby reasons it is currently not harvested to even close to the capacity, or used for other purposes even if peat is usually lowest cost fuel available eg Canada, Russia at 1/20 level harvesting against growth

Higher margin gained when sold as Growing Media for exports(Latvia[Laflora lv+], Estonia[Sangla Peat AS+], Lithuania[Rekyva+]+), Almost all production goes to Horticultural or other industrial related markets (Canada[Lambert Peat Moss, Sun Gro Horticulture, Earth Care Products SPHAG SORB+], Germany[Klasmann-Deilmann+], UK[Northern Peat & Moss Company+]+), Often 2nd largest world Peat producer nation Sweden is mainly(but not mostly) for local energy use(Söderenergi, Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget+), also Finnish backed group involvement there(Neova bioenergi),

Although revenue is lower, fair portion produced for fuel(Ireland[Bord na Móna]+), Share with garden market use & specifically as stove briquettes(Ukraine[Volyntorf+], Belarus[Торфобрикетный завод Лидский+], Russia[ЗАО "ВяткаТорф"+]+), Sometimes subsidized(higher margin to sell to garden substrate market) to secure large volume electricity generation(Russia, Finland[6% of total power is peat, 35% world peat production share][Vapo Oy, Turveruukki Oy - Oulun Energia, Kuopion energia, Vaskiluoto Voima+], 50%+ in some regional power generation, can reduce SO2 emission of coal when mixed), Some small production nations are using peat exclusively for fuel/electricity generation on local basis(less than million ton/yr)(Indonesia, Rwanda[HQpower Rwanda], Brundi+)

71

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Occasionally lowest cost energy clean under utilized methane

Occasionally “lowest cost” energy: clean Under-utilized methane

■Under-Utilized MethaneUnconventional extraction method of regular Natural Gas: Unclear differentiation from existing Natural Gas. Magnitude of supply volume seems to far exceedexisting reserve of conventional hydrocarbon hence highlighted here as occasionally lower cost energy

●1Methane Hydrate-Clathrate/Gas Hydrate: Confirmed to be located mostly either offshore near continental shelf area ocean bottom, or Permafrost land underground in polar regions(Messoyakha gas field: Gazprom Neft: only publicly known full time large volume operation), or in high altitude permafrost region(Qiangtang Basin China+). Crystalized Methane combined with water in specific geometric form, as mantle derived methane surfacing into ocean/near surface is trapped in water under high pressure and low temperature. This ice like formation can remain so under pressure at substantially above 0°C temperature(mainstream approved idea). Recoverable accumulation is so far found to be 100m to several kilometres thick.

General mainstream consensus available volume at least exceeds entire conventional hydrocarbon resources(some "economically incorrect science" use nations" such as China/Russia projects order[s] of magnitude higher). Highly disruptive information as this can undermine profitable "peak oil" appeal & cause overflooding of energy market if extracted in mass. Although current test overall production cost is higher than Natural Gas from deep ocean, land base extraction can be already on par or lower due to shallowness, & this will likely easily go lowest cost in high fuel cost regions as full operation occurs: -->> continue

72

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Occasionally lowest cost energy clean under utilized methane 2

Occasionally “lowest cost” energy: clean Under-utilized methane -2

-->> cont: ■Under-Utilized Methane: ●1Methane Hydrate-Clathrate/Gas Hydrate:

Most of gas hydrate or a portion of ocean bottom hydrate can use conventional drilling & extraction related methods, No need for economically & environmentally expensive fracking, Shallower depth than many natural gas wells: depth is 100m+ range in Arctic, 500m+ in other regions etc, land or water.But so far indication is drilling might need to be moved to nearby area quicker than regular gas wells if based on existing technology - if same tech is used higher cost? Studying the past track record shows, if exploiting this resource is important to mainstream group they would usually come up with "revolutionary" new technology in few years (eg fracking for Shale oil or deep well developing methods etc.). Currently officially applied or tested main methods are Thermal injection(hot water/steam), Depressurization, & CO2 replacement methods etc.

Temporal wells: Ignik Sikumi(US), Mallik(Canada), Atsumi Peninsula 400m off Coast (Japan), Permanent types;(Mount Elbert)(US), all negligible production volume (0.01million m3/day range): Some of known participators: ConocoPhillips, BP,Vnnigaz Gazprom «Газпром ВНИИГАЗ», Oil and Natural Gas Corporation of India,GNS Science, German gas hydrate initiative,日本メタンハイドレート調査 JMH, JAPEX 石油資源開発,

Also smaller private operators participation: Hydrate Resources Corporation+

  • 广州海洋地质调查局, 中国地质调查局, 가스하이드레이트 사업단 Gas Hydrate R&D Organization

73

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Occasionally lowest cost energy clean under utilized methane 3

Occasionally “lowest cost” energy: clean Under-utilized methane -3

-->> cont: ■Under-Utilized Methane:

●2Coalbed Methane(CBM)/Coal Seam Gas(CSG): Started as coal mine de-gasification program for safety in 1980s in US. Natural gas contained in highly porous coal molecule structure & seams in relation to bacterial action/generation(speed of CH4 production seem to widely vary by conditions), also fair volume of Methane would be additionally produced by injecting CO2 into the coal bed which bacteria reduces (removing oxygen) to Methane for future yield(Golding-Rudolph-Esterle+): (see Abiotic oil p216-220)

As of 2014 close to 2% volume of Natural gas world wide with US is more than its 80% share, helped by government back up. Mainstream western media's CBM volume idea is often about 1/20-100 of Natural gas volume reserve, but full scientific consensus projects rather on par volume with Natural Gas:Western media often quotes fringe segment of mainstream(somehow main media never calls them pseudoscience) that ignores massive oil & other hydrocarbon availability world wide at publicly known & less known sites in order to still advocate peak oil idea.

Natural gas would be likely gradually shift to CBM in the future as main gas source. CBM promoters emphasize on it is able to stop methane escaping for carbon foot print reduction, or gas is actually overall even less emission(sweet gas) containing than conventionally extracted natural gas, while preventor groups focus on repeat of fracking water issue etc. -->> cont

74

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Occasionally lowest cost energy clean under utilized methane 4

Occasionally “lowest cost” energy: clean Under-utilized methane -4

->> cont: ■Under-Utilized Methane:●2Coalbed Methane(CBM)/Coal Seam Gas(CSG):

Some new production areas would be lower cost than existing energy source despite extra water handling issue: Much shallower depth etc. Different types of technology (eg altered type hydraulic fracturing is already used in Australia) might be needed to fully tap its potential:

Main coal reserve nations have large potential: i.e. US(ConocoPhillips, Consol Energy, Bill Barrett Corporation+), Canada(Ember Resources, BP Canada+), Australia(QGC Pty - Shell, Arrow Energy+), Russia is less likely to develop major volume soon given current large production of Natural gas(Газпром промгаз Gazprom Promgaz+), Germany: their definition of CBM & CMM(Coal Mine Methane) is mixed as a large portion of it comes from closed coal mines(STEAG New Energies+), India(Essar+), China is likely to have most incentive to develop in mid term with strong state involvement(PetroChina, China United Coalbed Methane Corporation - 中联煤层气有限责任公司+), while some privates attempt to expand(Green Dragon Gas, AAG Energy+)

●3Coal Mine Methane: When coal is mined, methane is emitted & vented as hazard, but not recovered when yield was inconsistent or mix of other air(20-60% CH4) etc, but now this "free energy" is starting to get recovered more - this also makes the gas lowest cost in some situations(Energy Developments, GreenGas International BV, Shanxi Jincheng Anthracite Coal Mining Group Co Ltd / 山西晋城无烟煤矿业集团有限责任公司+). Often CMM doesn't include high consistently yield methane streams because it becomes its own well.

75

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Mainstream pseudoscientific free energy claims

mainstream “pseudoscientific free energy” claims

Senior Western scientists followed academic protocol for peer review 1-LENR-Cold fusion: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction -1989, Heat generates as H2 (hydrogen) in water interacts with catalyst(Ni-nickel, Pd-palladium etc) at electrolysis when stimulus applied(heat, current, resonance+)(Pons, Fleischmann), Unexplainable side effects: of helium produced(partly similar to nuclear fusion)but very minute neutron/tritium/x-ray, and no gamma ray2-Cavitation: Micro bubble fusion / Sonoluminescence / Acoustic-ultrasonic cavitation— 2002, Extract energy from imploding & light emitting bubble in liquid by acoustic wave excitation, “Semi science legal” mechanics(Taleyarkan et al+)

■ Both linked via “solid state fusion” phenomena elements ■ Many repeated previous mainstream claims(LENR since 1925, Cavitation 1978, but above were observed by “top mainstream scientists” triggered first serious review、 ■ Mainstream fusion: some system cost hundreds of million$+/yr(also p94-95) -ICF: Inertial Confinement(US National Ignition Facility+) -MCF: Magnetic Confinement(ITER- Tokamak, 30+ others) 、 ■ LENR & Cavitation quickly “proven false”, “No results” fusion$ criticized, yet “COP>1” Hydrodynamic + Sonic Cavitation was already commercialized in Ex-soviet nations(p87) and scientists win national invention award(Kazakhstan+ : V Kuchin+)

76

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Academia s lenr cavitation vs inventor tech

academia's LENR-Cavitation -vs- Inventor tech

■ Similar physics law breaking mechanics & “anomalies” both at LENR-Cavitation & inventor techs, but latter more openly admit ■ Past main academics explain related mechanics(Webb, Kelvin, TJJ See, Dirac, Faraday, Whittaker, W Crookes, Poynting, Loschmidt, Kaluza, Maxwell, Myshkin+) ■ Covert compartmentalized inventor type “pseudoscience” including gravity field propulsion(Bushman, Rosin, Wood, W Pawalek, J Black,McCandlish, D Morris+)

■LENR-Cavitationbothhave large variations, each sub-variation tends to have similarity inventor tech,& although not openly, increasing number of their scientistsstarting to suspect itslink & need for investigation(Jinchuan Shen+) ■ But almost all of following pages’inventor type techs were investigated in depth or developed & a few commercialized(eg Potapov, Mustafayev+) by Russian/ex-Soviet university/institute academic: significant diversity allowedunlike West

Science in Russia even in Soviet times, while data access from West was often restricted, was generally more free than West including less compartmentalization. But Soviets banned genetics, cybernetics(mind control link, deemed classified), & non-marxist philosophy/economics by reasoning “bourgeois pseudoscience”. Sociological data was also falsified/classified for counter intel purpose against West

77

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 1 2 ambient energy back emf

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy 1,2 ambient energy & Back EMF

Micro sized private/commercialized use, often multiple mechanics devised by single inventor: most of following 1-11+ category has 100+ inventors claims、1-Non-moving coil - Radiant energy/Ambient Electricity Inducer(Chernetski, Hendershot, Tesla, Baumann,Craig, Hyde,Thrapp,Adams,Gritskevitch, Moray, J Murray, Hartmann, Flynn, SE Jones & Kraut, DL Smith, Perez-Torres, PJ Kelly+), Often transformer like setting of pair(s) of coils with Magnet/Ferromagnetic core or Bifilar coil in specific position against EM field(opposing, orthogonal+), or Configured to trigger resonance, or some are simple RLC circuit type, with separate source & load batteries in circuit. Might involve high voltage + no electricity (p126-131, Relation to Scalar “wave”, Radionics, Antigravity-:Godin, “Gene altering”: Lu Bürgin+), After repeated & on-going demo mainstream debunking Commercialization started: SteornOrbo,

2-“Magnetic Motor”- often Back ElectroMotive Force(EMF) Harnessed (Watson, Schappelle, Kawai, Reed, Heins, Ide, Parendev, Roshcin, Kenyon,Tracy, Tewari, Reed, Christie & Brit, Steinmetz, Ward, Sumaruck-+), Often DC pulse timed spin of magnet imbedded rotor(Torsion field; p119-144), similar to monopole magnet(Fauble), Cold electricity(supercurrent) harvest by causing electron avalanche in open air(Magratten), Can cause weather change(Dav Wells+), EMF by electron spin at static magnetic field by time-varying magnetization in magnetic tunnel junction(zinc-blende-structured MnAs nanomagnet: Pham Nam Hai +)

78

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 1 2 ambient back emf 2

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy- 1,2 ambient & Back EMF 2

—>> 1-Non-moving coil Ambient, 2-“Magnetic Motor”continue:➢Common in1&2: Often separate source power & charge battery/capacitor used, Some need external power. Bypassing regular “self-cancel dipole power circuit” in order to keep asymmetry & electron flow, Energy output exceeds input when reach threshold level, 、

➢Often claimed anomaly in1: mix ofRegular & Cold electricity:(Obolensky+), ●“Electron Vortex” idea: a-Ball lightning as its manifestation, b-Electrons can be in vortex form by default(Tewari+), c-Tesla Coil as electron vortex generator, ●Positive & Reverse energy:Bulb lights up in water, White light, Rapid battery charge, Fix some dead batteries, Can besingle wire(Zenneck wave relation?) & wireless connection, Voltage with 0 current, Invisible force radiates,、●Device transforms/extracts ambient-thermal energy as electricity in endothermic form from environment: Absorbs heat,Device can go below 0°C,Scalar "wave" link(p126-131), Cone-toroid-pyramid shape circuit seems to help,Often capacitor based high DC voltage pulse trigger, Spark gap, Intentional spike (choking effect, also can happens when reg current is switched off) starts rapid inflow. Seems to coincide with Electrical Resonance but more than just impedances cancel each other out: something extra "comes in" 、●Transverse wave vsLongitudinal wave - “negative entropy”(negative resistor: Ga Kron+), Macro equivalent of 100%+ quantum efficiency by multiple-exciton/electron effect

79

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 3 hho oxyhydrogen gas

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy- 3HHO, OxyHydrogen gas

3-“Overunity” H2-HHO-Brown’s gas production(Klein, Zigorous, Lawton, F Wells, A Blue, Rhodes, Ste Ryan, Raju, Pantone,Pacheco, S Chambers, Kanarev, Y Brown, Gre Vezina, Eaton+), Commercialization fully existsmainlyas on-board Hydrogen/HHO generator for combustion enhancing to match maximum limit in Faraday's laws of electrolysis level: mostly scaled down 10-25% gas saver(eg Empire Hydrogen, HHO HFS Pty, WaterToGas, Hydrotechnix, HodPros, CVHHO: 200+ companies), Water emulsion fuel combo(Cynergi Holding SA+)

Less disruptive 2-10% saving Implied by mainstream market targeterswith vague tech explanation(Bluetip Power, dynaCERT+): even lower saving than more widely used(but firmly western pseudoscientized) no maintenance needed often super low cost Magnetic or FarInfraRed(FIR) wave emitting solid state device fuel treatment e.g. Multimag pl, Fuelmax lv, MAGNETIZAGUA SYLOCIMOL +), rare German TÜV passed 15% fuel saving device(Maratech ag TiziCALOR), or nano FIR ceramic in oil additive(Ceramic Power Liquid+), micro EM field/FIR wave of certain "form" by laminated layers of different electrical potential minerals to augment combustion(Nanotech-beam SatoCompany+). While openly explained ones at mainstream level gets debunked & go out of business in N. America (CHEC hydrogen+), they get mainstream support in Europe(h2gogo, Creoproject+).

Massive price gap with same quality exists. Non-western major corp. involved(Norinco+), Rare 30-60%+ saving claims(Shinko-Trans, Giriraj Electronics+), Even 2% saving is “impossible” in Mainstream West: “cannot save fuel by making ‘fuel’ from running engine”, due to “unbreakable universal law”(p116-118),

80

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 3 hho oxyhydrogen gas 2

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy- 3HHO, OxyHydrogen gas 2

-->>cont: 3-“Overunity” H2-HHO-Brown’s gas production:■ Typical auto “fuel cell": 12V powered 6-7 flat stainless steel plates per “stack”, +-unseparated electrolyzer, assisted by EFIE(electronic fuel injection enhancer), PWM(pulse width modulator), MAP(manifold absolute pressure sensor), Distilled water + KOH electrolyte, Gas “bubbler” etc, ■ So far “water only run car”(ie overt Faraday law violation) type services never continue operation: some claim to have repeated visits or phone calls & “told not to”(Boyce, Rasmussen, B Williams, S Meyer, Pantone+).

■ 100% water run cars aren’t really by electrolysis?- eg: ●Sympathetic resonance of entire set with standing wave, ●Cold electricity by high voltage capacitor spark trigger(p78,79), ●Resonating cylinder cavity(p89), ●Plate gap <1mm, ●Venturi/vortex air or water mist sucked in at intake(0 energy use), ●Magnetizing gas/water, ●Cavitation, ●Oscillating EM field etc, ●Some even prefer deposits on electrode(S Cramton+), ●0 electricity/0 electrolyte use: radio waves etc:

Water often seems to decompose by something else rather than by energy: "information?", Hydrogen bond angle altered?(J Ellis+), Ambient energy used to loosen bonds?, Also link seems to exist with LENR-Cold Fusion & Sonoluminescence Cavitation(M King+),

81

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 3 hho oxyhydrogen gas 3

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy- 3HHO, OxyHydrogen gas 3

■HHO related water anomalies:High voltage pulsed water can explode: overunity like & strange phenomena generating Electron Charge Cluster(A Ilyanok+), similar Shock Electrodialysis(M Bazant, RM Crooks+), Plasma discharge in SuperCritical Water(Kaz Terashima+), Electrohydraulic Effect(insufficiently explained by mainstream: Graneau, Verdoold+): Desalination effect, Generates EM field, double cavitation shockwaves, ultrasound, ultraviolet, x-ray, Significantly increase rock-soil-peat nutrient(Cifanskis+) & water permeability to plants, Instantly alter metal structure, Chemical catalyst+ (Yutkin, Bekaev+),

It's used for precision high end manufacturing(eg Bmax, Fujico CPC process, Trakonta - Траконта +), or from industrial rock to kidney stone crushing etc.(Similar to possibly torsion field related Magnetic Pulse Forming [Smb-group.ru, PST Products+]) Other anomalies: Radioactivity remediation(V Roth+), More energy than available gas(And Michrowski+), “Vitalized” water+

82

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 3 hho oxyhydrogen gas 4

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy- 3HHO, OxyHydrogen gas 4

->> hho gas cont: ■ Range of unconventional effects: Not really hydrogen; Water with extra H2 bond or electrons?; Burns in vacuum or underwater(no air intake/exit),Burns sprayed liquid water in open air(linked to Electric arc has more power in mist/water than in air[Frungel+]), adheres to matter, Pressured back to water, Heavier than air(hydrogen is much ligher) - can bepoured(G Wiseman+), Flame is electrical plasma rather than burning, High powered laser like effect with far lower input: makes metal rust resistant/glazes concrete(eg Best Korea Brown+), Cold flame 130-280°C (no bond breaks unlike when H2 burns at 2000°C+), Direct flame doesn’t boil water(B & T Lang+),

■ ButIncinerates at1600°C,VaporizesTungsten(3400°C): burns at subatomic level? Nuclei Superdeformation link?- Ormus connection?(p154-166, p220),Disrupts molecule bond(electron breaks off water molecule at matter reaction causing heat(Eckman+), Implodes in pure form(Suartt, Knudston+), Mix isExplosive: HHO+H2: can call hydroxy/oxy-hydrogen, Much higher quality & almost fumeless faster metal cut + alien matter welding, surface cleaning, ampoule fillingetc(Epoch Energy+), “Improved version” of Injection/Water Shield/Steam Plasma cutting, Similar to Pulsed arc Water Plasma(Мультиплаз-Multiplaz) effects.Far more gas produced than H2 by same energy, hence much lower cost. -->>cont:

83

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 3 hho oxyhydrogen gas 5

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy- 3HHO, OxyHydrogen gas 5

->> hho gas cont:■ Mix well with most conventional liquid & gas fuels in industrial boiler-furnace(eg Aquygen+)+: Cut emission(50-85%+, less effective on NOx), Engine & exhaust system cleaner(eg E&E HHO+), more power, Rare claims of water only run cars(S Meyer, Dingle, Cornish,Yogev, Garret, Leaich, Estevel, Waqar Ahmed, Valentin, Mohd Ali, Abd Shukor, M Suematsu, Khan, P Lowrie, Rusetel, Bordeianu, Ghu Sarwar, TP Edirisinghe, Purushottam Pipaliya +), varied mechanics, some can run with dirty water, most insist on resonance as key element.

Sub form; “acoustic vibe” claim Ohmasa Gas: clustered HHO”,Flame 700°C, Liquid at -180°C(O2:-183°C H2:-240°C), Higher fuel cell performance than H2? Little risk of explosion, Can run combustion engine in vacuum/space, Easy low cost <10kg/cm2 or 143psi storage, Larger molecule ie less leaking, same indication from SG Gas,

Rarer methods of overunity H2 or HHO gas making claim that are lab tested- eg: No catalyst applied optical pump excited UV radiation treatment of water vapor in resonant cavity(Leslie Reach) etc. Signs of resistance by some stronger 3rd world gov'ts(eg India, Pakistan+) of not suppressing this tech & remaining indifferent against various Western establishment pressure.

84

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 4 cold plasma pulse

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy- 4Cold Plasma pulse

4-Plasma or “Virtual power” Inducer-Exploder-Imploder with inert/noble gas/water inside(Papp, Britt, Rohner, Ke Rauen, Ray, Correa, Clem, Pantone, Schaeffer, Neil, Valkinburg+): Vacuum-Ambient energy, EM pulse, or some resonating thrust power extracted in a container/engine/cavity, to exert power with or without moving parts, Vortex energy?, Joe Cell link(Booker, P Stevens+), Einstein had initial Reich’s Orgone confirmation but stopped(Mallove+), Often MHD/LMMHD (Liquid Metal) resembled mechanics: some kind of ionization/excitation/plasmafication of inert gas is involved. Exact mix ratio of Water/Air/Steam/Oil/ or various Noble gases is used as “energy substrate” in closed container, Also “activated Nitrogen” can be used?(RJ Strutt+),

-a Often works asrapid compress-expand cycle pulse(also ionized noble/inert gas emits bio enhancing light/scalar type & EM waves simultaneously:J Jirard, Or Fitz+) in sealed or pressured fuel less enginesetup:ion oscillated, triggered plasma energyfrom Zeropoint field?Electron Charge Cluster(oxymoron)?, But electrons attracting each other at superconductivity state is science legal(Cooper pair+),LENR-Cavitation-HHO link(K Shoulders, Jin, Fox+), -b Use of extra “non linearity” type power just like happens with water hammer-cavitation in steam/water system?, Usually this phenomena causes design to be adjusted or use extra energy to eliminate the effect, -c Some have mutli-layered resonant cylinder: collect “power” & send to engine

85

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 5 compressed vortex air water

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy

5compressed/vortex air & water

5-Some Air Vacuum/Compressed Air or Steam Engine, Temperature Gap Amplified (Heat)Energy Exchanger/Vortex Tube/Hydrodynamic Cavitation Heater, Hydraulic pumpsclaim occasional “perpetual motion” depended on run(L Rogers, Frenette, Minto, Davey, Yeter, Pope, Eskeli, Cahill, R Meyers, Truitt, Willimczik, Tesla, Hill, Karimov, Troyan, Von Platen, Azarov, Alexeiv, Obadan, Potapov+), a few are consistently overunity,

Similar to4without plasma, Often involvesabrupt change in cavity,(pressure<->vacuum: air flow - some oscillates,temperature, evaporation, reheating released cold air), System is low maintenance with less moving parts, Ambient heat converted to mechanical motion(Ke Rauen+), Anomalous “gap” in energy used vs harvested to breakLOTD(Low Of Thermo Dynamics)? Also if calculated airflow kinetic energy recovery of some devices, it breaks Benz Law: SheerWind-INVELOX (Allaei). Can involve steam or venturi,

86

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 5 compressed vortex air water 2

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy

5compressed/vortex air & water 2

—>>continued-5-Compress air-Hydrodynamic Cavitation:■ Active full commercialization: Disguised but practically free either power generation or hot water(eg FlowGroup), COP>1 heaters: Ion Heater(Stafor+), Similar results with Vortex Induction Boiler(Юрле-К Yurle), Vacuum Radiator(Отопление-ГВС.РФ). Cavitationdevices: egFisonic(pump resonated by geometric two flow mix, similar to Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube), Warmbotruff, Graviton-M,ДЭВА Dewa Pulse etc (spinning rotor/water to pulse) feature overunity pressure or heat, while Western originated peers “hide” same abilities(Hydro Dynamics, ECOP Wärmepumpe +), Space type use “superconductive” heat pipe: eg Qu Tube(NASA),

■ But when efficiency is measured based on affected area(eg COP on Flash Evaporation Cooling), commonly sold air conditioning-fridge-heat pump efficiency goes COP>3(300%) as “official common sense”, some 6 or 7: This area seemshighly fudged and energy generation link seems to be avoided by mainstream: this category 5 techs seem to include conversion of this overunity into continuos mechanical motion.

87

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 5 compressed vortex air water 3

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy

5compressed/vortex air & water 3

->>cont.-5-Air Vacuum/Compressed Air Engine, Heat Exchanger etc on overunity element■ Same way as in heat pumps, another overunity Population Inversion(Thz Ultrafast EM Pulse link, E Paspalakis+) is also openly "allowed" byLOTD; in Laser(optical cavity resonance) it is even precondition, but again power generation by its use is mostly mainstream avoided ■ ”Advanced No-leak” Hydraulic Ram(TG Allen[Hydrautomat], Kutienkov+/no incoming water pressure) water lifter, used in mainstream till 1930s

Deemed by some as part of core mechanics in category-5A-“Temperature gap of outside device vs thermodynamic pressure vortex cycle inside”, “1st & 2nd LOTDcontradiction”, “Perpetual motion of second kind” effects, эффект Крапивина (Krapivina effect), Mainstream in Russian physics(Smenkovsky, Kosinov, Filippov, Tsyolkovskiy, Oparin, Yakovlev, Lazarev, Buynov, AV Shubnikov+), others(Kondepudi+).

If it is Thomson Effect, why compressed heated air released & cooler than pre-inserted temperature?, COP>1 by “Compressed air + heat created”. Kinetic energy by ambient heat & pressure(S Robertson, J Scott, Lindemann+), At right pressure & geometry, overunity steam heat/pressure is norm(Sychikov+)-->>cont:

88

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 6 reactionless drive

“Inventor pseudo science” free energy

6reactionless drive

->>cont.-5-Air Vacuum/Compressed Air Engine, Heat Exchanger etc on overunity elementB-”Unseen energy” tends to “show up” or flow from low or negative pressure, voltage etc to high, or at vortex outer to centre(Schauberger, H Iijima+), Vortex flow or rapid ambience gap sneaks in vacuum energy by “leaking through“ space?,

6-Some ofReactionless, Propellantless Drivetech claims overunity effect(Shawyer[EM drive], Yang Juan, He Serrano, Menshikov, Ro Cook & Thornson, Gui Fetta[Cannae drive], Ath Nassikas[Superconducting Thruster, works only at <70K]+); all witnessed by numerous physicists/engineers multiple of times

Scissoring Gyro, Geometric wave Resonator Cavity(EM) or pulsing against space, Standing wave resonance accompanies. Participators are inventors + space agencies + private contractor mix. Mechanics Using “vacuum fluctuations of virtual plasma”? = Zeropoint Energy(ZPE), Electrokinetic force?, -->>cont:

89

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 7 gravity base

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy- 7gravity base

->>cont.-6-Reactionless Drive: ■ Additionally “pseudoscientific” by breaking conservation of momentum “law”: Propulsion by asymmetry(unbalanced forces) of geometry cavity or magnetic field flow. ■ Also directly links to other inventor type free energy mechanics or vacuum energy extractiontheoretical modelling(Da Cole, R Forward+), like Cavity Quantum ElectroDynamics(drives quantum computer), Stochastic ElectroDynamics (allows quantum effect on classical environment- covers "economically incorrect scientific effects": room temp superconductivity, or Scalar wave relation[p119-131] etc),、 Due to mainstream Western institutions like NASA got results on it, major effort for damage control by mainstream media/blog for debunking

7-Gravity or Centrifugal Force + Magnet(motor)(Simpson, Ribero, Ewert, Campbell, Bedini, Rutowski, Milkovic, AlKhooss, Ucros+), Practical some large size various models exist(eg 20x7x10m piston type) but no open commercialization. Requires precision: timing, weight balance, some by “gravity shielding”, Also SMOT - Simple Magnetic Overunity Toy model(G Watson, Finsrud+) type “perpetual motion” in closed loop displayed but low cost energy generator is currently impractical

90

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 8 h2o 50 emulsion fuel

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy- 8 h2o>50% Emulsion fuel

8-Some Hydrocarbon-Water Emulsion Fuel Techsclaim 50 to almost 100% of H2O as fuel, i.e.water burns, not mere disperser/atomizer: C+H2O --> CO+H2, or HHO Cavitation/HHO tech link(p76, 80-84)(Pillai, Dellschau, R Gunnerman,VS Afanasyev,Capra, Franch, Enricht, Al Globus, Cottell, Chambrin, Kurata, Hommoh, Baranov+), Diesel is easier, Often produced on site, not pre-made, Some can be also used as catalyst, Rare high level academic claimed photocatalytic & nanobubble infusion based emulsion itself causes CO(reduced CO2) & H2 mix to be "copied" to hydrocarbon(Tad Imanaka, p218).

Active full commercializationis limited to low end level 50-75% water mix (eg Fukai Soken, Eneco-hd+), Some superior tech companies attempt mainstream penetration with 50% range water mix product & abruptly change course(Next Alternative inc+), brought anger from establishment?, 30%+ emission cut - less effective than HHO(p80-84), -->>cont:

91

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 8 h2o 50 emulsion fuel 2

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy 8 h2o>50% Emulsion fuel 2

->>cont.-8- Hydrocarbon - Water Emulsion Fuel:■Emulsion is well funded academic research for almost all relevant applications(except almost non-existent for emulsion fuel in most of west).Discrete large corporate/diesel backing/own development: Kawasaki Hvy, NYK etc. Less discrete: Caterpillar has been most openly active in sponsoring emulsion fuel including disruptive "pseudoscientific range 50%+ water" types which was retracted from market quickly: A-55(R Gunnerman). Rare event for major Fortune 500 corporate to involve.

Actually this inventor also produced 70-80% water version, but this was not commercialized since engine modification was needed- this engine design issue comes back to numerous engineer inventions with 50-200%+ more efficient engines: see p17 - major mainstream taboo to research. And from Gunnerman invention lineage, only Gas+Oil mix 10% fuel saving new composite fuel was allowed to commercialize fully(Advanced Refining Concepts). -->>cont:

92

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 8 h2o 50 emulsion fuel 3

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy 8 h2o>50% Emulsion fuel 3

->>cont.-8- Hydrocarbon - Water Emulsion Fuel:Various combo mechanics for fuel making, Sometimes differ from science legal emulsion:、➢ Mechanical: ●High pressure, ●Nanobubble, ●Sonic & Hydrodynamic Cavitation (venturi) & spraying, ●Simply repeating emulsion process with each time 50% water addition with same combustion power per unit, ●Sub-SuperCritical water treatment based “instant” emulsion(water becomes superlow dielectric constant to easily mix with non-polar solvent), ●Acoustic, ●Often seems to be one step double emulsion Water-in-oil-in-water(w/o/w), (o/w/o), or Gas in water in oil(g/w/o), (g/o/w) - even multiple types, 、➢ EM wave: ●Magnetization, ●Electrolysis, ●Resonance, ●Lenard Effect, ●Torsion “information wave”, ●Rotating Magnetic Field, ●FIR irradiation or emitting ceramic ➢ Others: ●Minerals, ●Plant polymer or some kind of nano-micelle(Tannic acid, Saponin mix+), ●Bioceramic process, ●Water-fuel bonder,

Some claim direct water-fuel co-feeding, or ”transmute” waterto fuel,

93

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 9 aneutronic fusion

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy- 9 aneutronic fusion

9-Super Compact Fusion:Dense Plasma Focus/Lawrenceville Plasma Physics(Lerner), Infra cost0.1% of mainstream fusion,no radiation, use Boron, no H2 isotope, Inventor tech link, US Navy backing,Almost mainstream, Experimentalsuccess resultssince ’09,yet difficulty getting funds, Other aneutronic fusion: Bussard- EMC2 success shelved?, Russia involved private US company big name funded Tri Alpha: really only 0.5milli second sustained fusion?,

Long sustained fusionincluding conventional thermonuclear with suspected possibility for Net Energy Gain(Max Planck Institute: Wendelstein 7-X, Lockheed Martin- Farnsworth link, B Maglich: Migma cell, Chinese Institute of Physical Science: Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak+),

Official Energy Positive: National Ignition Facility(NIF US) in 2014 is often quoted as first time ever, but JAERI/JAEA(Japan)/Hitachi/Toshiba had repeatable & sustainable practically Q=1.25 success at ITER JT-60 since 1998 but often interpreted as invalid due to actual tritium was not used. Improved JT-60SA(inductive coil, longer pulse) is officially under construction since 2013 till 2019(as of Feb 2016 still 90% complete) -->>cont:

94

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 9 aneutronic fusion 2

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy- 9 aneutronic fusion 2

-->>cont: 9-Super Compact Fusion:JAERI/JAEA: It is notable new JAERI/JAEA system is being built to test how long it can gain energy continuously with how much more than Q>1.25, not to test whether if it can produce more energy than input. European JET had unofficial success in 2004? but then shutdown for major upgrades...

Considering Western mainstream debunking/selective ignoring of overwhelming accumulating evidence of economically inconvenient non mainstream LENR or Fusion like mechanics since 1925,even Huemul Project(R Richter) in 1950s Argentina could have also achieved Q>1 fusion?

Other types with large funding are not reported to have net energy gain: Various magetized types etc. Even home made sustained fusion itself can be made, particularly low powered Fusors(Farnsworth invention),(Jam Edwards, Ta Wilson+). Other types: eg Dusty Nano Fusion(Gyö Egely)+

Also given various anomalous pseudoscientific effects often claimed, & continuing very expensive funding of largely non-performing projects at facilities, it might be reasonable to speculate fusion research is partially or mainly involving unofficial hyper-dimensional physics experimentation by testing various high powered rotating plasma/non-neural plasma type effects(exaggerated effect of rotating lights or microplasma/magnetic field) : "manipulation of spacetime fabric"

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 10 floating air gravity

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy- 10 floating air + gravity

10-Underwater Air Buoyancy Power Generator, “Pneumohydraulic” Engine:(J Kwok, GM Singh, Ribero, Dobrokhotov, Grigoriev, Schrade, Elistratov, W Travis, Spiteri-Sargent+)Often large sized 5-30m Water tank(s) in hight, Repeat cycles of air container floating- sinking(Air input at the bottom, which floats up & release air at the top, then weight causes container to sink by gravity),

Other types include air floatation mechanism use water pump to generate water fall - under which water turbine is placed for power generation etc. Energy output-input ratio 3 to 20:1, Air heating/cooling or compression-expansion elements might be involved, or ambient energy sneaks in like compressed air engines?

Non western mainstream endorsed; Science legal except its over-unity, even ultra mainstream Energy Globe Award winning!(Gozo-Spiteri below), this news is naturally completely ignored along with similar prior examples by main media/academia/enviro NGOs, presumably due to economy/business consideration background, but even left out by many “free energy” research groups. This mechanics’ claims are far less attempted compared to other “utterly illegal” techs, Active commercialization& pilot projects(eg Rosch Innovations,Spiteri-Wasserpumpe+) -->>cont:

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 11 others ambience types

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy- 11 others Ambience Types

11- Other mechanics don’t fit to1to 10category;Less replicated, some science legal(also p9-16): Ambience types: a-Crystal/geometry/pyramid electro inducer (Trawoeger, Grandics+), b-Graphene & Carbon nanotube(CNT) generator, c-Alpha Voltaics: α-particle emitter isotope cell(M Meyer, Mace+), d-Negative Static Resistance Self Oscillator(Sweet+), Electrical Soliton Oscillator (D Ricketts+), Gyrator or Negative Impedance Converter can to generate power(T Kuipere, Gra Gunderson+),

e-EM wave to power converter & charge battery, often Barium Titanate use(DeGeus, M Reid+), f- Aerial static-ground current flow extractor/Ambient Electrostatic Motor(Lea, Britten, Matchett, Plauson+), “illegal” version of tree/earth only battery or atmospheric electricity extraction,g-Self heating resonating ceramic material, h-Given # of “free energy” claims by plasma, vortex, cavity resonance, pulse, flow dynamics, too few MHD claims(Gritskevitch+): classified for weather mod/space weapon/air-liquid flow & shockwave control(JP Petit+)? -->>cont:

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Inventor pseudo science free energy 11 others water types

“Inventor pseudo science” free

energy- 11 others Water types

—>Cont 11- Other mechanics: Water types: *some of below are mainstream academic virtually approved*a-Instant H2(also p20): Sealed inert gas chamber with Amalgam-Alluminium based alloy(ER Anderson), Ceramic membrane(Bakhir), Monopole magnet (Ehrenhaft), Nano Geometric shape Aluminium (S Khanna*+) +,b-Urine (NH2)2CO or Saltwater Na++Cl-+ H2O “overunity" gas(Gamgee+),

c-Sun light using 24hr working battery: ci-Galvanic-corrosion-overunity water cell(Cater+), “self charge-separation” water effect, unlike most Water Powered Clocks, cii-Bat Gen: Melanine based photo-electrochemical self-renewable cell(Solis-Herera),

d-Hydrodynamic cavitation electrical generator(Grander+), e-10,000volt Lenard Effect(Kelvin*+)- linked to ElectroHydroDynamic Electrospray aerosol charge & ElectroScavenge - ElectroFreezing effect based weather modification, f-Resonance water pump(Bentley, Bellocq, Dickinson+) gauges more water lifting than energy applied, g-Magnetic-vacuum water freezer/boiler at room temp.(I Siegel+)

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


World trend when inventor starts establishing new tech 1

world trend; when Inventorstarts establishing new tech.. 1

■ "Free energy" demo usually witnessed, some thoroughlytested by mainstream scientists on personal or military/aerospace/intel capacity, not academic, using high-bandwidth digital oscilloscope+.

Pulse triggered device or cold electricity is difficult to measure its performance, Most of volt & amp meter only claims quickly found to beerrors(PG Bailey+), but a few turn out “unexplainable”, Then testing scientists avoid public comment or say “It appears the effect is true”. Local media or sometimes even national media covers positively: “This will change the world, Surely Nobel prize if real !”- but often never reported by media again.

■ Inventor tech blanket debunker & lab duplication failure quoted even in alternative energy field ■ These events are ALWAYS ignored by high ranking "reputable" tenured mainstream academics that allows peer review;”perpetual motion or energy is against physics law”, “if it’s real we would’ve known it within last 200yrs+, hence such effect cannot exist”

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


World trend when inventor starts establishing new tech 2

world trend; when Inventorstarts establishing new tech.. 2

Free energy researchers(Vesperman, Bearden, C Walter, Frazier, Loder, Aftergood, Tutt, Joe Garbon, R Nelson, D Kenyon, J Manning, L Pea, Bird, Germano, PJ Kelly, Decker, O’Leary, Elswick, Jo Eisen, S Hasslberger, Br Ostrowski, Jam Robey +) finds typical scenario wheninventors attract investor funds for mass production:

■Suddenly investigated as tax/Securities and Wire Fraud(US) due to “complaints”, or Impostors using inventor name with false claims(Two common phenomena at attempted commercialization), Assets seized, Fines, Active follow up by debunkers specialized only in non-mainstream claims,

■Mainstream authority & “grass roots” coordinated frequent criminal charges, “confirmed” mental disease labelling, or scandals against “pseudoscience” energy/medical is statistically unusually common when succeed(K Trudeau, Web Kehr, P Binzel, W Travis+). Same event occurs when high public/corporate rank or media person etc “does not go along with overall plan”: some of this is a part of classified standard Intel used practise?(Austin Fitts, Je Ventura, Sus Lindauer, Jo Rappoport+),■ Valid legal process if define “pseudo science” as hoax-scam, or fake charges as “real”

100

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


World trend when inventor starts establishing new tech 3

world trend; when Inventorstarts establishing new tech.. 3

->> cont; free energy commercialization prosecuted: For more prominent ones; ■ National media calls it as “pseudoscience”, & investors/local media cancel ■ Inventor helpers start fighting, funds/equipments/documents start missing ■ Backers also warned as financial-industrial security threat by (un)identified groups

■ Suddenly classified as national security risk; Tech confiscation(by Govn’t division, Intelligence agency, Private security company, Unidentified armed group, or SWAT team) with or without warrant, told to go to jail etc if discuss this event/technology, Police & media usually ignore intervention request(in some way justifiable, but process criteria, decision maker, responsibility, involved party unclearp268), this occurs world wide, not just in West, but happening less and less recently: reduced suppression of disruptive tech is observed in most industries(exception Medical+)

■ With/withoutpatent, large energy users, not producers,tend to buy inventions ■Theirown free type tech invention disappears([email protected], G [email protected] +) ■ Someinventorscontinue, without commercialization, micro private based use ■Litigation, No$, Order/supply cancels, patent bought, military-intel hire, etc+■ But now changing: Although mainstream ridiculed or ignored, recently non electromagnetic(non scalable type or only partial free energy device) are increasingly allowed to fully commercialize with no prosecution


World trend when inventor starts establishing new tech 4

world trend; when Inventorstarts establishing new tech.. 4

->> cont; free energy commercialization prosecuted: For more prominent ones; Some researches of both mainstream/fringe type firmly conclude "suppression" comes only/mostly from oil companies but this doesn't often apply:

● In Western situation often energy using companies or energy unrelated NGOs behave to stunt research/commercialization, or purchase & shelve it, while even opposite- promotion of free energy- is observed for smaller/private Western oil companies(Ton Craddock[Craddock engineering inc]+), ● Large oil companies in West actually tend to fund/develop low cost energy tech and "disruptive types" seem to be patented and shelved, while mildly effective types are commercialized. Western military & contractors companies behaves similarly.

● Non-Western state owned large oil companies seem to nurture wide range of low cost energy techs including "pseudoscience" & fund their research(eg: Indonesia, Malaysia, Venezuela, Iran, even Western ally Saudi Arabia etc). ● Discouragement of super low cost energy tech(while promoting conventional alternative energy) is rather coming form Western based network of some large corporate groups working together with various levels of Govn't, Intelligence Agencies, Private Security companies, Western Oil companies NGOs, Media.

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


World trend when inventor starts establishing new tech 5

world trend; when Inventorstarts establishing new tech.. 5

Rare cases of prominent politicians, scientists, personnel, magicians vow to testify for validity of invention(Tesla, Moray, Trombly[UN delegates], Newman, Gray, Br DePalma, T G Allen, H Coler, Ra Mills, Tewari+)

Actual criminalcase seems more likely with no tech details/independent auditing, no inventor face, photo/name/address/video interview is publicized:

a- Fake web sales, b-Valid inventor stretching claims / $mismanagement, c-“Grass roots” or fake invention to discredit/divert free energy movement(ignored by usual tech invention replicators), d-High profile group in “free energy” community collect$ to purchase/develop new tech yet keep postponing/shelving it

Yet small # of emerging high profile groups seem to function coherently not only for “tech disclosure” but for whole geo-econo-social open system movement with little influence by Western mainstream(eg Thrive movement+)

103

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Free energy challenge quest to meet academic protocol 1

free energy challenge: quest to meet academic protocol 1

Similarly, scientists assure en masse non-existence of gravity field tech, ignoring several 100s of official military/engineer testimony of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena evidence without investigation, citing indication never exists(Ri Haines, Weygandt, Keyhoe, N Pope, De Brouwer, Jo Callahan, Lovekin, Guerra, La Warren, Wi Smith, Hillenkoetter, D Phillips, Ch Halt, Ro Salas, Er Walker,Symington, Pa Jafari, R Dedrickson, Jo Maynard+)

Callers for investigation labeled “fringe theorist” or “pseudo scientist”, losing or compromising academic career(Ja McDonald, O’Leary, Friedman, Hynek, Ro Baker, Mi Salla+), while existing allegations of “trusted” senior academic is on contract with “certain group” to debunk non-std science(Sagan, D Menzel, Ed Condon & Ro Low+)

■ “Reputed” labs/schools/publications have strong tie with“reputed = large”scientist group-NGO-corporate, often disallow to test/publish“certain kind of” new science or experiment data as “it would break the law”(Ge Pollack+), ”Blacklisted” academic can be banned from student interaction at schools, mainstream science journals & conventions etc(B Josephson, Sarfatti+)

104

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Free energy challenge quest to meet academic protocol 2

free energy challenge: quest to meet academic protocol 2

■ Most large corporate research/Govn’t div has a strain whose member is fully aware of/engaged in physics law breaking performance energy(& other) techs but by secrecy contract(allegedly linked to National Security status) mainstream academic/media is never officially informed(Rug Santilli, Da Yurth, Myr Evans+): scientific corruption

■ Alleged tenured dismissal, faculty/university warned of funding cut if member studies “non-std-science”(B Martin, Jo Mack, CDF-Galtieri, Delborne, MW Ho, Hal Arp+), or for geopolitics most critical issue to be avoided(Chomsky vs Jam Tracy), but academics are keenly aware of it and mostly avoid it in the first place using “common sense”(D Lewis+) ■ Reduced chance for grant/promotion if contradicts above root assumptions even though unrelated to research theme, Differs in non-western nations(Russia, Brazil+, eg China’s Montagnier funding), or military or space agency in West(usually classified?)

• Self-endorsed circular logic; underfunded experimental research success & theory is blocked from peer review without Western corporate-NGO/media/gov’ back up, but mainstream rejects it, reasoning “it lacks peer review”,、• This combines with occasional selective peer reviews when claims are “proven false” & claimers lose funding/job, by only based on replication failures & ignored all successes(Mi Schiff+). This stops most researches, but even failure process itself is dubious; eg. Firmly alleged data change to block LENR funding(Mallove+)

105

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Free energy challenge quest to meet academic protocol 3

free energy challenge: quest to meet academic protocol 3

➢ Free energy inventor has never been investigatedofficially by modern Western full scientific protocol. In turn declared to media: “In our entire history, free energyvalidity has never been found“ ”It’s a proven scientific consensus” 、➢ Influencers can use system tocreate scientific realityby solelyselected convenient evidence(T Gold, Huyghe, McClenon+), Decisions made by use of non-scientific/empirical paradigm(Schwinger, Kuhn+), Unprecedented pseudoscience suddenly valid at geo-political events even if all experimental evidence disproves(Ri Gage, Cr Roberts, Da Ganser, BK Partin, Nie Harrit, SE Jones[LENR researcher], Jud Wood, DR Griffin, ADM Moorer+)

➢ This iscommonly observed, not exception, across science: Water, Monetary, Gene, Consciousness, Human origin, Peak oil(Bakken formation+), Biotic only hydrocarbon (p216-220), TopQuark,Big bang, Climate(p205,206), Biophoton, Ancient edifice/civilization, Archeology, Giants & Dwarfs, Medical (p195-201), Advanced tech on Moon/Mars(Brandenburg, Carolotto, Van Flandern, M Bara, J Escamilla, Ir Shapiro, Vasin, Chatelain+), History of tech-medicine-geopolitics +

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Shifting dynamics of academia media vs free energy promoter

shifting dynamics of academia, media vs “Free energy” promoter

Well documented mainstream ignored EVIL THEORY data as follows: Oil-Industrial-Financial groups’ affiliated NGOs’ controlled standardization of academics: "non-pseudoscientific" technology, official history, education(Nor Dodd+), "non quackery" medical(Ab Flexner+)etc till 1920s, to eliminate major competition & firmly set "united new reality" across the board. Based on this foundation, later diversified elites influenced, but they were asked to or voluntarily help dominant group's economy, media, political system creation/maintenance(Glattfelder, Bauer, Chossudovsky, Quigley, Ed Black, Dale Scott, Sm Butler, E Mullins, Naf Ahmed, A Sutton +):

■ Inter-funnelling funds in legal methods - interlocking share holder control, political lobby & funding etc,. Also less legal: Elite peer pressure, Secure next power job, Know each’s needs, undisclosed liabilities - some shared, Some in same “club in a club”. But more "evil type" various elite special interest networks seem to exist & they recruit new members from the following: • -->>cont:

107

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Shifting dynamics of academia media vs free energy promoter2

shifting dynamics of academia, media vs “Free energy” promoter2

-->> cont: Elite structure & EVIL THEORY, member recruitment from...:•-Elite ranks of pledged in organization/society, •-Leaders meeting like CFR-BG-SunValley Conf.-Davos etc, •-Low key tech leaders meet: eg Highland Forum, •-Senior level business-politics-govn’t networks(Joh Coleman+), •-"Neo Cons" & "Liberals", •-Bloodlines, •-“Anomalous belief/faith” groups(p253-258)(Sta Monteith+), •-Ambitious “networks” with key control of US Gov’t-Intel-Military-Media etc & covert unauditable transnational/multiple level NGO operations: hence influence world affairs(Fle Prouty+), •-“Beyond international law” groups(Ind Singh+) who can orchestrate & manage ongoing large complex criminal activities(Austin Fitts+) etc, Frequent cross over “memberships”: This type of networks might be influential in new tech suppression?

But as long as base direction is "corrected" regularly, overall economic structure seems to be formulated rather naturally than by small groups of people's constant manipulation, where "differences were mended behind scenes" to build uniform, hence credible information by Interlocked directorates exec-board swap: NGO, Thinktank, Gov’t, Corporate, Research institute, Top management consulting co, Senior academic, Investing funds, Commercial banks, Media, Social media & Search engine cos, Military, Defence contractor, Intel+-->>cont:

108

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Shifting dynamics of academia media vs free energy promoter3

shifting dynamics of academia, media vs “Free energy” promoter3

-->> cont: Elite structure & EVIL THEORY:■ IMF/WB decide $loan/aid condition for poor nations to use only Western science accepted academia/corporate help for Technology, Engineering, R&D(J Perkins+、■ But most importantly, mega investors & funds need to diversity: So using their media to promote new super low cost process superiority or investing in techs that compromise operations they heavily invested in(most existing companies rely on conventional energy/tech to be profitable) is self destructive & non sensical. Hence supporting suppression of or ignoring super low cost tech can be natural, sound, moral, & acceptable business model.

■But free energy tech related drastic disclosure desire has been existing among Western establishment(Lau Rockefeller, Cla Pell, Jo Podesta, Na Maynard, W Colby, Ji Carter, Some European Royalties & Gov’ts[Pie Morin+], Vatican[Co Balducci+] +) & blocked by vocal opposition? And they have been growing in influence with generation change?、■ Also "exaggeration & fabrication"idea of almost running out hydrocarbon resources & man made CO2 exclusive global warming prevention(p205, 216-220) gets cooperation from groups who like to control industries & general population.

109

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Cold fusion tesla scalar wave torsion field free energy over unity really all pseudo science the coming par 7446605

  • shifting dynamics of academia,

  • media vs “Free energy” promoter4

Public & maverick funded full scale mainstream academia “free energy” research projects on LENR is steadily growing(multiple in US, France, Italy, Japan, Russia), Also other fringe research fundraise is allowed quietly(Indiegogo, Fringe NGOs+)

New “raid-seizure proof” strategy from minority aggressive groups?- now some of mostly small “Pseudo-science tech” companies are making affiliated entities, diversifying operations, exec member, clients, backers to multiple nations (eg1 combo of Western Allies & not so friendlies, neutrals)(eg2 Prominent Chinese nationals work as senior scientists in US to engage in disruptive “border line science”)

Mainstream ignored but increasing whistleblowing statements(i.e: Sc Bennett, W Colby, W Casey, J Alsop, C Brandon, Agee, Ulfkotte <-> not Snowden, Assange)& released own US etc intel/gov’t documents(eg FBI Vault+)(Jo Greenewald+), indicate(active in mainstream media till 1980s, then went self censorship?): ■ cont—>>

110

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Cold fusion tesla scalar wave torsion field free energy over unity really all pseudo science the coming par 7446605

  • shifting dynamics of academia,

  • media vs “Free energy” promoter5

--cont—>> Whistleblow docs indicate: 、 ■ Small but Gov’t & Intel dominant factions’ control of Western allies’ top media(news, cinema, documentary, song, music video etc: classified versions of Entertainment Liaison Office) activity in “key areas”, strong involvement in(if not control of) pro sports(Bri Tuohy+), some 3rd world.

US intel's close tie with Wall Street from inception is official data, Many Western Nation's large local gov't admin staff is filled by intel members(Jes Ventura+), US presidents often initially starts career as Intel asset(And Krieg+), Gov’t/Space/Military etc backed by co-operative network of prv contractors & financial group particularly strong tie to US intel(eg PROMIS: M Ruppert, Ptech: Ind Singh+) at “certain level”, to manage ”critical” affairs(D Gibson, Inouye, E Griffin, Stockwell, M Glennon, Bil Moyer+), highest ranking officials could refer it till 1960s: 、 "threat of military-industrial complex" (DD Eisenhower+), "financial-industrial dictatorship controlling Gov't behind the scene" (FD Roosevelt), "so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked we don't dare speak in condemnation"(Woo Wilson),cont—>>

111

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Cold fusion tesla scalar wave torsion field free energy over unity really all pseudo science the coming par 7446605

  • shifting dynamics of academia,

  • media vs “Free energy” promoter6

cont—>> Whistleblow docs indicate: 、 Control includes “junk science R&D”, & science info control as major issue(Hen Stevens, Da Hodges, Ro McRae, Theilmann, Bar Goldwater +) & even pre-informed of major terrorism?(Ma Chesney, Wing-Keung Wong, La Schall, Ri Grove+), or used for classified mental tech?, Non-nationhood interest-seeking cross-border loose alliance(s), or/and Independent entity(ies) in charge?, Breakaway Civilization(s) idea (R Dolan; Schratt, Casbolt, Gr Cameron, Ed Mitchell, Aa Russo, Hellyer, J Marrs+)

■ Some govn't/military top executives complain that they were refused briefing which coverstech/military program,& financial auditing(when money trail disappears) as classified under national/NATO security or even “unacknowledged” Special Access Program(Greer, Da Sheehan[Lawyer, not same as on p116], Hill-Norton, Cl Stone+),cont—>>

112

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Cold fusion tesla scalar wave torsion field free energy over unity really all pseudo science the coming par 7446605

  • shifting dynamics of academia,

  • media vs “Free energy” promoter7

cont—>> Whistleblow docs indicate:■ Through non-straight forward manner,these rare types of claims during 1990s-2008 time frame, including alleged intentional financial & war related mishandling with later no prosecution but seeming promotion, are quietly yet increasingly coming out via some Western alternative media or mainstream non-western in various forms. Theyoften seem to connect to many different group strains-agenda & partial disinfo that complicates data identification, but data base is large enough & still often inter-referenceable in their main content(D Liszt, To Todd, Ji Church,J Rense, Fabregas, Se Stone, Da Whitehead, Bi Ryan, Jo Conrad, V Eastwood, +), More difficult to validate versions: p223-263、

MEDIA STRUCTURE: There is occasionalSCIENCE GAPbetween, A-Typical main Western media, Gov’t, academia & some 3rd world prv media -vs- B-”Pseudoscience” claim positively reporting types often in non Western media, Gov’t, academia; eg reporting LENR validity —>> continue

  • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

113

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Cold fusion tesla scalar wave torsion field free energy over unity really all pseudo science the coming par 7446605

  • shifting dynamics of academia,

  • media vs “Free energy” promoter8

continued—>>MEDIA STRUCTURE: A-Largely uniform in mainstream US, UK, Cda, Aust’lia, Germany, Japan, All of Nordics, Most of W Euro, a few in E Euro(Czech+): ie Western NGO ranked “least corrupt nations”, Wikipedia in ALL languages, large NGOs, Quack Watch etc, a few sci media (Wired, Phys.org+) might report “edge” science positively, Rare & but increasingly frequent gap bet. Academia vs Media, or Media/Govn’t reporting of North America vs W Europe(eg: science info encouraging decentralized efficient energy system benefits, or emphasizing negativity test of GMO or Fluoride water etc )

B-SOME media/Gov’t articles in: certain W & South Euro nations(Austria, Ireland, Italy, France, Portugal, Greece+), Some of E Euro, 20-30% of 3rd World nations, Alternative news in West (Gizmo, Gizmag, WHDT+), Prv media often proWest science treatment, but not state(Venezuela, Brazil, S Africa, Ecuador+), Industry specific & military journal in West、MAJORITY: in ME even including western ally Saudi, 70-80% of 3rd world(Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines+), some E. Euro(Serbia, Hungary, Slovenia, Moldova, Ukraine+), Others(S Korea, Turkey+), India, Non Western NGOs, Most of 3rd world military journals MOST: in *Russia/China/Belarus/Kazakstan/Iran/Cuba/Mongolia+; science/ media’s weaker ties to multinational group compared to own nationalist interests?: —>> continue

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Cold fusion tesla scalar wave torsion field free energy over unity really all pseudo science the coming par 7446605

  • shifting dynamics of academia,

  • media vs “Free energy” promoter9

continued—>>MEDIA STRUCTURE:

*Russia has many pro West oligarchs(tied to Western corporate/NGO/ even Intel[Sco Rickard+], Пятая колонна- 5th Column[Nik Starikov+], but either tend to be more sympathetic to, or profitable/pressured to cooperate with nationalist cause compared to Western peers)& debunkers, who divide the country in “disruptive tech” like super low costTorsion, Psychic healing,or Petrik Carbon Nanotube+ (eg Academy of Science [РАН] vs split offAcademy of Natural Science [РАЕН]), “Committee to Combat Pseudoscience”:(Kruglyakov+) accused of its use to “steal” new tech funding(VA Zhigalov+),

Yet even some prv media(eg LifeNews.ru +), political parties; Liberal Democratic or ruling party United Russia- Еди́ная Росси́я (B Gryzlov+), gov’t & state media tend to support unconventional tech. Similar in China, also notable China-US duel nationality types engage in disruptive tech in US academia

115

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Cold fusion tesla scalar wave torsion field free energy over unity really all pseudo science the coming par 7446605

  • LAWs of THERMO-DYNAMICS:

  • LOTD vs Inventors & “dissident” scientists

  • ■ 1ST LAW: Energy cannot be created or destroyed- only change forms ■ 2ND LAW: Energy always evens out to create a neutral entropy state ■ 1+2: Mainstream interpretation: Must not appear togenerate more energy than it is used; Even some of LENR/Cavitation scientists subscribe to

  • ■ Taboo of questioning even interpretation itself of the law in main academia & in turn media, in rare cases scientists group up to appeal for law reformulation, sometimes they are described as “delusional, crackpots” 、 Inventors & small # of mainstream scientists point out flaw/contradiction in (LOTD)law of Thermodynamics),(Da Sheehan[scientist, not same as on p109], Heyrovská, Sachs, Keefe, PT Pappas, G Pellegrini, X Fu, Nikulov, Graeff, Čápek, L Gordon, Denur, Coffey, Molnar, D’Abramo, Garamella, Tim H Boyer, Allahverdyan, Semura, Crosignani, Kaivarainen, M Devereux, Nieuwenhuizen, Dubonos, Bok, Špička +): 1st law is ok, but 2nd lawonly coversClosed System; It is more of a rule of thumb from statistics; There is no “overunity”- energy is everywhere; Any matter over 0K emits EM wave - thermal radiation anyways; QuantumElectroDynamics etc, —>>continue

116

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Thoughts of inventors dissident scientists on lotd 2

thoughts of Inventors &

“dissident” scientists on LOTD 2

->>continuing: ■Mainstream Closed System: “0 outside” energy, no “perpetual” motion, VS,"Dissident" Open System: unlimited ambient & vacuum energy, earth is permanent mega capacitor, constant sea-air move, earth-moon-star orbit, lightning;

■Law selectively applied:Mainstream's Michelson-Morley, Brillet, Hils+VSmore extensive or unselectiveDissident's Miller, Silvertooth, D Marett, M Grusenick+. Their results are opposite(DeMeo, Allais+),

■ Mainstream tends to conveniently select an interpretation of Sagnac effect etc, why laser-deployed much more accurate interferometer still continues to show “aether”?: Points to existence of “dynamic” aether, radiant energy, self organizing 0pt vacuum, or higgs field with force+,

■ Prevailing idea seems to be based on unproven(disproven)assumptiononly current physical reality exists, orTOTALLY ISOLATEDfrom other realities/vacuum: either case it self-contradicts own closed system idea. Far fetched non-overunity interpretation on: Fluxing vacuum, Inverted Population, Brownian motion, Particle angular momentum, Stars curving-torsion, all perpetual —>>continue

117

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Thoughts of inventors dissident scientists on lotd 3

thoughts of Inventors &

“dissident” scientists ON LOTD 3

->>continuing closed System:OR, need “ReverseLOTD”, to make overall sense of the law: Original Maxwell Equations made sense, but altered by Heaviside, Hertz etc: New version kept transverse wave & dropped “unmeasurable”longitudinal electrical wave & 0 vector vacuumEMpotentials+(Reed, Myr Evans,Trupp, Barrett, Grimes, Crowell, Cohen, Bok, Morris, Jeffers, Jefimenko, Flower, Labounsky, Meszaros, Vigier, Ciubotarju, Lehnert, S Marinov+), EM wave could be created from this potentials, hense itcould be the base of physical reality(Olariu+), & involves “twist” or toroid in the process(Betrami, F Peat+). Indications of financial-industrial group might have staged Heaviside to do so along with rewriting of electrical engineering text books?(Wil Donovan, Da Pond+)

This ignoredwave seems to link zeropoint(ZPE)/free energy extraction: TORSION-Field/SCALAR-Potential; unlimited “information & energy info” carrier that manifests physical effects, BOTHare inter-related:

Torsion theory appeared in 1910s(Cartan), formal experiments & application started in 1960s Soviet(Kozyrev+), Yet 1900s notably in France similar non-locality, biofield/spinfield, & mind effect creation was observed(Luys, Baraduc, Tesla, Radiguet, Ch Ross, Blondlot+), At that time, these effects were explained as related mechanics as dowsing(Bovis, Simoneton, Kervran, Franklin & Maby+). In 1950s UK/US remote non-local radionics was mainstream accepted in same way. Historically most Torsion-Scalar inventions were made via “try & success” result, not pursued based on theory(except in Soviet/Russia after 1980s)

118

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


Contents1

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Contents

End of Part 2: ENTIRE 5 SERIES CAN BE VIEWED IN ONE FILE AT

http://www.slideshare.net/BenRusuisiak/free-energy-pseudo-science-new-nature-paradigm-on-energy-technology-34087356

p119 Scalar “wave”, Standing wave resonance, Torsion field..

p145 Terahertz & Far Infrared waves, “No light” Photo Catalysis, ORMUS..

p168 LENR/Cold Fusion update, Losers & Gainers by its success

p181 Reduced suppressions, energy paradigm smooth transition models

p191 Ramifications if inventor tech becomes mainstream

p223 Already in use? - Zeropoint Energy related "outrageous" claims

p265Summary & Macro level recommendations

  • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada


  • Login