Situational prevention of youth sexual violence and abuse
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

Situational Prevention of Youth Sexual Violence and Abuse PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 143 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Situational Prevention of Youth Sexual Violence and Abuse. Richard Wortley Griffith University Brisbane Australia . Why focus on situations?. All behaviour is a result of person and situation The potential to commit crime is widely distributed in the community

Download Presentation

Situational Prevention of Youth Sexual Violence and Abuse

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Situational prevention of youth sexual violence and abuse

Situational Prevention of Youth Sexual Violence and Abuse

Richard Wortley

Griffith University

Brisbane

Australia


Why focus on situations

Why focus on situations?

  • All behaviour is a result of person and situation

  • The potential to commit crime is widely distributed in the community

  • A great deal of crime is opportunistic

  • Even planned crime is governed by situational factors

  • Crime is not a random event but is patterned by criminogenic environments

  • It is often easier to predict where and whencrime will occur than who will offend

  • Difficult to change offenders but easy to change situations


What is situational crime prevention

What is situational crime prevention?

  • Public health model - primary/secondary prevention

  • Focus on the crime event

    • Proximal versus distal causes

    • Search for crime hotspots

    • Micro-focus – specific crimes in specific locations

    • Creating safe environments rather than safe individuals

  • Two kinds of interventions:

    • Reducing ‘precipitators’

    • Reducing opportunities


What has this got to do with youth sexual violence and abuse

What has this got to do with youth sexual violence and abuse?

  • Traditional person-centred approach

    • View of offenders as suffering psychopathology

      • Internally driven

      • Early onset

      • Persistent

      • Specialised

      • Psychiatric rather than criminal

    • Identifying and screening risky individuals

    • Treating known offenders

  • Smallbone & Wortley (2000)

    • Low incidence of stranger abuse

    • Low levels of entrenched paedophilia

    • Late onset of sexual offending

    • Low persistence of sexual offending

    • High levels of offending versatility


Low incidence of stranger abuse

Low incidence of stranger abuse

  • The myth of ‘stranger danger’

    • 56.5% lived with child

    • 36.9% knew child

    • 6.5% stranger

  • Location

    • 69% at home

    • 7% public locations (e.g. public toilets, parks)

  • Offenders abuse victims who can be conveniently accessed as part of their routine activities


Low levels of entrenched paedophilia

Low levels of entrenched paedophilia

  • Low levels of paedophile networking:

    • 8% talked to other offenders before prison

    • 4% member of paedophile group

  • Low levels of other sexual disorder

    • 5.4% exhibitionism

    • 9% frotteurism

    • 5% voyeurism

    • 4.2% public masturbation

    • 1.2% sexual masochism

  • Low pornography use

    • 10% use child pornography – 1.2% on Internet

  • Offenders do not need to be sexually disordered in order to abuse children


Late onset of sexual offending

Late onset of sexual offending

  • Mean age of first contact 32.4 years

  • Modal age 31-40 years (37% of sample)

  • 10.6% 17-20 years

  • 6% > 50 years

  • Most juvenile offenders do not progress to adult sexual offending

  • However, early onset is associated with higher recidivism

  • Late onset a function of increased opportunities


Low persistence of sexual offending

Low persistence of sexual offending

  • Number of convictions

    • 77% first sex offence

  • Number of victims

    • 55% one victim

    • 3%>10 victims

  • Recidivism

    • Preliminary results <10%

    • Consistent with Hanson & Bussiere’s (1998) meta-analysis - 13% sex offence after 5 years release

  • Offenders deterred by consequences and reduced opportunity


High levels of offending versatility

High levels of offending versatility

  • Prior convictions

    • 57% non-sex offences (all major categories); 23% sex offences

    • Four time more likely first offence was non-sexual (82% versus 18%)

    • 5% serial specialists

  • Reconvictions

    • Sex offenders 3 times more likely to be reconvicted for non-sex offence (Hanson and Bussiere found 37% non-sexual recidivism)

  • Many child sex offenders have generalised impulse-control problems


Explaining youth sexual violence and abuse from a situational perspective

Explaining youth sexual violence and abuse from a situational perspective

  • Potential to commit sexual violence and abuse more widespread than sexual deviancy model suggests

  • Evolutionary predisposition for youthful partners, sexual aggression, and self-interest

  • Failure to learn not to offend

  • Breakdown of personal, social & situational controls – children victimised because they are vulnerable

  • Sexual preference for children may be a consequence of offending – offending changes offenders

  • Importance of onset offence – primary prevention


Three types of offenders

Three types of offenders:

  • Committed

    • 23% serial sex offenders

    • Sexual preference for children

    • Manipulate environment to create opportunities

  • Opportunistic

    • 41% first time sex offenders/versatile criminal history

    • Sexually ambivalent/generalised poor self-control

    • Exploit opportunities

  • Reactive

    • 36% first time for any offence

    • No strong attraction to children/conventional

    • Respond to situational stressors and/or stimulation


Settings for sexual violence and abuse

Settings for sexual violence and abuse:

  • Public

    • Parks, public toilets, swimming pools etc

    • Prevention: Easy to intervene but low base rates

  • Institutional

    • Residential (orphanages, boarding schools, detention centres etc) and day-care (church, scouts, schools etc)

    • Prevention: Easy to intervene but hampered by secrecy, self-protection

  • Domestic

    • Home of victim or offender

    • Prevention: Relatively high base rates but hard to intervene


Suggested prevention strategies public settings

Suggested Prevention Strategies: Public Settings

  • Target hardening

    • Protective behaviours

    • Strengthening guardianship

  • Controlling tools

    • Child pornography controls

  • Utilizing place managers

    • Security staff to recognise grooming

  • Strengthening formal surveillance

    • Surveillance of high-risk locations

    • Surveillance of Internet chat rooms

  • Increasing natural surveillance

    • Design of public toilets

    • Design of playgrounds


Suggested prevention strategies institutional settings

Suggested Prevention Strategies: Institutional Settings

  • Controlling access

    • Visitors to report to office

    • Register of guardians to pick up children

    • Employee screening

  • Strengthening formal surveillance

    • Protocols for dealing with children

    • Regular inspections and reviews

  • Increasing natural surveillance

    • Glass panels in doors of interview rooms

  • Reducing permissibility

    • Humanising ‘total institutions’


Suggested prevention strategies domestic settings

Suggested Prevention Strategies: Domestic Settings

  • Extending guardianship

    • Teaching parents to recognise grooming

    • House rules for visitors

  • Controlling prompts

    • Supervising intimate tasks (bathing etc)

    • Offenders to avoid tempting situations

    • Siblings not sharing beds

    • Single room accommodation

  • Reducing permissibility

    • Alcohol controls

    • Direct challenges (eg via TV)


Implementation issues

Implementation Issues:

  • Displacement?

  • Fuelling a moral panic, siege mentality?

  • Shifting responsibility to victims?

  • Access to premises – need to work through ‘capable guardians’


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Current approaches to sexual violence and abuse based on misconceptions

    • Screening will not identify most potential offenders

    • Treatment/surveillance of known offenders will not prevent new offenders

  • Not all offenders ‘driven’ to offend (at least not initially) – may be deterred by situational interventions before they offend

  • Even committed offenders may be deflected by situational strategies

  • Implementation not always easy - need to avoid ‘siege mentality’


  • Login