1 / 27

Gloria Visconti Senior Expert, Ministry of the Environment, Land and Sea Protection, Italy

2007 Norman E. Borlaug International Symposium “Biofuels and Biofood: The Global Challenges of Emerging Technologies” EU Perspectives Des Moines, October 18, 2007. Gloria Visconti Senior Expert, Ministry of the Environment, Land and Sea Protection, Italy.

nevaeh
Download Presentation

Gloria Visconti Senior Expert, Ministry of the Environment, Land and Sea Protection, Italy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2007 Norman E. Borlaug International Symposium “Biofuels and Biofood: The Global Challenges of Emerging Technologies”EU Perspectives Des Moines, October18, 2007 Gloria Visconti Senior Expert, Ministry of the Environment, Land and Sea Protection, Italy

  2. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change WaterStress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  3. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  4. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  5. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  6. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  7. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  8. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  9. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  10. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  11. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  12. Five megatrends endangering planetary sustainability Climate Change Water Stress 2050? Random Urbanization Energy Demand Socioeconomic Disparity Source: John Schellnhuber, Potsdam Institute, Oxford University, Tyndall Centre

  13. World Primary Energy Demand(Reference Scenario WEO 2006) Other renewables 18 000 Nuclear 16 000 Biomass 14 000 Gas 12 000 10 000 Mtoe Coal 8 000 6 000 4 000 Oil 2 000 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Source: WEO 2006, IEA

  14. Energy-Related CO2 emissions(Reference Scenario WEO 2006) 15 Rest of non-OECD 12 2 China Rest of OECD 9 Gigatonnes of CO 6 United States 3 0 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Source: WEO 2006, IEA

  15. We need to challenge ourselves in order to find concrete and feasible answers • Which Policy Framework will be more effective? • Who should be the main actors? • How to expand the market of low carbon technologies? • What is the timeframe? • What is the current role of US and Europe? And in the long run?

  16. European Union strategy • EU commitment to achieve at least a 20% reduction of GHG by 2020 compared to 1990. It will move to 30%, if other developed countries and advanced developing countries will commit to comparable emission reductions (EU Council, March 2007); • European Council Action Plan (2007 – 2009) “Energy Policy for Europe”: • Internal Market for Gas and Electricity; • Security of Supply; • International Energy Policy; • Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energies; • Energy technologies.

  17. Source: WEO 2005, IEA

  18. EU and biofuels • Biofuels Directive 2003/30 called for 2% of biofuels by 2005 and 5.75 by 2010. • Future: A 10 % binding minimum target for the share of biofuels in overall EU transport petrol and diesel consumption by 2020. To be binding: sustainable production, 2nd generation biofuels commercially available, Fuel Quality Directive (98/70) to be revised.

  19. EU Consumption Target

  20. Production of biofuels in the EU Bioethanol: cereals, limited grown sugar beet Biodiesel: rapeseed

  21. But this is not enough… • Common Agriculture Policy Reform • Rural Reform • Tax reduction • Opportunities for Trade! GSP+, EBA are good instruments but problems persist both for the lack of classification at WTO and the need for a certification scheme.

  22. …not enough and not at any cost! Sustainability! Life cycle analysis, labelling and “certification of origin” of biofuels should be introduced in the global energy market. Labeling and certification should be used to ensure sustainable development, environmental gains, social equity . However, sustainability criteria should not represent a way for the introduction of un-necessary trade barriers and protectionism against developing countries export opportunities. We have to work together!

  23. G8 +5 Gleneagles (July 2005) “We will promote the continued development and commercialisation of renewable energy by: […] d) launching a Global Bioenergy Partnership to support wider, cost effective, biomass and biofuels deployment, particularly in developing countries where biomass use is prevalent” G8 +5 Heiligendamm (June 2007) “We invite the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) to continue its work on biofuel best practices and take forward the successful and sustainable development of bioenergy”

  24. Launch of the GBEP As a concrete fulfilment of the Gleneagles G8 commitment on bioenergy, Italy hosted the formal launch of the Global Bioenergy Partnership during the Ministerial Segment of the Commission for Sustainable Development (CSD14 - New York, 11 May 2006). G8 countries plus China, Mexico, FAO, EUBIA, UN Foundation, UNCTAD, UNEP, UNDP, UNIDO, WB, WEC, IEA joined the Partnership. Italy, together with Mexico, has the Presidency of GBEP for the first two years of activity. The Secretariat is housed at FAO Headquarters in Rome.

  25. Functions of the GBEP 1. Create a global high level policy dialogue on bioenergy, 2.    Favour more efficient and sustainable uses of biomass and develop project activities in the bioenergy field; 3.  Foster the exchange of information; 4.  Facilitate bioenergy integration into energy markets by tackling specific barriers in the supply chain; 5. Act as a cross cutting initiative, working in synergy with other relevant activities, avoiding duplications.

  26. GBEP Key Priorities • Report on Bioenergy Policies, Data and Best Practices • Methodologies for measuring GHGemission reductions from the use of bioenergy • Raising awareness and facilitating information exchange on bioenergy

More Related