1 / 27

Advances in the TAU Performance System

Advances in the TAU Performance System. Allen D. Malony , Sameer Shende {malony,shende}@cs.uoregon.edu Department of Computer and Information Science Computational Science Institute University of Oregon. Outline. Complexity and performance technology Was ist TAU?

Download Presentation

Advances in the TAU Performance System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advances in theTAU Performance System Allen D. Malony, Sameer Shende {malony,shende}@cs.uoregon.edu Department of Computer and Information Science Computational Science Institute University of Oregon

  2. Outline • Complexity and performance technology • Was ist TAU? • Problems currently being investigated • Instrumentation control • Selective Instrumentation • Performance mapping • Callpath profiling • Performance data interaction, and steering • Online performance analysis and visualization • Performance analysis for component software • Concluding remarks

  3. Complexity in Parallel and Distributed Systems • Complexity in computing system architecture • Diverse parallel and distributed system architectures • shared / distributed memory, cluster, hybrid, NOW, Grid, … • Sophisticated processor / memory / network architectures • Complexity in parallel software environment • Diverse parallel programming paradigms • Optimizing compilers and sophisticated runtime systems • Advanced numerical libraries and application frameworks • Hierarchical, multi-level software architectures • Multi-component, coupled simulation models

  4. Complexity Determines Performance Requirements • Performance observability requirements • Multiple levels of software and hardware • Different types and detail of performance data • Alternative performance problem solving methods • Multiple targets of software and system application • Performance technology requirements • Broad scope of performance observation • Flexible and configurable mechanisms • Technology integration and extension • Cross-platform portability • Open, layered, and modular framework architecture

  5. Complexity Challenges for Performance Tools • Computing system environment complexity • Observation integration and optimization • Access, accuracy, and granularity constraints • Diverse/specialized observation capabilities/technology • Restricted modes limit performance problem solving • Sophisticated software development environments • Programming paradigms and performance models • Performance data mapping to software abstractions • Uniformity of performance abstraction across platforms • Rich observation capabilities and flexible configuration • Common performance problem solving methods

  6. General Problems (Performance Technology) How do we create robust and ubiquitous performance technology for the analysis and tuning of parallel and distributed software and systems in the presence of (evolving) complexity challenges? How do we apply performance technology effectively for the variety and diversity of performance problems that arise in the context of complex parallel and distributed computer systems? 

  7. TAU Performance System Framework • Tuning and Analysis Utilities (aka Tools Are Us) • Performance system framework for scalable parallel and distributed high-performance computing • Targets a general complex system computation model • nodes / contexts / threads • Multi-level: system / software / parallelism • Measurement and analysis abstraction • Integrated toolkit for performance instrumentation, measurement, analysis, and visualization • Portable performance profiling/tracing facility • Open software approach

  8. TAU Performance System Architecture Paraver EPILOG

  9. Instrumentation Control • Selection of which performance events to observe • Could depend on scope, type, level of interest • Could depend on instrumentation overhead • How is selection supported in instrumentation system? • No choice • Include / exclude lists (TAU) • Environment variables • Static vs. dynamic • Problem: Controlling instrumentation of small routines • High relative measurement overhead • Significant intrusion and possible perturbation

  10. Rule-Based Overhead Analysis (N. Trebon, UO) • Analyze the performance data to determine events with high (relative) overhead performance measurements • Create a select list for excluding those events • Rule grammar (used in TAUreduce tool) [GroupName:]Field Operator Number • GroupName indicates rule applies to events in group • Field is a event metric attribute (from profile statistics) • numcalls, numsubs, percent, usec, cumusec, totalcount, stdev, usecs/call, counts/call • Operator is one of >, <, or = • Number is any number • Compound rules possible using & between simple rules

  11. TAUReduce Example • tau_reduce implements overhead reduction in TAU • Consider klargest example • Find kth largest element in a N elements • Compare two methods: quicksort, select_kth_largest • i = 2324, N = 1000000 (uninstrumented) • quicksort: (wall clock) = 0.188511 secs • select_kth_largest: (wall clock) = 0.149594 secs • Total: (P3/1.2GHz time) = 0.340u 0.020s 0:00.37 • Execution with all routines instrumented • Execution with rule-based selective instrumentation • usec>1000 & numcalls>400000 & usecs/call<30 & percent>25

  12. Simple sorting example on one processor Before selective instrumentation reduction NODE 0;CONTEXT 0;THREAD 0: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- %Time Exclusive Inclusive #Call #Subrs Inclusive Name msec msec usec/call --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 100.0 13 4,982 1 4 4982030 int main 93.5 3,223 4,659 4.20241E+06 1.40268E+07 1 void quicksort 62.9 0.00481 3,134 5 5 626839 int kth_largest_qs 36.4 137 1,813 28 450057 64769 int select_kth_largest 33.6 150 1,675 449978 449978 4 void sort_5elements 28.8 1,435 1,435 1.02744E+07 0 0 void interchange 0.4 20 20 1 0 20668 void setup 0.0 0.0118 0.0118 49 0 0 int ceil After selective instrumentation reduction NODE 0;CONTEXT 0;THREAD 0: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- %Time Exclusive Inclusive #Call #Subrs Inclusive Name msec total msec usec/call --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 100.0 14 383 1 4 383333 int main 50.9 195 195 5 0 39017 int kth_largest_qs 40.0 153 153 28 79 5478 int select_kth_largest 5.4 20 20 1 0 20611 void setup 0.0 0.02 0.02 49 0 0 int ceil

  13. Performance Mapping • Associate performance with “significant” entities (events) • Source code points are important • Functions, regions, control flow events, user events • Execution process and thread entities are important • Some entities are more abstract, harder to measure • Consider callgraph (callpath) profiling • Measure time (metric) along an edge (path) of callgraph • Incident edge gives parent / child view • Edge sequence (path) gives parent / descendant view • Problem: Callpath profiling when callgraph is unknown • Determine callgraph dynamically at runtime • Map performance measurement to dynamic call path state

  14. 1-Level Callpath Implementation in TAU • TAU maintains a performance event (routine) callstack • Profiled routine (child) looks in callstack for parent • Previous profiled performance event is the parent • A callpath profile structure created first time parent calls • TAU records parent in a callgraph map for child • String representing 1-level callpath used as its key • “a( )=>b( )” : name for time spent in “b” when called by “a” • Map returns pointer to callpath profile structure • 1-level callpath is profiled using this profiling data • Build upon TAU’s performance mapping technology • Measurement is independent of instrumentation

  15. Performance Monitoring and Steering • Desirable to monitor performance during execution • Long-running applications • Steering computations for improved performance • Large-scale parallel applications complicate solutions • More parallel threads of execution producing data • Large amount of performance data (relative) to access • Analysis and visualization more difficult • Problem: Online performance data access and analysis • Incremental profile sampling (based on files) • Integration in computational steering system • Dynamic performance measurement and access

  16. Performance Steering Online Performance Analysis (K. Li, UO) SCIRun (Univ. of Utah) Performance Visualizer Application // performance data streams TAU Performance System Performance Analyzer // performance data output accumulated samples Performance Data Integrator Performance Data Reader file system • sample sequencing • reader synchronization

  17. 2D Field Performance Visualization in SCIRun SCIRun program

  18. Uintah Computational Framework (UCF) • Universityof Utah • UCF analysis • Scheduling • MPI library • Components • 500 processes • Use for onlineand offlinevisualization • Apply SCIRunsteering

  19. Performance Analysis of Component Software • Complexity in scientific problem solving addressed by advances in software development environments and rich layered software middleware and libraries • Increases complexity in performance problem solving • Integration barriers for performance technology • Incompatible with advanced software technology • Inconsistent with software engineering process • Problem: Performance engineering for component systems • Respect software development methodology • Leverage software implementation technology • Look for opportunities for synergy and optimization

  20. Focus on Component Technology and CCA • Emerging component technology for HPC and Grid • Component: software object embedding functionality • Component architecture (CA): how components connect • Component framework: implements a CA • Common Component Architecture (CCA) • Standard foundation for scientific component architecture • Component descriptions • Scientific Interface Description Language (SIDL) • CCA ports for component interactions (provides and uses) • CCA services: directory, registery, connection, event • High-performance components and interactions

  21. Extended Component Design • POC and PKC are compliant with component architecture • Component composition performance engineering • Utilize technology and services of component framework genericcomponent

  22. Ports Performance Component Timer Event Query Knowledge Architecture of a Performance Component • Each component advertises its services • Performance component: • Timer (start/stop) • Event (trigger) • Query (timers…) • Knowledge (component performance model) • Prototype implementation of timer • CCAFFEINE reference framework • http://www.cca-forum.org/café.html • SIDL • Instantiate with TAU functionality

  23. TimerPort Interface Declaration in CCAFEINE • Create Timer port abstraction namespace performance{ namespace ccaports{ /** * This abstract class declares the Timer interface. * Inherit from this class to provide functionality. */ class Timer: /* implementation of port */ public virtual gov::cca::Port { /* inherits from port spec */ public: virtual ~ Timer (){ } /** * Start the Timer. Implement this function in * a derived class to provide required functionality. */ virtual void start(void) = 0; /* virtual methods with */ virtual void stop(void) = 0; /* null implementations */ ... }

  24. Using Performance Component Timer • Component uses framework services to get TimerPort • Use of this TimerPort interface is independent of TAU // Get Timer port from CCA framework services form CCAFFEINE port = frameworkServices->getPort ("TimerPort"); if (port) timer_m = dynamic_cast < performance::ccaports::Timer * >(port); if (timer_m == 0) { cerr << "Connected to something, not a Timer port" << endl; return -1; } string s = "IntegrateTimer"; // give name for timer timer_m->setName(s); // assign name to timer timer_m->start(); // start timer (independent of tool) for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { double x = random_m->getRandomNumber (); sum = sum + function_m->evaluate (x); } timer_m->stop(); // stop timer

  25. Using TAU Component in CCAFEINE repository get TauTimer /* get TAU component from repository */ repository get Driver /* get application components */ repository get MidpointIntegrator repository get MonteCarloIntegrator repository get RandomGenerator repository get LinearFunction repository get NonlinearFunction repository get PiFunction create LinearFunction lin_func /* create component instances */ create NonlinearFunction nonlin_func create PiFunction pi_func create MonteCarloIntegrator mc_integrator create RandomGenerator rand create TauTimer tau /* create TAU component instance */ /* connecting components and running */ connect mc_integrator RandomGeneratorPort rand RandomGeneratorPort connect mc_integrator FunctionPort nonlin_func FunctionPort connect mc_integrator TimerPort tau TimerPort create Driver driver connect driver IntegratorPort mc_integrator IntegratorPort go driver Go quit

  26. Concluding Remarks • Complex software and parallel computing systems pose challenging performance analysis problems that require robust methodologies and tools • To build more sophisticated performance tools, existing proven performance technology must be utilized • Performance tools must be integrated with software and systems models and technology • Performance engineered software • Function consistently and coherently in software and system environments • TAU performance system offers robust performance technology that can be broadly integrated

More Related