1 / 18

Counterterrorism

Counterterrorism. PO 483: The Politics of Terrorism. Counterterrorism: Introduction. Large advantage in relative capabilities doesn’t necessarily translate into direct advantage Constrained by principles of legitimacy and proportionality

neorah
Download Presentation

Counterterrorism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Counterterrorism PO 483: The Politics of Terrorism

  2. Counterterrorism: Introduction • Large advantage in relative capabilities doesn’t necessarily translate into direct advantage • Constrained by principles of legitimacy and proportionality • Focus specifically on difficulty of counterterrorism by democratic states • Domestic constraints • Democratic principles • Tradeoff between effective surveillance/combat and conservation of civil liberties • International Constraints

  3. Counterterrorism: Introduction • General Concerns • Collection, analysis and dissemination • Use of military/police • Legislative responses

  4. General Counterterrorist Strategy • Continuum of Strategies: Compromising <------------> Intolerant • Acceptability of measures to various audiences must be counterbalanced with potential success and effectiveness

  5. General Counterterrorist Strategy • Either extreme is dangerous to democratic counterterrorist efforts • Compromising: Maintains strict association with acceptability, but undermines successful defense of SQ • Intolerant: Staunch defense of SQ, but little acceptability • Parallel to psychological theories of IR: deterrence vs. downward spiral

  6. General Counterterrorist Strategy • Best choice: Somewhere in middle; evidence indicates that negotiation can be used without concession • Alternatives (Bobrow): • Contingent Concession • Ransom with Entrapment • Ransom with Eventual Retribution

  7. Counterterrorism: The Intelligence Function • Wardlaw’s Suggestion • Develop highly intrusive technologies as preemptive tools (surveillance, monitoring)

  8. Counterterrorism: The Intelligence Function • Prevention • Network for collection, analysis, dissemination of info on extremists (potential terrorists) • Direction • Data collection requirements • Productivity checks • Produces systematic and effective organization AND provides legitimacy (no ad hoc measures) • Collection – identify groups, keep tabs • Infiltration • Monitor procurement • Intimidation/payoffs

  9. Counterterrorism: The Intelligence Function • Analysis • Threat validity • Group and individual psychological profiling • Targeting/protection • Propaganda analysis • Redirection of potential joiners • Importance of generality • Dissemination • Effective and efficient • Information sharing • Important Issues • Application of civil liberties • The paradox of successful intelligence

  10. Counterterrorism: The Military Function • Wardlaw’s Suggestions: • Creation of special ops forces to deal specifically with terrorist situations • Increase size of security forces; increased procedural and physical security • Develop alternatives to hostage negotiation that are not predicated upon intolerance

  11. Counterterrorism: The Military Function • Combating terrorism (intelligence failure) • Use of military to counter domestic terrorism in democratic states fraught with problems • Clash of military/democratic ethics • Supercedes existing criminal justice system; issues of rule of law • Can encourage societal polarization • Detracts from external security • Still, tradeoff sometimes necessary • Potential solution: use of important military expertise within existing legal approach

  12. Counterterrorism: The Military Function • The use of the military to combat international terrorism • Pros: • Fewer civil liberties issues • Retribution answers demands for tough action • Cost imposition = deterrent • Cost imposition = internal dissension • Cons: • International Intelligence much more difficult to accomplish • Provocation of wider conflict • Collateral damage and the loss of the “moral high ground” • Strain alliances • Can create impossible benchmark for future success

  13. Counterterrorism: Domestic Institutional Responses • Wardlaw’s Suggestions: • Capital punishment • Long-term solutions (address inequities) • Increase security force powers • Legal limitation of media’s capacity to report terrorist acts • Special anti-terrorist legislation (extra-legal measures) • Legislation limiting rights of assembly; ID cards and registration • Signatory to international treaties (extradition, suspension of services) • Recognition of terrorist groups as political entities

  14. Counterterrorism: Domestic Institutional Responses • Effectiveness necessary for intelligence/combat, but tradeoff inherent • Alter fundamental citizen-government relationship • Need support of majority in majoritarian government • Lack of support destroys legitimacy, sets dangerous precedent • History of difficulty in relinquishing powers once taken

  15. Legislative Responses - General • Legislation allowing for electronic eavesdropping, curtailment of freedoms of assembly, anti-government speech, due process • Can give terrorists “what they want” • Why no legislative responses in US before 9/11? Illegitimate to majority of populace

  16. Legislative Responses – Specific West Germany (1970s): • Exercise of executive power w/o parliamentary approval • Judging of terrorists by legislature • Termination/denial of employment based on disloyalty (“legal but questionable” activity) • Suppression of anti-gov’t opinions • Greater prison sentences • Relaxed criteria for detention and searches • Problem: Overt harshness (unpopular with majority) based on ad hoc reaction

  17. Legislative Responses – Specific Great Britain (1970s): • Many of same types of laws (no pro-IRA demonstrations, detention without arraignment, security checks) But: • Part of an existent anti-terror scheme • Not unprecedented • Not as harsh • Subject to relatively strict governmental review • Different histories • Led to popular acceptance of legislation allowing for more effective counterterrorist policies

  18. Legislative Responses – Specific USA PATRIOT ACT: • Section 802: Expanding the type of violence and activity that is considered political terrorism • Section 216: Tracking Internet Usage • Section 218: Amends government wiretap and physical search capability • Section 411: Expands class of immigrants subject to removal (profiling) • Section 412: Detention of Immigrants at AG’s decree

More Related