1 / 16

e-Voting Status Quo Germany

e-Voting Status Quo Germany. Open Rights Group: Taking the lid off e-Voting London, 08/02/2007 Ulrich Wiesner. Germany: Voting Computers. Permitted since 1999 Only certified vendor is Nedap Sold 600 computers to City of Cologne in 1998

nen
Download Presentation

e-Voting Status Quo Germany

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. e-VotingStatus Quo Germany Open Rights Group: Taking the lid off e-Voting London, 08/02/2007 Ulrich Wiesner

  2. Germany: Voting Computers • Permitted since 1999 • Only certified vendor is Nedap • Sold 600 computers to City of Cologne in 1998 • Other cities joined since then: Dortmund, Neuss, Cottbus, Koblenz • Covering 2’000 of 80’000 ballot offices • Hamburg decided to introduce Digital Pen in 10/2005 • Based on Anoto Technology • Prototype tested in 2005 • Vendor selected in 01/2007(Windows based system) • IBM Germany announced to develop a roll-in/roll-out offering (embedded Linux and Java) • Adds 1600 ballot offices at once Circle size represents number of ballot offices using computers

  3. 2D dot pattern, 90 dpi Dots are offset in 4 directions (up, down, left, right) Pattern of 6x6 dots provide coordinates for pen, Addresses* 436 squares of 2x2mm2 e.g. 20’000x20’000 km2 *)Anoto refers to 60M km2 Digital Pen

  4. Digital Pen • Pen with embedded scanner • Paper contains dot pattern acting as a 2D bar code • Pen recognises coordinates where it writes • Electronic representation of marked areas is uploaded to computer and joined with electronic voting form • Paper ballot is put in ballot box • At end of election: • Computer classifies electronic votes • Ambiguously marked scans are presented to officials • Classified votes are counted by computer • Inherent paper trail • Kick-starts the re-count discussion • Is it acceptable to only count a random sample? • Which sample size is required? • How does a recount needs to be organised? • Hamburg plans to count paper ballots in 1.5% of the ballot offices. No recounts after first election.

  5. Germany: e-Counting • Manual capture of paper ballots • Barcode scanner (code next to chosen option on ballot paper) • PC based entering via keyboard • 4 eye principle • Used in local elections only • Lacking appropriate legal basis • No certification process • Southern Germany • Baden-Würtemberg, Bayern, Hessen

  6. Germany: Opposition • Little media coverage other than modernisation euphoria • But detailled and frequent reports by Richard Sietmann in major computer magazine (c’t) • Other media picking up since Q4/2006 • Election scrutiny • 2005 Bundestag election challenged because of use of Nedaps • Violating election principles transparency and audit-ability • Turned down in December 2006 • Next step is constitutional court • 2006 Cottbus major election challenged • Turned down immediately • 2006 On-line petition against voting computers • Filed by Tobias Hahn, Berlin, Signed by 45’000+ people • Pending with petition committee of the Bundestag • Chaos Computer Club, Berlin • Involved in Nedap-Hack • Active campaign supporting petition and scrutiny

  7. Issues / To does • No national campaign • Do we need one? Should it be European or national? • Can existing organisations pick up? • How can we maintain non-partisan character of the issue? • Digital pen adds new quality • Technology requires research • Security needs to be analysed • Paper trail verification issues need to be understood • Available knowledge on recounts need to be applied to German electoral system • Lack of awareness • Many Politicians and Journalists still unaware of e-Voting and related issues • Vendors still gets away with aim to provide the modern approach to elections • Discussion needs to leave the IT corner • Efficiency of electoral systems? • Does participation require more complex electoral systems and more frequent polls? • Might/will drive purchase of e-Voting technology

  8. Questions and Answers http://ulrichwiesner.de

  9. Germany: Election Organisation • Election Organisation • National Electoral Act and Electoral Code provide framework • National elections are supervised by Ministry of Interior • Execution is with municipalities • Costs are refunded to municipalities by a lump sum per voter • Use of technology • Ministry of Interior is regulator (authorisation) • Municipalities are free in decision if and what to use within regulatory framework • Voter registration • Law enforces that citizens register their residence with the municipality • Voter register is prepared by municipality from residence register • No requirement for voters to enrol in register • No central registers for residence or voters on federal or state level • Process is relatively incident free

  10. Germany: Electoral System • National Parliament • 2 votes: One for regional candidate, one for party in federal state • Parliaments of Federal States • Typically 2 votes (candidate and party) or just one vote (party) • Regional Elections • County, Municipality, (Major) • System varies from state to state • Often similar systems to national level • Some states have complex electoral systems • E.g. Frankfurt: One vote for each seat (85) in the Council • Absentee voting • Via mail on request

  11. Germany: Remote e-voting • Late 1990‘s • Significant effort in research, projects W.I.E.N, VoteRemote • 05/2002: • Minister of the Interior announces remote e-Voting for 2006 or 2010 • 10/2002 • Parliament discusses remote e-Voting: supported by all 5 parties • Perception that Germany is “behind” • New channel in addition to ballot office and mail • Hope that higher turnout can be achieved using internet voting • Debate is focussed on if internet voting should be used to vote more often (supported by Labour and Greens, opposed by Conservatives) • Since 2004 • Ministry of Interior considers internet voting to be appropriate for non-political elections only • Main concern is that secrecy of the vote can not be enforced

  12. Black box voting Hypothesis: • Every electronic voting system violates at least one of the three procedural election principles: Secrecy, Transparency, Verifiability • Every electronic voting system requires trust into vendor and operators • Trust is inappropriate measure to ensure election integrity Secret? Transparent? Verifiable?

  13. Election Principles • Verifiability, transparency and secrecy ensure that elections are free, fair and general

  14. 2005 Election Scrutiny • Bundestag election, September 19th, 2005 • Four e-Voting related complaints filed with scrutiny committee of the parliament • Federal Ministry of the Interior replied in May 2006: • No evidence of tampering, threads are hypothetical” • Elections are still transparent and verifiable using Nedaps • Nedaps can not be hacked because source code is private • Manipulation is pointless because Nedaps are configured just before election and hackers can’t know which party is on which button • Election integrity is ensured by procedural framework • Bundestag rejected complaints on December 14th, 2006 • Mainly follows arguments of Ministry of the Interior • Next step is Constitutional Court • To be filed by 14/02/2007

  15. Legal framework • Transparency and verifiability is substantial part of legal framework, but not repeated in context of e-Voting

  16. Upcoming Elections • Germany • No major computer based elections in 2007 • Spring 2008 – Hessen and Nordrhein-Westfalen (Nedap) • Spring 2008 – Hamburg (Digital Pen) • Spring 2009 – European Parliament (Digital Pen?, Nedap) • Autum 2009 – Bundestag (Digital Pen?, Nedap)

More Related