1 / 8

Partnership context – JAR

Making Data Count: Making effective use of health data in Children’s Services Stockton on Tees Borough Council 12 November 2008. Partnership context – JAR. The overall level of partnership working is impressive

nellis
Download Presentation

Partnership context – JAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Making Data Count:Making effective use of health data in Children’s ServicesStockton on Tees Borough Council12 November 2008

  2. Partnership context – JAR • The overall level of partnership working is impressive • The way in which key jointly funded management posts carry dual responsibility within the council and the PCT, and associated extensive joint commissioning arrangements, is a notable feature in Stockton-on-Tees. • Ambitious plans for integrated area-based provision are being implemented.

  3. Integrated Service Areas Integrated Service Area Team: • Social Care staff • Youth Service staff • Children’s Centres • Health Visitors • School Nurses • Community Midwifery

  4. Context • Co terminus PCT • Joint commissioning arrangements in place • Joint funded Heads of Services across operations and commissioning between LA and PCT • Close linkages between LA planning and AOP • Community Services managed by Acute Trust • MH & LD services delivered through Foundation Trust

  5. What we share • Close working in establishing common targets between LAA & Vital Signs. • Agreed sharing of performance against these targets (informal at this stage) • Project based information sharing of non identifiable client data (e.g. Pathways development, Teenage Conceptions). • Focused cohort analysis (but…sharing of client level data).

  6. Why we share • To facilitate planning and support work of the Children’s Trust Board. • To meet statutory requirements • To provide effective challenge to service providers in both statutory and voluntary sector (but….cross organisational challenge). • Identify trends. • Continue to drive data quality (but….common understanding between organisations). • To understand what is happening at locality level – information into intelligence

  7. How we share • Through joint management structures • Informal networks and relationships • Protocols? • Access to MIDAS / SystmOne / PARIS • Breakdown organisational language and TLAs • Present data which is meaningful. • Deliver at an agreed frequency (timings do not always tally)

  8. Some specific examples… Going well: • Teenage Conception sharing, FTE analysis, ISA health activity monitoring and review. Work in Progress: • ISA work with Acute Trust (A&E), Analysis of Community Matron & District Nursing activity. More challenging: • Regular data sharing with Acute Trust and Foundation MH Trust, client level data analysis.

More Related