1 / 15

SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE OF ESTABLISHED AND EMERGING IP BUSINESS MODELS:

SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE OF ESTABLISHED AND EMERGING IP BUSINESS MODELS:. ___________. Ron Laurie Managing Director Inflexion Point Strategy, LLC Palo Alto, CA www.ip-strategy.com. ___________. Patent Engineering Class - Dr. Tal Lavian Center for Entrepreneurship and Technology

nell-banks
Download Presentation

SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE OF ESTABLISHED AND EMERGING IP BUSINESS MODELS:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE OFESTABLISHED AND EMERGING IP BUSINESS MODELS: ___________ Ron Laurie Managing Director Inflexion Point Strategy, LLC Palo Alto, CA www.ip-strategy.com ___________ Patent Engineering Class - Dr. Tal Lavian Center for Entrepreneurship and Technology UC-Berkeley College of Engineering March 9, 2009

  2. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Overview • Market Makers & Transaction Intermediaries • Enforcers and Litigation Financiers • Institutional Aggregators/Investors • IP Product Companies • Analytics Toolmakers & Service Providers

  3. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Overview • Market Makers & Transaction Intermediaries • Enforcers and Litigation Financiers • Institutional Aggregators/Investors • IP Product Companies • Analytics Toolmakers & Service Providers

  4. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Market Makers & Transaction Intermediaries • Licensing Specialists • Corporate Licensing Spin-Outs (e.g., AT&T KV, BIPCO, Philips IPS) • University Tech Transfer Agents (e.g., Univ. TLO’s, BTG, UTEK, Texelerate) • Independent Licensing Agents (e.g., General Patent, IPAC, IP Finance, IP Value, Lava Group, ThinkFire) • On-line Exchanges/Bulletin Boards (e.g., InnoCentive, IP Exchange Intl. (OT), NineSigma, Open IP.org, Patent Bid-Ask (OT), The Dean’s List (OT), Tynax, Yet2.com, Virtual Ventures) • Brokers(e.g., Bramson, Fairfield, Iceberg, Inflexion Point, IPB AG, ICAP, IPEG BV, iPotential, PatentBridge, PCT Capital, Pluritas, Semi. Insights, Sherwood) Note: some ILAs and Exchanges have expanded their services to include brokerage (e.g., IP Value, Lava, ThinkFire, Yet2.com)

  5. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Market Makers & Transaction Intermediaries(cont.) • IP Auction Houses (e.g., Ocean Tomo, IPA GmbH, IPAuctions.com) • IP-Driven M&A Advisors (e.g., Inflexion Point, Ocean Tomo, PCT Capital, Pluritas) • IP-Backed Finance • Royalty Stream Securitization (e.g., AllseT IP, UCC Capital, Royalty Pharma) • IP-Collateralized Lending (ABL) (e.g., OT/Perot, Paradox)

  6. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Overview • Market Makers & Transaction Intermediaries • Enforcers and Litigation Financiers • Institutional Aggregators/Investors • IP Product Companies • Analytics Toolmakers & Service Providers

  7. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Enforcers & Litigation Financiers • Single Inventor Assertion Firms e.g., NTP,RAKL (Ron Katz), Lelmelson Foundation, LPL, Patriot/TPL, Fergason • Patent Licensing & Enforcement Companies (PLECs) e.g., Acacia, IPCom (Germany), Plutus, C2-GTI, TechSearch/Niro, (Refac) Note: there is some overlap between this category and the Institutional Aggregators and Licensing Agents. • Litigation Financiers/Investors e.g., Altitude, Rembrandt, NW Patent Funding (Canada), Juridica (UK), Oasis Note: models include equity investment, debt financing, and buy-out.

  8. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Overview • Market Makers & Transaction Intermediaries • Enforcers and Litigation Financiers • Institutional Aggregators/Investors • IP Product Companies • Analytics Toolmakers & Service Providers

  9. Established IP Business Models -Institutional Aggregators and Investors Institutional Patent Aggregators • Strategic (i.e., Corporate) Investors Intellectual Ventures (US) • Financial Investors Coller Capital (UK)

  10. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Overview • Market Makers & Transaction Intermediaries • Enforcers and Litigation Financiers • Institutional Aggregators/Investors • IP Product Companies • Analytics Toolmakers & Service Providers

  11. Established IP Business Models -IP “Product” Companies • IP/Technology Development Companies AmberWave ARM InterDigital MIPS Mosaid Qualcomm (?) Rambus Tessera WiLan etc. Note: these companies may utilize a revenue model based on - Technology transfer (design info, process know-how, and consulting) - Patent enforcement, or - Both

  12. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Overview • Market Makers & Transaction Intermediaries • Enforcers and Litigation Financiers • Institutional Aggregators/Investors • IP Product Companies • Analytics Toolmakers & Service Providers

  13. ESTABLISHED IP BUSINESS MODELS -Analytics: Toolmakers & Service Providers • Patent Rating Services and IP Analysis Software Anaqua 1790 Analytics IP Checkups Intellectual Assets Innovation International Patent Ratings (Ocean Tomo) Patent Cafe TAEUS The Patent Board TOPCAP • Valuation Specialists Consor CRA Intl (Intecap) Hagelin ICMG LECG NERA

  14. EMERGING IP BUSINESS MODELS • IP-Based Corporate Spin-Outs e.g., Analytic Capital, Blueprint Ventures, IgniteIP, Inflexion Point, IP Group plc, New Venture Partners • Patent-Based Public Stock Indexes e.g., OT 300 Index, Patent Board WSJ Scorecard • Defensive Patent Pools, Funds and Alliances e.g., Allied Security Trust, Constellation Capital, Open Invention Network, RPX • IP Transaction Best Practices Development Communities e.g., Gathering2.0, Patent Freedom, Natl. IP Mgmt. Taskforce (Note: some overlap here with on-line exchanges/bulletin boards)

  15. EMERGING IP BUSINESS MODELS The BIG Question -- What effect (if any) will the changing legal environment have on the various IP business models, individually and collectively? • Patent reform initiatives in Congress (e.g., damages apportionment) • Supreme Court cases (e.g., eBay, KSR, Medimmune, LG/Quanta) • New PTO examination rules - claim limitations, IDS, continuation practice, obviousness guidelines, etc.

More Related