1 / 5

The Makaw Strategy: Structuring a Controversial Issue Discussion

Civics Education. The Makaw Strategy: Structuring a Controversial Issue Discussion. Dealing with Controversial Issues. During a Discussion of a Controversial Issue. Am I listening to what other people are saying or am I missing important points?

neith
Download Presentation

The Makaw Strategy: Structuring a Controversial Issue Discussion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Civics Education The Makaw Strategy: Structuring a Controversial Issue Discussion

  2. Dealing with Controversial Issues

  3. During a Discussion of a Controversial Issue • Am I listening to what other people are saying or am I missing important points? • Am I making claims clearly and supporting them with facts? • Am I critiquting ideas not individuals and being respectful of other’s viewpoints? • Am I helping to develop a shared understanding of the problem or issue

  4. During a Discussion of a Controversial Issue • Provide an overview of the controversy: pro and con • Assign students to position: In twos discuss reasons of support • Students take position and present argument after perception check • Write a dialogic essay reflecting on the controversy

  5. 5 Conditions for Ideal Deliberation • Students are engaged in integrated decision-making discussions that involve genuine value conflicts that arise out of relating to one another at school • Discussion group is diverse enough that students have the benefit of reasoning and social perspectives different from their own. • The discussion group is free of domination -- gross or subtle • The discussion leader is skilled at comprehending and presenting reasoning and perspectives that are missing, countering conventional ideas with critical thinking , and advocating position that are inarticulate or being drummed out of consideration • Discussions are dialogic Source: Parker, Walter (2005). Teaching against idiocy. Phi Delta Kappan.January

More Related