Indonesian oral proficiency guidelines
Download
1 / 21

Indonesian Oral Proficiency Guidelines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 122 Views
  • Uploaded on

Indonesian Oral Proficiency Guidelines. Ellen Rafferty, Juliana Wijaya, Erlin Barnard COTSEAL/SEASSI 20 th Annual Conference July 16 – 17, 2010 University of Wisconsin – Madison. Southeast Asian Languages Oral Exams:. Assessing What? Achievement (exit) or Proficiency? Assessing Who?

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Indonesian Oral Proficiency Guidelines' - nedra


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Indonesian oral proficiency guidelines

Indonesian Oral Proficiency Guidelines

Ellen Rafferty, Juliana Wijaya, Erlin Barnard

COTSEAL/SEASSI 20th Annual Conference

July 16 – 17, 2010

University of Wisconsin – Madison


Southeast asian languages oral exams
Southeast Asian Languages Oral Exams:

  • Assessing What?

    Achievement (exit) or Proficiency?

  • Assessing Who?

  • For What Purposes?

  • Placement and Achievement Tests:

    university-based (designed and produced locally)

    program-based (in the US: SEASSI, FLAS)

    in SEA: Advanced SEA Language Study Abroad (COTIM,

    VASI, AFAP, ASK, AST)

  • National Standard Tests:

    Measuring proficiency by ACTFL or ILR scales


Problematizing standards actfl and ilr guidelines
Problematizing Standards:ACTFL and ILR guidelines

  • ACTFL and ILR scales: Linear progressions

    vs Speakers’ non linear progressions

    (e.g. heritage language speakers)

  • Eurocentric

  • script disjunction

  • tasks: simple descriptive language may be easier/harder in one language than the other

  • context and content

  • registers, speech acts


Proficiency referenced scales

ILR

0 (No Proficiency)

0+ (Memorized Proficiency)

1 (Elementary Proficiency)

1+ (Elementary Proficiency, Plus)

2 (Limited Working Proficiency)

2+ (Limited Working Proficiency, Plus)

3 (General Professional Proficiency)

3+ (General Professional Proficiency, Plus)

4 (Advanced Professional Proficiency)

4+ (Advanced Professional Proficiency, Plus)

5 (Functionally Native Proficiency)

ACTFL

Novice:

Low, Mid, High

Intermediate:

Low, Mid, High

Advanced:

Low, Mid, High

Superior

Proficiency-referenced Scales


Seassipe southeast asian summer studies institute proficiency examinations
SEASSIPE: Southeast Asian Summer Studies Institute Proficiency Examinations

  • Developed by Brown, Ramos, Cook, Lockhart (UH-Manoa) 1988-99

  • User’s Manual published in 1991

  • Reports on the design, administration, revision and validation of SEASSI Proficiency Examinations

  • Goal: to develop overall language proficiency examinations in: Indonesian, Khmer, Tagalog, Thai and Vietnamese

  • Objective: to assess the grammatical and communicative abilities of students studying these languages in order to gage their overall language proficiency

  • Paradigm: ACTFL guidelines: novice-advanced plus (speaking)


Seassipe oral exam format
SEASSIPE: Oral Exam Format Proficiency Examinations

Students’ responses to the interviewers’ questions are measured by:

  • Meaning: Interviewer’s general meaning was understood and interviewer followed the student’s answer.

  • Fluency: The student answered quickly and with few pauses and hesitations

  • Accuracy: Very few grammatical errors


Thai oral proficiency exam chulalongkorn university uh manoa
Thai Oral Proficiency Exam: Proficiency ExaminationsChulalongkorn University – UH Manoa

  • Speaking test formats:

    Communicative

    Report

    Interview

  • What guidelines?

    Rubrics are similar to ACTFL

  • Purpose?

    Exit, proficiency, placement, certification


Indonesian oral proficiency guidelines cotim
Indonesian Oral Proficiency Guidelines (COTIM): Proficiency Examinations

  • developing national standards for Indonesian oral proficiency levels

  • defining linguistic features associated with levels based on a set of sample interviews collected from seven different Indonesian language programs across the US (bottom up approach)

  • Test format integrates 3 communicative modes: Interpersonal, Interpretive, Presentational communicative skills

  • ACTFL scales adapted: novice low - superior


Test format rubric 1 novice high intermediate mid
Test Format: (Rubric 1): Proficiency ExaminationsNovice High – Intermediate Mid

  • to obtain language samples from students and thus to demonstrate proficiency levels from the novice-high to intermediate-mid levels.

  • The oral interview consists of two parts:

    1)a student presentation based on an illustration (The presentation can be a concrete description of the contents of the illustration or an interpretation of what is going on with evaluative comments creating a story), followed up by questions about the illustration to determine the student’s ability to express him/herself.

    2) a conversation lead by the interviewer (to push to a higher level: the interviewer will request the student to describe and narrate in paragraph level format discussing high frequency concrete topics such as school, work, education, current events, social issues, comparisons).


Rubric 2 intermediate high and above
(Rubric 2): Intermediate High and Above Proficiency Examinations

  • to obtain language samples from students and thus to demonstrate proficiency levels from the intermediate-high through superior levels.

  • The oral interview consists of two parts:

    1) a student presentation based on a reading. (The presentation should begin with a description/summary of the contents of the article and end with supported opinion about the topic), followed up by questions about the content of the article checking comprehension and pushing the student to achieve the highest level of proficiency obtainable.

    2) a conversation lead by the interviewer about a variety of topics (e.g. freedom of expression, human trafficking, etc.) to elicit a language sample that evidences a wide range of vocabulary and different registers. The objective is to push the student to his/her highest skill level.


Indonesian oral proficiency descriptors
Indonesian Oral Proficiency Descriptors: Proficiency Examinations

  • Global tasks/Functions

  • Context

  • Content/Topics

  • Accuracy

  • Text type


Novice mid
Novice Mid: Proficiency Examinations

  • speak in discrete words and phrases.

  • produce mostly memorized utterances.

  • The context is very predictable and limited to self and immediate surroundings, dealing with common discrete elements of daily life.

  • respond to direct questions with limited words, and they need frequent prompting from the interlocutor.

  • They are highly reactive.

  • Long pauses are frequent, with frequent hesitation, lack of vocabulary and inaccuracy (pronunciation, grammar, structure, diction, use of question words in answers).

  • They are understood with difficulty by sympathetic interlocutors familiar with non-native speakers.


Novice high
Novice High: Proficiency Examinations

  • can convey information related to self and immediate environment (study and kinship, places, preferences) but producing mostly formulaic and memorized phrases.

  • can respond to simple and direct questions

  • tend to repeat and rephrase and clarify the interlocutor’s utterances in their response.

  • use simple sentences although they often still use incomplete sentences and in phrases (resort to 1st language when tasks are incomplete)

  • inaccurate pronunciation influenced by his/her First Language, but can still be understood by sympathetic interlocutors accustomed to non-native speakers

  • Errors are frequent, for example word order, use of negation, omissions of prepositions, affixation, and deletion of verbs

  • are understood with difficulty by sympathetic interlocutors familiar with non-native speakers.


Intermediate low
Intermediate Low: Proficiency Examinations

  • communicate some basic ideas, although with difficulty; using simple sentences with many long pauses, searching for words.

  • demonstrate limited ability to create with the language to convey basic, limited personal message.

  • responses are typically reactive, indicating inability to initiate conversations. Topics include self, family, friends, places, likes and dislikes.

  • pronunciation is influenced by 1st language (English), understood only by sympathetic interlocutor.

  • patterned errors are evident, such as word order preposition, deletion of ‘ada’ in negative, prepositional phrase.


Intermediate mid
Intermediate Mid: Proficiency Examinations

  • demonstrate ability to create with the language both combining and recombining learned materials.

  • speak in strings of sentences.

  • can talk about concrete topics, such as self, family, occupation, travel, school, and leisure activities

  • can communicate uncomplicated idea:

    personal experience, future plans, simple comparisons

  • utilize time and sequence marker, use simple connectors, more frequent use of affixation

  • common patterned errors include passive voice, frequent inaccurate word choice.

  • when hesitate, revert to their first language.


Intermediate high
Intermediate High: Proficiency Examinations

  • demonstrate emerging ability to describe and narrate.

  • show emerging paragraph, but mostly operate in strings of sentences.

  • incorporate some communicative strategies such as asking for clarification, repair (self correct to more formal expressions/forms).

  • can make more complete comparisons.

  • utilize more variety of connectors.

  • occasional lapses into informal forms & pronunciation, while formal forms are called for.

  • venture to use more complex patterns, such as more varied use of affixes and passive voice.


Advanced
Advanced: Proficiency Examinations

  • can narrate different time frames (past, present and future).

  • can describe with greater details and a wide range of word choices.

  • full conversational partner, functioning in informal and formal settings, but mostly formal settings.

  • concrete topics of personal and public interest e.g. education, economy, environment, social issues and current events.

  • can use complex sentences and morphology involving accurate of passive and active sentences, subordinate clauses, nominalization

  • can self correct and be understood without difficulty by speakers unaccustomed to non-native speakers

  • connected discourse with adequate cohesive devices


Advanced high
Advanced High: Proficiency Examinations

  • can state and fully support opinion and explain in details in concrete topics.

  • emerging some ability to synthesize.

  • emerging ability to conceptualize and discuss abstract topics.

  • strategies to persuade and convince the interlocutors.

  • emerging ability to demonstrate the socio-linguistics skills to achieve your communicative tasks, such as to persuade, to apologize, to criticize.

  • functioning in informal and formal settings, but mostly formal settings with higher presentational skills.

  • increasing control of verbal affixes and nominal affixes

  • use more extensive vocabulary

  • increasing control of verbal affixes and nominal affixes

  • more extensive vocabulary


Skills of advanced and superior speakers
Skills of Advanced and Superior Speakers Proficiency Examinations

Advanced level

  • Ability to describe and narrate in paragraph discourse.

  • Some ability to appropriately shift from informal to formal register.

  • Ability to discuss concrete and factual topics (social and professional topics)

  • Ability to negotiate a culturally appropriate manner out of an uncomfortable situation and in so doing demonstrate socio-cultural knowledge.

    Superior Level

  • Ability to tailor language to fit the audience, persuade, negotiate, advocate for a position and interpret.

  • Ability to discuss a wide range of concrete and abstract topics in extended discourse.

  • Ability to elaborate complex concepts and choose appropriate words

  • Ability to handle most formal and informal settings.


Future
Future: Proficiency Examinations

  • More data collection

  • Dissemination

  • Standardization for different purposes

  • Insights for Indonesian language curriculum and material development:

    • Communicative based

    • Content based

    • Task based

    • Standards or proficiency based ***


Thank you

THANK YOU Proficiency Examinations

TERIMA KASIH


ad