E N D
Validation of GNSS Satellite OrbitsC. Flohrer, G. Beutler, R. Dach, W. Gurtner, U. Hugentobler1, S. Schaer, T. Springer2Astronomical InstituteUniversity of Bern1Institut for Astronomical and Physical GeodesyTechnische Universität München2ESA/European Space Operations CenterDarmstadtIGS Workshop, Miami BeachJune 2, 2008
Inhalt • Introduction • SLR residuals • Orbit overlaps • 14-day peak
350·1/6 days 1/year 2/year 3/year 4/year 6/year Known Problems • Spectra of coordinate time series of IGS stationen • draconitic GPS year, most probably due to orbit modeling deficiencies Ray, 2006
–3.5 cm –3.8 cm SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits σ 2.2 cm G05 σ 2.7 cm G06
SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits GLONASS 03 GLONASS 22 GLONASS 24
SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits • Results for CODE GNSS orbits
0 D SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits
SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits • Residuals for CODE orbits of G05 and G06, ROCK a priori model
SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits • Residuals for CODE orbits of G05 and G06, CODE a priori model
SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits • Residuals for CODE GLONASS orbits
SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits • Residuals for GFZ GPS orbits
SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits • Residuals for IGS GPS orbits
SLR Validation of GNSS Orbits Plane 1 BLOCK II 2 3 4 5 BLOCK IIR 6
Orbit Overlaps, 1-Day CODE Orbits G28 radial alongtrack crosstrack
40 cm Orbit Overlaps, 1-Day CODE Orbits Plane 2 βmax = 78° Plane 3 βmax = 76° Plane 1 βmax = 70°
Orbit Overlaps, 1-Day CODE Orbits Plane 4 βmax = 61° Plane 6 βmax = 51° Plane 5 βmax = 40°
Orbit Overlaps , 1-Day CODE Orbits Plane 2 βmax = 78° Plane 3 βmax = 76° Plane 1 βmax = 70°
Orbit Overlaps , 1-Day CODE Orbits Plane 4 βmax = 61° Plane 6 βmax = 51° Plane 5 βmax = 40°
Conclusions • Orbit modeling problems affect the entire solution • Orbit periods are found in station positions and geocenter motion • SLR Residuals show a characteristic pattern • Patterns in orbit overlap time series seem not to be influenced by the a priori orbit model • Patterns depend on the maximum elevation of the Sun above the orbital plane which indicates problems with the estimated empirical orbit parameters • Prominent peak at 14-days • In alongtrack and crosstrack directions • In phase for all satellites • Period seems to be related to tidal corrections in the system orientation • Probably due to the used subdaily pole model