1 / 22

Mecklenburg County Index of Readiness and Literacy

Mecklenburg County Index of Readiness and Literacy. Harrison S. Campbell Department of Geography and Earth Science UNC-Charlotte Terri M. Manning Planning and Research Central Piedmont Community College. Why a Literacy Index. Project initiated by Charlotte Reads.

nasim-franks
Download Presentation

Mecklenburg County Index of Readiness and Literacy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mecklenburg County Index of Readiness and Literacy Harrison S. Campbell Department of Geography and Earth Science UNC-Charlotte Terri M. Manning Planning and Research Central Piedmont Community College

  2. Why a Literacy Index • Project initiated by Charlotte Reads. • There was a desire of have a “measuring stick” to mark progress in literacy annually. • Measurement would help constituent groups focus interventions on specific groups. • To our knowledge, no other county in the country is doing this.

  3. Literacy by Definition • The US Congress incorporated the following definition of literacy into the National Literacy Act of 1991: • “an individual’s ability to read, write and speak English and compute and solve problems at levels of proficiency necessary to function on the job and in society, to achieve one’s goals, and to develop one’s knowledge and potential”

  4. The Value of a Functionally Literate Community The Best Prevention is a Real Future

  5. Savings for Business and the Community Relationship of Education to Social Problems Source: CC Benefits, Economic Impact Study

  6. Benefits for the Individual-Average Annual Earnings Based on Years of Education Average Education LevelEarnings + Value • Less than HS degree $16,451 • High school degree $24,498 +$8,048 • Certificate or diploma $28,902 +$4,403 • Associate degree $31,138 +$2,236 • Three years of college $35,846 +$4,708 • Bachelors degree $40,453 +$4,607 • Masters or 5 years $49,629 +$9,176 Source: CC Benefits, Economic Impact Study

  7. Major Difficulties with a Literacy Index • No data are available annually on the educational attainment of adults. • The Census measures educational attainment once every ten years. • Obtaining a true measure of educational attainment is cost-prohibitive (surveying county residents) . • An alternative source was selected that was benchmarked again the Census data.

  8. Data Elements Used in the Index • Pre-K, 3rd, 4th and 8th grade data from CMS and private schools • Graduation numbers from CMS and private schools • Adult (22+) data (highest grade completed) from the ESC (benchmarked against the 1990 and 2000 educational data from Census)

  9. Data Elements Were Weighted • Based on: • Population numbers in school per age group • Total operative population of the county by year (removing those we don’t expect to be literate or above working age) • Conversion of percentages to scaled scores (1-10)

  10. For Example…. One small piece of the puzzle

  11. Population of Mecklenburg County 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 Operative population totals 566,150 580,984 599,516 632,208 (removing all unaffected individuals, preschoolers, retired, etc.) Population 0-18 yrs 224,880 230,891 238,259 247,814 Population in CMS 97,586 99,403 102,013 105,172 Population in private schools 16,707 17,018 17,465 17,246 Total in School 114,293 116,421 119,478 122,418 Percent in school 20.2% 20.0% 19.9% 19.4% (total in school divided by the operational population)

  12. Using 3rd Grade as an example….. In 2000-2001: CMS Private Schools Population 8,719 1,493 Percent passing EOGs 72.8% 84.5% Scaled Score 7.28 8.45 Weighted value .0145 .0025 (based on grade population divided by operative total population) Value in Overall Index .11 .02 (based on weighted value times the scaled score)

  13. The Primary Grade Levels Component(K-8) 1999 - 2002 Writing Assessment excluded from formula in 2002

  14. As the School System Makes Progress in Primary Grades • The index is only slightly affected because they account for a small piece of the total population

  15. Secondary Levels (9th – 12th)1999 - 2002 Writing Assessment excluded from formula in 2002

  16. When Secondary Level Progress Declines… • The index is even less affected because secondary students represent a smaller portion of the population than primary students.

  17. Adult Component 1999 - 2002

  18. As the County Looks at Educational Attainment in Adults.. • The Index can be greatly affected because adults make up the vast majority of the population. We must make an impact on adults.

  19. How does the ESC data compare to the Census data? Percent with high school degree

  20. Weights Used in Index, 2002

  21. Actual Index 1999 - 2002

  22. For a Color Copy of this Presentation: • Go to: • http://inside.cpcc.edu/planning/studies_reports • And click on “Readiness and Literacy Index”

More Related