html5-img
1 / 18

IFR Criteria and Your Airport Goals:

IFR Criteria and Your Airport Goals:. Quick review of criteria changes. Airport Manager’s role in gaining the best IFR minimums. Survey and data requirements. . FAA Contacts. IFR procedures: Boston Flight Procedures Office/Sue Crumb (781) 238-7220

nash
Download Presentation

IFR Criteria and Your Airport Goals:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IFR Criteria and Your AirportGoals: Quick review of criteria changes. Airport Manager’s role in gaining the best IFR minimums. Survey and data requirements.

  2. FAA Contacts • IFR procedures: Boston Flight Procedures Office/Sue Crumb (781) 238-7220 • Airport Design Criteria: Airport Division/ (781) 238-7600 • Operational Safety/Criteria: Flight Standards/Gerry Holtorf (781) 238-7215

  3. Why All the Change? • International concern over Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT). • Vertical guidance key to fewer accidents. • Resulted in the FAA changing instrument procedure criteria (TERPS). • TERPS Change 17 (1998) and 18 (1999). • TERPS and airport Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 now better aligned. • A visual area assessment is required.

  4. Visual Area Assessment for IFR Procedures • Flight Standards 10/07/03 policy letter. • Apply “paragraph 251”: • For all new approach procedures • For existing, when amended or reviewed

  5. What if VAAR is penetrated? • Flight Procedures will notify airport manager. • From date of notification, 3 years to address: • Reduce height/ “clear” obstructions, or • Mark/light obstruction(s).

  6. If clearing or lighting can’t be done? • 20:1 penetrations may be mitigated by: • A vertical glide slope indicator (VGSI). • Sited at or above 3.0 degrees. • VGSI obstacle surface must be clear. • Note on approach plate requiring VGSI for night.

  7. What will these changes mean to my airport? • NEW APPROACH: airport design standards are integral to gaining a new approach. Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 is now better aligned with TERPS. • EXISTING IFR APPROACH: Obstruction penetrations of these visual assessment surfaces may cause a change to straight-in or night circling minimums.

  8. If this three years catches up to you… • FAA will take steps to not authorize night minimums to the affected runways. • UNLESS: • Acceptable corrective action is in progress, and • Airport submits a request for extension.

  9. Airport Manager’s Role • Initiate an Aeronautical Study • 1. Airport sponsor initiates the request. • 2. Master Plan or Airport Layout Plan (ALP) considerations. • 3. Requirements identified for data, survey, environmental, etc. • 4. Determine funding and plan of action. • FAA completes the Aeronautical Study.

  10. Survey: Level of obstruction survey depends upon level of approach minimums desired. Data: accurate runway ends, navigation/ visual aid site info & up to date ALP and 5010. Communication: with the Flight Procedures Office and Airports Division. NOTE: Lead times for procedures can exceed ONE YEAR! Remember:

  11. Surveys*In accordance with FAA Specification 405 Requirements provided in Appendix 16 of AC 5300-13*No survey = day/visibility equal to or >1sm*Part 77 “Level C or D”= Non-precision

  12. Helpful Web SitesFlight Standards-http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/afs400(TERPS under AFS-420)Flight Procedures-http://www.avn.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=indexSurvey info- http://www.noaa.gov(Spec 405 and more)

  13. How do I know what applies? • Check AC 150/5300-13 Appendix 16. • Provides a matrix of minimums vs. airport requirements. • Generally in concert with TERPS. • Are the runway OFZ and safety area correct for largest design group aircraft? • TERPS minimums now effected by OFZ, hold lines, etc.

  14. Circling Approaches • Require visual assessment for night approach minimums. • Smaller area than for straight-in nonprecision approaches.

  15. Straight-in Approaches • Require visual assessment for day and night approach minimums. • Generally larger than circling area. • Slope varies depending upon visibility.

  16. SUMMARY New Procedures: • Process generally starts with the Airports Division • ALP revision • Contact your ANE-600 planning person • Request the procedure through the FPO/Sue Crumb -Sue Crumb: (781) 238-7220 • Plan to work with FAA team through an iterative aeronautical study process.

  17. Summary Cont. Existing Procedure Assessments: • Don’t wait for FAA to come knocking… • Plan ahead. • Get the evaluation process started. • Request an Aeronautical study if required. • We want to protect the maximum utility of your instrument approaches.

  18. OK! What’s the bottom line? • FAA will work together with you and your staff and/or consultants during the Aeronautical Study. • Evaluate Part 77 penetrations. • Study of applicable Airport Design AC & TERPS surfaces. • Good Part 77 survey supports most of the approach analysis (some exceptions). • Examine lowest minimums possible. • FAA determination includes Part 77 obstruction lighting if clearing not practical.

More Related