Modification of height handling for gpsro in wrfvar cwb period 2010022400 to 2010030918z
Download
1 / 12

Modification of Height Handling for GPSRO in WRFVAR: CWB Period: 2010022400 to 2010030918Z - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 46 Views
  • Uploaded on

Modification of Height Handling for GPSRO in WRFVAR: CWB Period: 2010022400 to 2010030918Z. Background. Review of definition of geopotental height used in meteorology (and WRFVAR) is reviewed.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Modification of Height Handling for GPSRO in WRFVAR: CWB Period: 2010022400 to 2010030918Z' - nascha


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Modification of height handling for gpsro in wrfvar cwb period 2010022400 to 2010030918z

Modification of Height Handlingfor GPSRO in WRFVAR:CWB Period: 2010022400 to 2010030918Z


Background

Background

Review of definition of geopotental height used in meteorology (and WRFVAR) is reviewed.

Simulation of expected height differences when we use height data from GPS RO is introduced. The key is how to handle acceleration due to gravity.


Definition
Definition

Definition of geopotential

F: geopotential [m2 s-2]

g: acceleration due to gravity [m s-2]

Note: it depends on f and z

f: latitude [deg.]

z: geometric height [m] (CDDAC COSMIC RO)

  • At sea level, difference between Z and z is zero because

    • Same geopotential height at sea level (geoid, g is same at reference height 0)

  • Biases between z and Z depending on latitude and height

    • Due to difference of g and g0

Geopotential height

Z: geopotential height [m] (NWP, WRF, Meteorology)

g0: standard gravity at mean sea level [m s-2]

Note: it doesn’t depend on f and z

Definition: the acceleration of a body in free fall at sea level at a geodetic latitude of about 45.5°

Textbook of meteorology approximate that g doesn’t change with height and latitude, and then Z is almost close to z, but we cannot use the approximation in RO world.

Plot in next slide:


Ideal sphere Earth

In meteorology

Center of mass

Real Earth

(geodesy)

Geoid height, 0m

  • In z (geometric height) –Z (geopotential height) plot above, positive value in equator shows g in equator is smaller than g0.

  • Negative value near pole in lower atmosphere is because g in pole is larger than g0, but positive value in higher atmosphere (15km~) is, again, because g in higher altitude is smaller than g0


Observation minus background o b statistics

Observation minus Background (O-B) Statistics

O-B statistics for about 2 weeks (56 initializations) are computed to check improvement of handling of height in modified WRFVAR system (original vs modified)

Latitude dependency of O-B is also introduced because original WRFVAR has biases depending on height and latitude (see background)

Differences of vertical interpolation scheme is also introduced for further improvement of WRFVAR


O b statistics in original and modified wrfvar
O-B Statistics in Original and Modified WRFVAR

Positive biases in original WRFVAR are disappeared in modified WRFVAR

Original

Modified


Latitude dependency of o b biases
Latitude Dependency of O-B Biases

As expected from slide 4, lower latitude has more biases due to larger height differences.


O b statistics for linear and logarithm vertical interpolation in modified wrfvar
O-B Statistics for Linear and Logarithm Vertical Interpolation in Modified WRFVAR

Logarithm interpolation prevents wavy pattern in O-B biases shown in linear interpolation

Modified

Modified

+Logarithm


O b statistics for linear and logarithm vertical interpolation
O-B Statistics for Linear and Logarithm Vertical Interpolation

logarithm vertical interpolation works better than linear interpolation in refractivity

Original

Modified

Modified

+Logarithm


Observation cost function

Observation Cost Function Interpolation

Statistics of O-B cost function is generated to check validity of observation errors assigned for GPSRO in current WRFVAR

Differences of vertical interpolation scheme is also introduced


Statistics of obs cost function in original and modified wrfvar
Statistics of Obs. Cost Function in Original and Modified WRFVAR

Observation cost function intensify biases due to relatively small obs.error in higher atmosphere.

Original

Modified


Statistics of obs cost function in linear and logarithm vertical interpolation in modified wrfvar
Statistics of Obs. Cost Function WRFVARin Linear and Logarithm Vertical Interpolation in Modified WRFVAR

Logarithm interpolation shows better performance in obs. cost function (no wavy signal, and near zero)

Modified

Modified

+Logarithm


ad