Helsinki Research Group for Political Sociology (HEPO) Meeting with the ’ Moderns ’

1. Helsinki Research Group for PoliticalSociology (HEPO) Meetingwith the ’Moderns’ University of Helsinki 15 March 2011

2. HEPO basics Founded / institutionalizedby Risto Alapuro, Markku Lonkila, Eeva Luhtakallio and Tuomas Ylä-Anttila Studies of politicalprocesses , practices and disputes; social movements & associations, activism, civilsociety, democratization, publicsphere… Globalscope, comparativeperspective Particularlystrongknowledge of French and Russiansocieties

3. More info on HEPO HEPO blog: http://blogs.helsinki.fi/politicalsociology/ HEPO in Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=153211418045316

4. HEPO teaching Seminar for doctoralstudents Series of lecturesby HEPO members and colleagues: ’Politics on the move’, http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/blogs/spaces/move.htm Workshop course on qualitativemethodsby Eeva Luhtakallio Supervision of doctoral and masters’ theses

5. HEPO post-docresearchers AkhlaqAhmad* Risto Alapuro* Markku Lonkila* Eeva Luhtakallio* Suvi Salmenniemi: Self-help and Conceptions of a ‘Good Life’ in Finland and Russia Tuomas Ylä-Anttila*

6. Doctoralstudentsaffiliatedwith HEPO Karin Creutz-Kämppi* Leonardo Custodio: Community media, democratictheory and participation Veikko Eranti* Peter Holley* Suvi Huikuri*

7. Doctoralstudentsaffiliatedwith HEPO (cont) • ZeinabKarimi* • Meri Kulmala: Womens’ activism in RussianCarelia • Mari Kuukkanen: Means and ends of anarchist politics in Finland • Sofia Laine* • Samu Lindström*

8. Doctoralstudentsaffiliatedwith HEPO (cont) Eveliina Louhivuori* Laura Lyytikäinen: Youth civic activism and protest movements in Moscow. Elina Mikola* Freek van der Vet: Russiancivilsociety and access to the Europeancourt of humanrights Minna Viuhko: The organisation of humantrafficking

9. Someexamples of HEPO masters’ theses Veikko Eranti: Variations of NIMBY. Common good and self-interest in the opinions of the inhabitants of Etelä-Haaga Suvi Huikuri: Dispute on climate: Justificationspresentedby the global North and South in the conferences on climatechange. (Kiista ilmastosta: pohjoisen ja etelän esittämät oikeutukset uutta ilmastosopimusta rakentavien kokousten julkisissa keskusteluissa). Samu Lindström: Gate crashers’ demonstrations (Kuokkavieras –mielenosoitukset) Kaisa Luhtala: Civicactivism in the internet-era. The arrival of Carrotmob in Finland (Kansalaisaktivismi internet -aikana. Porkkanamafian tulo Suomeen) Hanne Hämäläinen: Visuaalinen vastademokratia valta- ja vastajulkisuudessa

10. Recentdissertationsby HEPO • Eeva Luhtakallio: LocalPoliticizations - A Comparison of Finns and FrenchPracticingDemocracy" (Politisaation paikat. Tutkimus suomalaisista ja ranskalaisista demokratian käytännöistä) • Tuomas Ylä-Anttila: Politiikan paluu - Globalisaatioliike ja julkisuus (The Return of Politics – The Global Justice Movement and the Public Sphere)

11. HEPO is full of HOPE!

12. Youth political participation in transnational agoras Sofia Laine PhD Candidate, Institute of Development Studies, University of Helsinki

13. Research setting Participants come form several different countries. Transnational themes. Mostly 17-30-years-old Freedom= diversity of the forms of political actions = room for creativity Different form of knowledge takes place in different forms of political participation Young peoples’political participation in transnational political meetings World Social Forums (2006 Bamako, 2007 Nairobi and 2009 Belém), European Social Forum (2008 Malmö), Global Young Greens Foundin Conference (2007 Nairobi), EU Presidency Youth Event (2007 Hyvinkää)

14. Articles and timetable 1. Laine, Sofia & Gretschel, Anu (2009) Whose arena the EU youth policy is? Young participants’ involvement and influence in EU youth policy from their own points of view: Case of EU Presidency Youth Event in Hyvinkää, Finland. Young 17(2), pp. 191–215. 2. Laine, Sofia (2009) Contestatory Performative Acts in the Transnational Political Meetings. Societies Without Borders 4(3), pp. 398–429. 3. Laine, Sofia (forthcoming, fall 2011) Grounded globalizations of transnational social movement. Ethnographic Analysis on Free Hugs Campaign at the World Social Forum Belém 2009. Ephemera – theory and politics in organization 4. Laine, Sofia (under construction) Methodological cosmopolitanism. In Haverinen, Ahponen and Harinen (eds.) Methodological nationalism – transnational reality: crossing civic cultural borderlines. • Preliminary examination of the dissertation June– September. Corrections in October. • Submitting to Faculty: November-December • Defense: January-February 2012

15. Samu Lindström: The Gatecrasher movement and the Finnish political culture • the gatecrasher demonstrations (arranged during 1996–2007 on 6th of December, the Finnish national day) provoked a wide public debate because of the radical repertoires of action that were used • the protest represented new kind of activism in the Finnish perspective owing to its organisational basis, forms of action and goals • the Finnish consensus driven tradition of avoiding conflicts is challenged by the newest radicalism, but to what extent? • the transformation of the gatecrasher publicity: after the favourable phase the gatecrashers were represented as threatening, then trivial and finally as an institutionally conquered phenomenon without any political significance • under scrutiny: the internal publicity of the gatecrasher movement reached through archived web discussions and other alternative media

16. Newspapers in Finland, France, India, California, South Africa, Malawi • UN meetings 2005 - 2011 • Public Justifications Analysis: Moral dispute on climate (Ecology, Market, Civic… Climate Change and Civil Society (CLIC) Interviews + analysis of websites of environmental organizations Their justifications, views on the public debate and global networking From global justice to climate justice?

17. Peter HolleyThe Nation (Re)Imagined: National Belonging amongst Immigrant ‘Activists’in Finland and Finnish Expatriates in the UK • Aim: To understand how migrants construct an image of a Finnish ‘nation’ and how they position themselves in relation to an imagined Finnish ‘national community’. (Anderson 1991; Billig 1995) • I understand the ‘nation’ (like ethnicity and ‘race’) as a basic unit of social classification. (Brubaker, Loveman & Stamotov 2004) • This approach does not uphold (methodological) nationalism’s belief that the social world is “‘naturally’ divided into [national] communities” (Billig 1995: 63). • Rather the ‘nation’ is comprehend as a cognitive category – the ‘nation’ is “fundamentally not a thing in the world, but a perspective on the world.” (Brubaker, Loveman & Stamotov 2004: 32. See also DiMaggio 1997) • The following research questions guide my research: • How is the Finnish ‘nation’ constructed by those studied? • And how do those studied position themselves in relation to a perceived Finnish ‘national community’? • Two ethnographic case studies: • Immigrant ‘activists’ in Finland – those active in immigrant NGOs and/or social networks. • Finnish expatriates in the UK – within ‘Finnish’ social networks/cultural institutions. • Dual Migrant Perspective: immigrant ‘activists’ in Finland and Finnish expatriates abroad. • Both ‘groups’ studied present a challenge to homogeneous, territorially bound imaging of the Finnish nation-state. • The first represents the ‘immigrant Other’ within the sovereign borders of the Finnish state, whilst the second symbolizes an extension of the ‘national community’ beyond the state’s territorial limits. • Current status: I am now beginning to collect fieldwork data, tentatively entering the field and continuing to locate/contact potential participants in Finland. The project title and its content are a work in progress... all suggestions for improvement are most welcome! Doctoral Student Department of Social Research (Sociology)/ CEREN, Swedish School of Social Science

18. Engagement in Political Action: Comparing Climate Activism in Finland, France, and the USEeva Luhtakallio How do climate issues translate into local civic practices? Whatkind of engagements do these practices articulate? What do these practices tell about the dynamics of local, national,and global climatepolitics? Bicycle politics in threecities: Helsinki, Los Angeles, Paris Critical mass demonstrations, transport activism, environmental life style groups… And local questions of climate justice?

19. Markku Lonkila STUDY INTERESTS • Russiancivilsociety in a comparativeperspective • Cultural, social and moralfoundations of Russianeconomy • Internet and social media in civic and politicalactivism THE BIG QUESTIONS • Whatkind of socio-politicalsystem is about to form in present-dayRussia? • Howcanassociations, social movements and activismcontribute to Russiandemocratization? CONCRETE STUDIES • The role of social networksites in Russian and Finnishactivism • Urbanactivism in Helsinki and St. Petersburg • Anti-militaryactivism in Russia • Cardrivers’ associations and movements in Russia and Finland • Social networks in the Russianmarketeconomy (PalgraveMacmillan, 2011)

20. ”No to the street in the Kumpula valley” (Ei katua Kumpulanlaaksoon!)

21. ”No to the new block of flats on Komendantskii Prospekt 40 in St. Petersburg”

22. KP40 before

23. KP40 after

24. Climate Risk Management in Urban Environment – Strategies to enhance social adaptation and resilience • Adaptation to climate change is necessary all over the world • Urbanization is a global phenomenon -> special problems • Climate-related risks need to be taken into account in urban policy • International organizations (e.g. World Bank, IMF, UN) have programs and recommendations – How they are taken into account at local level? • Comparative study of metropolises (developing, industrial or both?) The idea is to.. 1) generate scientific knowledge on risk management and adaptation methods of cities; 2) understand the impacts of climate change to cities and its inhabitants; 3) explore social responses to mitigate and adapt to CC in city level; 4) enhance the resilience of social systems; 5) contribute sustainable urbanization HEPO/Moderns 15.3.2011 Suvi Huikuri

25. Karin Creutz-KämppiSOCIAL BOUNDARIES IN A SUPRANATIONAL CONTEXT: COLLECTIVE POSITIONING AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF EUROPEANNESS IN MEDIA DISCOURSES ON ISLAMKEY CONCEPTS: Sociology of knowledge, nationalisms, Europeanization, Islam, globalization, social boundaries, subject positions, group consciousness, media, rhetorical analysis • The struggle over regional identity: “different struggles over classifications, struggles over the monopoly over power to make people see and believe, to get them to know and recognize, to impose the legitimate definition of the divisions of the social world and, thereby, to make and unmake groups” (Bourdieu 1991, 221). • A collective gets its distinct form and substance when it is mirrored against the idea of an outer collective (Schütz & Luckmann 1973). • The focus of my study is on the positions for collective identification –on the groupness constructed and reinforced in a dichotomic relationship with the notion of Islam. • As collectivity on a global level is distant to the everyday-life of the individual, withoutattachment to daily practices, it is from a sociological viewpoint interesting to look at how theseconceptions of belonging are rhetorically constructed and legitimized as positions for identification. • This assessment simultaneously shows articulations of the discursive power specific institutionalizedknowledge forms possess. • As unnoticed parts of our daily lives media representations possess a specifically powerful role asreality-constructing and reality-establishing systems; they appear in a naturalized form as taken for granted knowledge, and hence pass without being in the center of our attention (Alasuutari 1996). • Aim: to identify the forms of belonging and the meaning production related to the concepts representing this collectivity by analyzing media texts that cover Islam from a global perspective. • My key research question is: who represent the We-collective when Islam is presented as the Other? • How is groupness articulated and what are the specific concepts identified with? • How are national and supranational positions negotiated? • How are the different subject positions rhetorically signified? • How are these concepts legitimized? • The topic is approached through comparative case-studies of three countries, by analyzing newspaper discussions in Finland, Turkey and the UK. • Research Data: Samples from HelsinginSanomat (Finland), The Times (UK) & Hurriyet (Hungary) 2001-2011. • Method:Rhetorical analysis (Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca 1971). • Focus on argumentation in common language – how we argue on the basis of values, how these are legitimized and how agreement is reached through argumentation. The first case study: The Domestication of Global News: National Coverage of the 2011 Uprising in Egypt Doctoral Student Department of Social Research (Sociology)/ CEREN, Swedish School of Social Science

26. Intergenerational Relationships in International Immigrant Families Parent-Adult Child Relationships of Iranian Immigrant Families in Finland ZeinabKarimi Postgraduate Student Department of Social Research (Sociology)